AIG Doc SEC Dubbed “Confidential” Until 2018 (attached)

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - January 27th, 2010, 3:03PM

This is the document the Congressman was talking about during his opening remarks in today’s committee interviews —

It was dubbed confidential by the SEC at the NYFRB’s request until 2018, and subsequently uncovered via committee subpoena.

click for pdf

PDF here

Scribd Embed here

Hat tip Dylan!

UPDATE: Huff Po has more

Comments

Please use the comments to demonstrate your own ignorance, unfamiliarity with empirical data, ability to repeat discredited memes, and lack of respect for scientific knowledge. Also, be sure to create straw men and argue against things I have neither said nor even implied. Any irrelevancies you can mention will also be appreciated. Lastly, kindly forgo all civility in your discourse . . . you are, after all, anonymous.

49 Responses to “AIG Doc SEC Dubbed “Confidential” Until 2018 (attached)”

  1. batmando Says:

    Priceless comment on the HuffPo post:
    “Treachery Secretary Timothy Geithner”

  2. dead hobo Says:

    You bastard!

    You divulged confidential information that will surely destroy the economy, put helpless women and children into food lines, give aid and comfort to terrorists throughout the world, aid the liberal cause, and crush the financial markets now that These State Secrets are known publicly. Little old ladies who used to have savings accounts will now have to live on dried dog food until Death mercifully takes them to the other side. Have you no feeling? What the Hell is wrong with you?

    Pardon me while I go off to lament about the Horrors that will surely soon be facing us. Terrorist!

  3. hammerandtong2001 Says:

    So, this is the document the Fed “sealed” until 2018?

    And all these counterparties were made good at 100 cents on the dollar, courtesy of Joe & Jane Taxpayer.

    Hhmmm.

    .

  4. callistenes Says:

    Un Farkin Believable!

  5. Moss Says:

    The only secrets were the marks.

  6. ToNYC Says:

    Can you post this on line and/or with Markit and get real Markets? Free Markets for Free People.

  7. Transor Z Says:

    Wow! Unbelievable! Hooray, we’re saved!

    [Can anybody translate this shit for me?]

  8. Darkness Says:

    It sure seemed like we bailed out the European banking system. And lookie here. We did.

  9. bsneath Says:

    Hank never saw it.

  10. TakBak04 Says:

    Your request is being processed…

    David Fiderer
    David Fiderer

    How Paulson’s People Colluded With Goldman to Destroy AIG And Get A Backdoor Bailout

    Your request is being processed…

    David Fiderer

    Banker/Writer

    How Paulson’s People Colluded With Goldman to Destroy AIG And Get A Backdoor Bailout

    David Fiderer

    Banker/Writer

    Too Big To Fail is revelatory, though not in the way Andrew Ross Sorkin intended. The book offers startling evidence that Hank Paulson and his deputies colluded with Goldman to create a liquidity crisis at AIG, and to manipulate the government funding a backdoor bailout of AIG’s CDO counterparties, most notably Goldman. It’s not that Sorkin’s sources recounted the truth. Quite the opposite. Rather, they told him stories that were so transparently dishonest that the truth
    emerges by way of negative implication.

    To understand what happened, you need to remember that the top guys at Goldman are really, really smart. They are like champion chess players who anticipate the possible moves of their opponent. The guys at Goldman can quickly grasp how pieces of a financial transaction work together, like the pieces on a chessboard, to game out different scenarios. This attribute is not unique to the guys at Goldman; it’s an essential quality of every good banker. But it does mean that the guys at Goldman cannot credibly profess to being oblivious.

    The other thing that you must remember is that the dagger hanging over AIG and Goldman — the eventual payout to the CDO counterparties — was a zero-sum game between the two financial giants. On June 30, 2008, AIG’s net worth was $79 billion and its CDO obligations totaled $62 billion. On August 27, 2008 Goldman’s net worth was $42 billion and its share of the infamous CDO portfolio was $22 billion. The stakes were huge.

