<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PingTest.Net</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/12/pingtest-net/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/12/pingtest-net/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:33:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: How the Common Man Sees It</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/12/pingtest-net/comment-page-1/#comment-239539</link>
		<dc:creator>How the Common Man Sees It</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 10:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=44415#comment-239539</guid>
		<description>uhhh, speaking of &#039;pings&#039; Barry:

Feds ‘Pinged’ Sprint GPS Data 8 Million Times Over a Year

http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2009/12/gps-data</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>uhhh, speaking of &#8216;pings&#8217; Barry:</p>
<p>Feds ‘Pinged’ Sprint GPS Data 8 Million Times Over a Year</p>
<p><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2009/12/gps-data" rel="nofollow">http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2009/12/gps-data</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ToNYC</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/12/pingtest-net/comment-page-1/#comment-239536</link>
		<dc:creator>ToNYC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 10:32:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=44415#comment-239536</guid>
		<description>start
cmd
ping ritholtz.com

107ms  (Comcast, left coast)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>start<br />
cmd<br />
ping ritholtz.com</p>
<p>107ms  (Comcast, left coast)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bitjockey</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/12/pingtest-net/comment-page-1/#comment-239533</link>
		<dc:creator>bitjockey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 09:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=44415#comment-239533</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been using it&#039;s developer&#039;s site, SpeedTest.net, for quite a while - it also performs upload and download tests which most ISP allocate at different bandwidths.

The feature I find most useful for both sites is not the actual test but that it archives your results so that you can compare the results from the current test to previous results. While they don&#039;t yet let one test multiple preconfigured sites (star test) , one can select from a large variety of test hosts world wide.

www.speedtest.net</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been using it&#8217;s developer&#8217;s site, SpeedTest.net, for quite a while &#8211; it also performs upload and download tests which most ISP allocate at different bandwidths.</p>
<p>The feature I find most useful for both sites is not the actual test but that it archives your results so that you can compare the results from the current test to previous results. While they don&#8217;t yet let one test multiple preconfigured sites (star test) , one can select from a large variety of test hosts world wide.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.speedtest.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.speedtest.net</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: some_guy_in_a_cube</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/12/pingtest-net/comment-page-1/#comment-239525</link>
		<dc:creator>some_guy_in_a_cube</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 04:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=44415#comment-239525</guid>
		<description>BR. are the great unwashed masses really ready for packet loss and jitter?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BR. are the great unwashed masses really ready for packet loss and jitter?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike in Nola</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/12/pingtest-net/comment-page-1/#comment-239487</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike in Nola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 22:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=44415#comment-239487</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s very important if you&#039;re playing Left4.dead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s very important if you&#8217;re playing Left4.dead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: huxrules</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/12/pingtest-net/comment-page-1/#comment-239473</link>
		<dc:creator>huxrules</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 21:19:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=44415#comment-239473</guid>
		<description>sory for the dupe - something put http:// in my above comment - just sayin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sory for the dupe &#8211; something put http:// in my above comment &#8211; just sayin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: huxrules</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/12/pingtest-net/comment-page-1/#comment-239472</link>
		<dc:creator>huxrules</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 21:18:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=44415#comment-239472</guid>
		<description>too lazy to type it in?

$ ping www.ritholtz.com
PING ritholtz.com (97.107.138.xxx): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 97.107.138.xxx: icmp_seq=0 ttl=46 time=175.675 ms
64 bytes from 97.107.138.xxx: icmp_seq=1 ttl=46 time=170.815 ms

from tel aviv - still pretty good speed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>too lazy to type it in?</p>
<p>$ ping <a href="http://www.ritholtz.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.ritholtz.com</a><br />
PING ritholtz.com (97.107.138.xxx): 56 data bytes<br />
64 bytes from 97.107.138.xxx: icmp_seq=0 ttl=46 time=175.675 ms<br />
64 bytes from 97.107.138.xxx: icmp_seq=1 ttl=46 time=170.815 ms</p>
<p>from tel aviv &#8211; still pretty good speed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tagyoureit</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/12/pingtest-net/comment-page-1/#comment-239470</link>
		<dc:creator>tagyoureit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 21:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=44415#comment-239470</guid>
		<description>Give me a ping, Vasili.  One ping only.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Give me a ping, Vasili.  One ping only.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bogwad_seigneur (the smelly one)</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/12/pingtest-net/comment-page-1/#comment-239463</link>
		<dc:creator>bogwad_seigneur (the smelly one)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 20:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=44415#comment-239463</guid>
		<description>Sorry all, I&#039;m on a flaky connection, keystrokes are not echoed correctly, BR: pls delete duped comment. I 
do apologize to everyone, that URL screwup was the result of bad typing, and not seeing the result immediately in my interface.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry all, I&#8217;m on a flaky connection, keystrokes are not echoed correctly, BR: pls delete duped comment. I<br />
do apologize to everyone, that URL screwup was the result of bad typing, and not seeing the result immediately in my interface.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bogwad_seigneur (the smelly one)</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/12/pingtest-net/comment-page-1/#comment-239461</link>
		<dc:creator>bogwad_seigneur (the smelly one)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 20:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=44415#comment-239461</guid>
		<description>Perhaps a more meaningful test might be using &lt;a href=&quot;http://just-ping.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;simple-ping.com/a&gt; which gives you ping times from (currently) 47 locations worldwide. It&#039;s a useful tool in seeing what it takes for people to reach your site in terms of raw time;

http://just-ping.com/index.php?vh=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ritholtz.com%2F&amp;c=&amp;s=ping!

This is infinitely more significant than any of those so-called (charlatan and mostly worthless) &quot;speed tests&quot; out there. If you&#039;re a site operator, you need to know how rapidly your site is resolved by your target audience (and where it might NOT be successfully resolved) and so, then, a broad based &quot;star ping&quot; set of results is much more important.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps a more meaningful test might be using <a href="http://just-ping.com" rel="nofollow">simple-ping.com/a&gt; which gives you ping times from (currently) 47 locations worldwide. It&#8217;s a useful tool in seeing what it takes for people to reach your site in terms of raw time;</p>
<p></a><a href="http://just-ping.com/index.php?vh=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ritholtz.com%2F&#038;c=&#038;s=ping" rel="nofollow">http://just-ping.com/index.php?vh=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ritholtz.com%2F&#038;c=&#038;s=ping</a>!</p>
<p>This is infinitely more significant than any of those so-called (charlatan and mostly worthless) &#8220;speed tests&#8221; out there. If you&#8217;re a site operator, you need to know how rapidly your site is resolved by your target audience (and where it might NOT be successfully resolved) and so, then, a broad based &#8220;star ping&#8221; set of results is much more important.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

