<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Banking Sector Remains (literally) Unchanged</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2010/01/banking-sector-remains-literally-unchanged/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2010/01/banking-sector-remains-literally-unchanged/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 23:28:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Big Picture &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Who Bears the Costs of Post-Crisis Recovery ?</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2010/01/banking-sector-remains-literally-unchanged/comment-page-1/#comment-248971</link>
		<dc:creator>The Big Picture &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Who Bears the Costs of Post-Crisis Recovery ?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 14:46:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=48127#comment-248971</guid>
		<description>[...] senior execs have lost their jobs, but they have been the exception. A recent study found that 92% of TARP firm senior execs, boards of directors, and C-level management were still running the firms they had [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] senior execs have lost their jobs, but they have been the exception. A recent study found that 92% of TARP firm senior execs, boards of directors, and C-level management were still running the firms they had [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Big Picture &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Media Appearance: MSNBC’s Morning Meeting</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2010/01/banking-sector-remains-literally-unchanged/comment-page-1/#comment-245897</link>
		<dc:creator>The Big Picture &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Media Appearance: MSNBC’s Morning Meeting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 14:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=48127#comment-245897</guid>
		<description>[...] This morning, I will visiting with Chris Jansing on MSNBC’s Morning Meeting. We will be discussing yesterday&#8217;s post on Banking Sector Remains (literally) Unchanged. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This morning, I will visiting with Chris Jansing on MSNBC’s Morning Meeting. We will be discussing yesterday&#8217;s post on Banking Sector Remains (literally) Unchanged. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TakBak04</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2010/01/banking-sector-remains-literally-unchanged/comment-page-1/#comment-245826</link>
		<dc:creator>TakBak04</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 01:03:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=48127#comment-245826</guid>
		<description>BR...I know how busy you are...but as a buyer and reader of your book ...Hope you will take out time to check this one out from Chris Hedges.   It&#039;s long...but I think that as you say you are an open minded fellow and love contrarian views along with some radical stuff .....this one is for you.  

It&#039;s long...but well worth the watch about America/Economy/Media/Branding/Sports/Markets/Celebrity. ..... (be sure you listen to all after the Michael Jackson stuff...he goes back to that at the end.  It&#039;s really a Tour de Force...from Hedges who has much to say about where we&#039;ve been, where we are and where we might be going if we don&#039;t WAKE UP! 

Well it&#039;s just an incredible watch whether one agrees or disagrees what he says is some really serious stuff...I hope you will take the time to watch it &quot;BR&quot; because when I bought your book and read it....I felt you might be a part to the great puzzle that Hedges so emphatically and passionately lays out about what faces all Americans...and how we got to this point.  Really the whole thing is just incredible watch.
-----------------
CHRIS HEDGES: “Empire of Illusion: The End of Literacy and the Triumph of Spectacle”


http://www.democracynow.org/blog/2009/12/18/chris_hedges</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BR&#8230;I know how busy you are&#8230;but as a buyer and reader of your book &#8230;Hope you will take out time to check this one out from Chris Hedges.   It&#8217;s long&#8230;but I think that as you say you are an open minded fellow and love contrarian views along with some radical stuff &#8230;..this one is for you.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s long&#8230;but well worth the watch about America/Economy/Media/Branding/Sports/Markets/Celebrity. &#8230;.. (be sure you listen to all after the Michael Jackson stuff&#8230;he goes back to that at the end.  It&#8217;s really a Tour de Force&#8230;from Hedges who has much to say about where we&#8217;ve been, where we are and where we might be going if we don&#8217;t WAKE UP! </p>
<p>Well it&#8217;s just an incredible watch whether one agrees or disagrees what he says is some really serious stuff&#8230;I hope you will take the time to watch it &#8220;BR&#8221; because when I bought your book and read it&#8230;.I felt you might be a part to the great puzzle that Hedges so emphatically and passionately lays out about what faces all Americans&#8230;and how we got to this point.  Really the whole thing is just incredible watch.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
CHRIS HEDGES: “Empire of Illusion: The End of Literacy and the Triumph of Spectacle”</p>
<p><a href="http://www.democracynow.org/blog/2009/12/18/chris_hedges" rel="nofollow">http://www.democracynow.org/blog/2009/12/18/chris_hedges</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Through the Looking Glass</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2010/01/banking-sector-remains-literally-unchanged/comment-page-1/#comment-245744</link>
		<dc:creator>Through the Looking Glass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 19:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=48127#comment-245744</guid>
		<description>I cant add anything to this except maybe to say, forget it he says it all.....Just dont ever believe a politician or political party will change things , they are just pieces on the plutocrats chessboard.