    More of article at….
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-fiderer/how-paulsons-people-collu_b_435549.html

  11. dead hobo Says:

    Transor Z Says:
    January 27th, 2010 at 4:21 pm

    Wow! Unbelievable! Hooray, we’re saved!

    [Can anybody translate this shit for me?]

    Yes:
    ———–
    Somebody paid too much for something and they need to keep it a secret for so long that nobody cares or they are long gone. It suggests the possibility of insider dealings or favors to friends. It implies that the DOJ can’t figure it out or hasn’t been forced to piss on somebody’s leg yet, and therefore someone or some group is home free if the statute of limitations expires before the shit hits the fan. Uncle Stupid is a willing conspirator in a cover-up of something yet to be explained.

  12. TakBak04 Says:

    Sorry about that garbled post…don’t know what happened. Anyway the article is an excellent read and easy to understand the step-by-step process of what went on between Goldman and AIG. For those of us who have trouble understanding the complications of the CDO’s and the financial transactions Fiderer walks the reader through so that most folks who aren’t traders can understand (finally) what was going on with the “Hair on Fire…Give Me Money Now” hysteria that Paulson and the rest were pushing to get our taxpayers dollars.

  13. alfred e Says:

    Well hurray. At least there are still some not willing to be co-conspirators.

    Ooops. Maybe one of those poor guys that got canned so that the elites could get their megabonuses ratted.

    Justice? Not yet. But if I were some of those fraudsters I might start having trouble sleeping well.

    Who knows what evil lurks in the form of documents and emails yet to be revealed.

    I’d say the SEC even with its new head is just about as useless as tits on a boar hog.
    But we pay their freight so they can “protect” us.

    I say sack ‘em all.

    And the FBI? Don’t bet on it. The head’s no idiot. BSO can be a master of subtle persuasion when he holds pocket resignations for all these bastards.

  14. dead hobo Says:

    TakBak04 Says:
    January 27th, 2010 at 4:38 pm

    … so that most folks who aren’t traders can understand (finally) what was going on with the “Hair on Fire…Give Me Money Now” hysteria that Paulson and the rest were pushing to get our taxpayers dollars.

    reply:
    ———
    They fooled me back then but now not so much. I no longer think that the world is so fragile that some bad news about a bank will ruin the world. If it can then the wrong people are running the world’s financial systems. Bernanke is a dolt who needs to be put in jail for criminal stupidity, although I’d settle for fired. Our national bankers need to be smarter since the thieves are so good at what they do. The stupid run the banks and are the regulators while the crooks hire the best and the brightest.

    In reality, nothing much will change and the next pump will come soon and will be a great opportunity. Of course, the world will end if the next pump doesn’t happen. Wall street will prosper and main street will exist.

  15. Transor Z Says:

    Uncle Stupid is a willing conspirator in a cover-up of something yet to be explained.

    @DH: I go on gut a lot and my gut tells me there’s truth in that sentence. Trying to teach myself the basics of structured finance on the fly so I can follow the game on the field just feels like I’m missing the forest for the trees.

    We still don’t know The Big Thing that Bernanke, Geithner, and Paulson are playing hide-the-ball and distancing themselves from. It definitely involves AIG. But we’re not there yet.

  16. ashpelham2 Says:

    Wow, they were really going to take a haircut. But it wasn’t so dire that they were going to recover nothing. Indeed, AIG was going to have to be broken apart, with the bad parts being worked on, while the good parts continuing to operate. Gross mismanagement at its worst, but not the end of the world, as we all knew then, and we still know now. For GOLDMAN, it was another story. So, who better to tell us the world is ending than a legacy Goldman guy? Damn, America is stoopid.

    Let this be a lesson to us all: real wealth and thereby freedom comes from a combination of skill and LUCK, with the latter being 70% of the equation. I hope LUCK is on each of your sides!

  17. willid3 Says:

    wonder if TG is cleaning out his desk? I am thinking O isn’t that lenient, not like B was any way. and maybe the big B isn’t going to confirmed after all?

