Comments on: Nuclear Explosions Since 1945 http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/12/nuclear-explosions-since-1945/ Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media Tue, 14 Feb 2012 20:03:30 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5 By: osbjmg http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/12/nuclear-explosions-since-1945/comment-page-1/#comment-242021 osbjmg Tue, 15 Dec 2009 19:50:11 +0000 http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=45640#comment-242021 sgornick - I agree, but nobody is classifying the two in Japan as tests. The graphic says "atmospheric attacks." Is there a comment that got deleted that I didn't see or are you making up data like a climatologist? sgornick – I agree, but nobody is classifying the two in Japan as tests. The graphic says “atmospheric attacks.” Is there a comment that got deleted that I didn’t see or are you making up data like a climatologist?

]]> By: ZedLoch http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/12/nuclear-explosions-since-1945/comment-page-1/#comment-242016 ZedLoch Tue, 15 Dec 2009 19:34:35 +0000 http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=45640#comment-242016 what's the deal with "1979?" off of South Africa... If this is a game of RISK then who's playing grey? what’s the deal with “1979?” off of South Africa…

If this is a game of RISK then who’s playing grey?

]]> By: sgornick http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/12/nuclear-explosions-since-1945/comment-page-1/#comment-242010 sgornick Tue, 15 Dec 2009 19:06:40 +0000 http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=45640#comment-242010 I wouldn't exactly classify the two for Japan in 1945 as "tests". I wouldn’t exactly classify the two for Japan in 1945 as “tests”.

]]>