 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hYIC0eZYEtI</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I cant add anything to this except maybe to say, forget it he says it all&#8230;..Just dont ever believe a politician or political party will change things , they are just pieces on the plutocrats chessboard.</p>
<p> <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hYIC0eZYEtI" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hYIC0eZYEtI</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kent @ The Financial Philosopher</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2010/01/banking-sector-remains-literally-unchanged/comment-page-1/#comment-245727</link>
		<dc:creator>Kent @ The Financial Philosopher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 17:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=48127#comment-245727</guid>
		<description>To extend upon Marcus Aurelius&#039; comment, why expect bankers (or anyone else, for that matter) to change?  The only change you can control is yourself.   With regard to banking, there are so many options for managing personal assets that there is no truly valid reason for doing business directly with a &quot;bailout bank.&quot;

Expecting bankers to change is no different (and not any more intelligent) than expecting politicians to change.  As long as bankers and politicians remain human, they will not change behavior, at least not in our life time.

To paraphrase the legendary trader, Jesse Livermore, &quot;the pockets change, the suckers change, the stocks change... but human nature never changes. &quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To extend upon Marcus Aurelius&#8217; comment, why expect bankers (or anyone else, for that matter) to change?  The only change you can control is yourself.   With regard to banking, there are so many options for managing personal assets that there is no truly valid reason for doing business directly with a &#8220;bailout bank.&#8221;</p>
<p>Expecting bankers to change is no different (and not any more intelligent) than expecting politicians to change.  As long as bankers and politicians remain human, they will not change behavior, at least not in our life time.</p>
<p>To paraphrase the legendary trader, Jesse Livermore, &#8220;the pockets change, the suckers change, the stocks change&#8230; but human nature never changes. &#8220;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hgordon</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2010/01/banking-sector-remains-literally-unchanged/comment-page-1/#comment-245726</link>
		<dc:creator>hgordon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 17:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=48127#comment-245726</guid>
		<description>@mannwich - certainly, it is a stretch to predict bloodshed, but I wonder if such an uprising doesn&#039;t take the form of Rush Limbaugh cheering on the charge that is led by Sarah Palin.  As difficult as it is to imagine someone like Palin winning an election, it would be wrong to dismiss the possibility of a powerful populist-based &quot;conservatism&quot; groundswell.  This is not outside the scope of US history.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@mannwich &#8211; certainly, it is a stretch to predict bloodshed, but I wonder if such an uprising doesn&#8217;t take the form of Rush Limbaugh cheering on the charge that is led by Sarah Palin.  As difficult as it is to imagine someone like Palin winning an election, it would be wrong to dismiss the possibility of a powerful populist-based &#8220;conservatism&#8221; groundswell.  This is not outside the scope of US history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mannwich</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2010/01/banking-sector-remains-literally-unchanged/comment-page-1/#comment-245724</link>
		<dc:creator>Mannwich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 17:42:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=48127#comment-245724</guid>
		<description>@hgordon:  As long as the majority of people have ample access to food, shelter and circuses (and i-thingy&#039;s), there will be no uprising.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@hgordon:  As long as the majority of people have ample access to food, shelter and circuses (and i-thingy&#8217;s), there will be no uprising.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hgordon</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2010/01/banking-sector-remains-literally-unchanged/comment-page-1/#comment-245719</link>
		<dc:creator>hgordon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 17:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=48127#comment-245719</guid>
		<description>Clearly, the existing power structure has no motivation to make any changes.  With respect to Marcus Aurelius&#039; comment, how much worst does this have to get before we get to a populist uprising with Bastille storming and guillotines ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clearly, the existing power structure has no motivation to make any changes.  With respect to Marcus Aurelius&#8217; comment, how much worst does this have to get before we get to a populist uprising with Bastille storming and guillotines ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JustinTheSkeptic</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2010/01/banking-sector-remains-literally-unchanged/comment-page-1/#comment-245716</link>
		<dc:creator>JustinTheSkeptic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 17:23:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=48127#comment-245716</guid>
		<description>Next comes fascism.  NO, we already have that...lol (or &quot;lot&quot; - lots of tears somewhere down the road).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Next comes fascism.  NO, we already have that&#8230;lol (or &#8220;lot&#8221; &#8211; lots of tears somewhere down the road).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeg3</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2010/01/banking-sector-remains-literally-unchanged/comment-page-1/#comment-245698</link>
		<dc:creator>jeg3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 16:41:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=48127#comment-245698</guid>
		<description>Your on a roll today BR, keep up the good work.

You forgot hypocrites:
http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2010/01/larry-summers-in-2000-healthy-financial.html

and

Thugs &amp; Con Artists
http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2009/12/will-americans-reclaim-our-nation-in.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your on a roll today BR, keep up the good work.</p>
<p>You forgot hypocrites:<br />
<a href="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2010/01/larry-summers-in-2000-healthy-financial.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2010/01/larry-summers-in-2000-healthy-financial.html</a></p>
<p>and</p>
<p>Thugs &amp; Con Artists<br />
<a href="http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2009/12/will-americans-reclaim-our-nation-in.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2009/12/will-americans-reclaim-our-nation-in.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