  18. call me ahab Says:

    just paper-

    plenty more where that came from

  19. dead hobo Says:

    Transor Z Says:
    January 27th, 2010 at 4:56 pm

    We still don’t know The Big Thing that Bernanke, Geithner, and Paulson are playing hide-the-ball and distancing themselves from. It definitely involves AIG. But we’re not there yet.

    Reply:
    ————
    I’ve come to learn a simple truth … the explanation for complicated problems isn’t very complicated. In a lot of cases there really are simple answers for complicated questions.

    In this case …

    It’s easy to steal big if you have Government on your side. You put your people in Government, either by design or by putting stupid and easy to manipulate people in government. Bernanke is a good example of stupid and easy to manipulate. He has a dogmatic belief in the academic explanation of markets, he has a Pavlovian response to the great depression (free money and lots of it), and he is naive. He is easy to control. You confound the regulators by demanding fairness to financial innovation. You stall. The current hearing might even be a part of the stall since it is likely nothing of significance will happen due to them. You get the picture?

    It’s a simple problem and the government will never deal with it on the terms of main street. QE2 is on the way soon, to prevent the end of the world.

  20. Transor Z Says:

    Thomas Baxter’s testimony today on maintaining secrecy around Schedule-A:

    Cover to “explain” why the CC-rated holdings will be sold at a serious loss in 6-10 years and the taxpayer will lose money — because we’re going to be “gamed” by “sophisticated players” when the time comes.

    N.B. – All of his assertions on this p0int were qualified as being “what I am told by our experts at Blackrock.”

    CYA within CYA within CYA

    Cuz that’s how the big boys downtown roll.

  21. dead hobo Says:

    dead hobo Says:
    January 27th, 2010 at 5:14 pm

    It’s a simple problem and the government will never deal with it on the terms of main street. QE2 is on the way soon, to prevent the end of the world.

    PS:
    ———
    My timing usually sucks but my prognostications are spot on. Expect a double dip after QE1 times out and a heroic QE2 to save the world as a demanded response. Cha-Ching for Wall Street, and a U6 of 20%+

  22. Transor Z Says:

    @dh: All I can say is “good stuff.”

  23. KidDynamite Says:

    did Issa just release this on his own? that’s pretty shocking

  24. call me ahab Says:

    testimony- Geithner says:

    “I had no role in making decisions regarding what to disclose about the specific financial terms of Maiden Lane II and Maiden Lane III, and payments to AIGs counterparties.”

    testimony- Thomas Baxter- NY Fed General Counsel says-Geithner signed off on paying AIG counterparties at par.

    Geithner’s head explodes

  25. KidDynamite Says:

    ahab – geithner didn’t deny that he was a part of the decision to pay counterparties at par. he said he was not involved in the decisions about disclosing the counterparty payments

  26. call me ahab Says:

    KD-

    good point- but I wanted to fit that punch line in- best I could come up with

    DH says-

    “My timing usually sucks”

    but your picks are right?

    “heroic QE2 to save the world”

    I think they push to convert 401k’s and IRA’s to “safe” treasury accounts and slap 100% withdrawal penalties for all those who refuse to convert

  27. dead hobo Says:

    KidDynamite Says:
    January 27th, 2010 at 5:39 pm

    ahab – geithner didn’t deny that he was a part of the decision to pay counterparties at par. he said he was not involved in the decisions about disclosing the counterparty payments

    reply:
    ——–
    I did NOT shoot that gun. I denied it’s existence. I told my index finger to recuse the rest of my body. I had no idea my finger would pull that trigger. My finger is responsible for that crime, not me. I only knew about what my finger did well after the fact. I only wish I could have done something about it if I had only known. Bad finger.

  28. Darmah Says:

    I think what scared the crap out of them was the electronic bank run caused by Lehman’s collapse. Money market funds were hit hard and couldn’t hold the $1.00 share price. This would have started triggering all the counter-party bets. As I recall, it was happening quickly — program trading by stupid computers with as much intelligence as the people running these scams.

    Have I got this right?

