<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Final 2009 Market Performance Numbers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2010/01/2009-performance-numbers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2010/01/2009-performance-numbers/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:26:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Croupier</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2010/01/2009-performance-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-245391</link>
		<dc:creator>Croupier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 00:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=47834#comment-245391</guid>
		<description>Could be another decade of poor returns ahead for the S&amp;P, but do you really want to own gold? What is deflation is the real problem - not inflation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could be another decade of poor returns ahead for the S&amp;P, but do you really want to own gold? What is deflation is the real problem &#8211; not inflation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How the Common Man Sees It</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2010/01/2009-performance-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-245304</link>
		<dc:creator>How the Common Man Sees It</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 14:02:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=47834#comment-245304</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://tinyurl.com/ylaom39&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Gold ETFs attract $17 billion in 2009&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;i&gt;The value of the gold content in these funds is up roughly 84% over the year, the question now is, can the markets take more PGM ETFs?&lt;/i&gt;

.....which is what helped lead to this:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://tinyurl.com/ylptbdm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Gold&#039;s 25% rise in 2009 eclipsed by palladium, platinum and silver&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;i&gt;2009 was a great year for appreciation in the price of precious metals with pgms the best performers following their big falls in 2008. Silver also showed strong gains.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/ylaom39" rel="nofollow">Gold ETFs attract $17 billion in 2009</a></p>
<p><i>The value of the gold content in these funds is up roughly 84% over the year, the question now is, can the markets take more PGM ETFs?</i></p>
<p>&#8230;..which is what helped lead to this:</p>
<p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/ylptbdm" rel="nofollow">Gold&#8217;s 25% rise in 2009 eclipsed by palladium, platinum and silver</a></p>
<p><i>2009 was a great year for appreciation in the price of precious metals with pgms the best performers following their big falls in 2008. Silver also showed strong gains.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SINGER</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2010/01/2009-performance-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-245302</link>
		<dc:creator>SINGER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 13:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=47834#comment-245302</guid>
		<description>The fact that this was the first decade with negative returns including dividends should tell you that something in the overall trend has changed...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fact that this was the first decade with negative returns including dividends should tell you that something in the overall trend has changed&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry Ritholtz</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2010/01/2009-performance-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-245288</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry Ritholtz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 11:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=47834#comment-245288</guid>
		<description>Here:

http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/12/statistics-scientific-consensus-on-climate-change/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/12/statistics-scientific-consensus-on-climate-change/" rel="nofollow">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/12/statistics-scientific-consensus-on-climate-change/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcus Aurelius</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2010/01/2009-performance-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-245195</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcus Aurelius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 22:09:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=47834#comment-245195</guid>
		<description>No one should try to interpret this data as doing so would both expose your prejudices and render the value of the data worthless.

BTW, what happened to the global warming thread?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No one should try to interpret this data as doing so would both expose your prejudices and render the value of the data worthless.</p>
<p>BTW, what happened to the global warming thread?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