  29. call me ahab Says:

    Darmah-

    so . . .armageddon because the MM would “break” the buck?

    and to think Berlin and Dresden made it-

    I guess obliteration by Soveit tanks and carpet bombing got nothing on fiat

  30. call me ahab Says:

    edit – Soviet

  31. The Window Washer Says:

    Which tranche was the best position for AIG’s counterparty?

    I printed this out when it went up, started reading it. Thought “which is the best possition” read half way through then realized I don’t have time for this today.
    Crisis porn will have to wait until late this evening. Hmmmm Crisis Porn, by now it’s kind of like a copy of playboy from the month you we’re born.

    Can anyone satisfy me before then.

    Were all these positions created when the CDO created or later?
    Are these the original counterparties?
    ec…..

    Bit more work than first glance.

  32. Darmah Says:

    ahab – I may have some of this wrong. The electronic run was on bonds; bonds supporting money market funds. Funds were started to crack below $1. The selling would have started triggering the side bets or insurance or whatever you want to call it (rich-pricks-getting-richer-for-productive-reason methinks).

    So, not the breaking the buck; just all the selling of the bonds/securities.

    That’s kinda my understanding of what freaked them out. Of course I could easily be completely wrong.

  33. TakBak04 Says:

    If you haven’t read it…Read THIS…it’s a good PRIMER for what BR posted: Or Bookmark it and read over weekend or downtime. It’s a Good One!

    —–

    How Paulson’s People Colluded With Goldman to Destroy AIG And Get A Backdoor Bailout by David Fiderer
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-fiderer/how-paulsons-people-collu_b_435549.html

  34. The Window Washer Says:

    Can someone in the biz answer a question about page 3.

    All those small positions on lower trances of the same deal jump out as looking like part of one of those “side letter” agreements that were never meant to be honored. So your risk profile would look better.

  35. vachon Says:

    ZH is doing the reverse-engineering on it. Pretty innaresting.

  36. call me ahab Says:

    Dharma-

    you’re right- by breaking the buck – panic runs on money market funds occurred and the find manager’s had to liquidate assets to cover redemptions-

    sure is a good thing that may be a thing of the past- in the new financial regultions being proposed- fund managers can refuse redemptions if they think it is harmful to the fund- don’t remember the precise language- but anyway-

    good luck to anyone trying to get their money out

  37. The Window Washer Says:

    vachon,

    Thanks, looks like it will take a while to go through it.
    Do you want to bet everyone will just keep screaming “Evil GS!!!!!!”. Everyone else on this list is loving GS hate mongering right now. GS going private isn’t a far ferched as it was a couple months ago.

    The outrage here is that this market blew up in Feb 07. I stopped watching Markit’s ABX by May 07.
    Over a year and a half to deal with the problem and nothing happened.

  38. larry Says:

    @dead hobo

    You know, information like this would be considered state secrets in China.

    Then again, basic economic data is a state secret in China.

  39. The Window Washer Says:

    ZH’s point on the amortorization is the type of thing that is fucking crazy.
    What monkey was writing the checks over there?
    One without pants I presume.

  40. torrie-amos Says:

    well, if the department of justice, ie, mr holder is not on this in a week, we know who does really run the gubment……………………..the fed bought the crappiest of crap at full price, goldman should be broken up, this is as bad as enron and arthur anderson

  41. Tarkus Says:

    “The way the AIG bailout was engineered was to specifically benefit Goldman Sachs and its trading partners,” said Janet Tavakoli, a Chicago-based derivatives expert and founder of Tavakoli Structured Finance. “Goldman’s past and present officers used crony capitalism to put their own interests ahead of the public.

    Can’t we get Hank Paulson and Janet Tavakoli on the same stage at the same time in front of an audience so we can hear both sides of their arguments? (How about online if not on stage?)

  42. torrie-amos Says:

    huffington post, we paid 14 billion for shit that was worth 6 billion, in that year goldman made 1.8 billion, what does that tell you, without that bailout goldman is down and out and dead headed into the ground like wiley coyote’

  43. km4 Says:

    I would argue that the most serious threat to the United States is not someone hiding in a cave in Afghanistan or Pakistan, but our own fiscal irresponsibility
    —David Walker, former comptroller of the United States
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UuCgxDbOgqM

  44. TakBak04 Says:

    @willid3 Says:
    January 27th, 2010 at 5:11 pm

    wonder if TG is cleaning out his desk? I am thinking O isn’t that lenient, not like B was any way. and maybe the big B isn’t going to confirmed after all?

    ——-

    Sorry to say this…but if I was a jury member and Geithner was on trial for a some trivial offense…..just his body language and obfuscation of his role in all of this would have me questioning anything out of his mouth…and I would probably vote to CONVICT!

    Now…I have to pull back and wonder if he’s really just a guy who doesn’t know the meaning of “ethics” and doesn’t know what “moral compass” in dealing through one’s life and figure he needs a pass. But, does being “clueless” mean that one isn’t ever held accountable for ANYTHING these days?

    Maybe I’m “old school.” Grandpa said: “A man’s word is his honor.” I think Granpa was living in a different time when trading a cow or horse meant a “handshake was a bond” and if the guy F**ked You….then you got the gun and went after him.

    These days…we don’t have that kind of system and we are much more sophisticated in how we bring people to justice.

    WHERE IS THE the JUSTICE for ANY of these folks who STOLE OUR MONEY?

    Geithner is a Poster Boy for the “twitchy, grimacing criminal….hiding his avarice and greed under a (who did this “not me! “) attitude which leaves open that he is being “wrongfully set up” for the misdeeds of others… It’s been the defense of clever folks for centuries. Should we really go against a guy who is so totally “clueless” he doesn’t know how bad he f**ked up….when in fact TIMMEH would say: “Others were involved and we were SAVING AMERICA!” It’s the defense we’ve been hearing a lot of for the last decade. “Who Could Have Known?” Remember that one.

  45. alfred e Says:

    @takbak04: No prosecution. Timmy is an elite. Jail time? No way. Tax evasion. Ooops. No fine or penalty.

    Trial? Don’t think so.

    He does what he deems in his best interests and those of his capos. And because he’s a VIP. That’s all that matters. He is smart enough to leave a minimal trail (leave the meeting). But my sense is someone’s got the goods. Just not enough money or jail time on the table yet.

    The way it works in Chicago, the city that works, ask BSO, you have to nail a smaller guy, and then get him to spill on the big guy. But only after he gets protection, including an identity change, and his own Caribbean island. Because the big guys don’t take prisoners. Just ask Foster.

    AS MEH would say: x2 for Paulsen.

    Be interesting to see if the TV drama results in more than higher ratings.

  46. The Window Washer Says:

    DeadHobo

    “They fooled me back then but now not so much. I no longer think that the world is so fragile that some bad news about a bank will ruin the world. ”

    do you remember the week the Commercial Paper market disappeared?

  47. TakBak04 Says:

    @alfred e Says:

    Be interesting to see if the TV drama results in more than higher ratings.

    ———

    Truly…that’s what it’s all about…and maybe Timmeh goes home and watches those “Reality Shows” just to get a break from it all…and he’s just acting out a part in all of this that goes just the way you say. A “book contract” on “How I got Wronged” and a side deal with his wife and child about how his “reputation was ruined…when all I was doing was Saving America!”

    It’s kind of how things work these days…but it doesn’t mean that the “rest of us” have to tolerate it by giving up and joining in with them…or becoming so cynical we just give up and snark, either.

    Who knows.. More and more keeps bubbling out of our sewers about what’s been going on. People will make of it what they will. But, APATHY is the ENEMY of making things work again…is what I think.

  48. How the Common Man Sees It Says:

    Maybe they should just nationalize Goldman. With the profits they are making the government books would be balanced in a couple years

  49. ZackAttack Says:

    >>> maybe Timmeh goes home and watches those “Reality Shows” just to get a break from it all…

    I would suggest “Pawn Stars.” Serious allegory on the ability to judge the value of collateral. Watch it and laugh at two levels.

95 queries. 0.465 seconds.