<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Decade Ahead In Jobs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2010/01/the-decade-ahead-in-jobs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2010/01/the-decade-ahead-in-jobs/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:26:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Future of Employment in the Decade Ahead &#124; FlowingData</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2010/01/the-decade-ahead-in-jobs/comment-page-1/#comment-252283</link>
		<dc:creator>Future of Employment in the Decade Ahead &#124; FlowingData</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 08:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=49466#comment-252283</guid>
		<description>[...] The Big Picture &#124; Thanks, Barry] AKPC_IDS += &quot;5096,&quot;;Subscribe to the FlowingData RSS feed to stay updated on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Big Picture | Thanks, Barry] AKPC_IDS += &quot;5096,&quot;;Subscribe to the FlowingData RSS feed to stay updated on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kort</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2010/01/the-decade-ahead-in-jobs/comment-page-1/#comment-248562</link>
		<dc:creator>Kort</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 17:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=49466#comment-248562</guid>
		<description>Once you put in a government healthcare option, or an exchange, or a &quot;whatever&quot;, you free the employee from the Company.  So many people work today just for healthcare---and they work hard to keep their jobs, and healthcare.  As the link between company and healthcare goes away, you will have more people floating around, in and out of the workforce.  People, a Gen X, Gen Y, Millenium Gen, whatver Gen---as time passes, less reliance on the Company.  More reliance on a social safety net.

Good, or bad, not sure.  Check back in 30 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once you put in a government healthcare option, or an exchange, or a &#8220;whatever&#8221;, you free the employee from the Company.  So many people work today just for healthcare&#8212;and they work hard to keep their jobs, and healthcare.  As the link between company and healthcare goes away, you will have more people floating around, in and out of the workforce.  People, a Gen X, Gen Y, Millenium Gen, whatver Gen&#8212;as time passes, less reliance on the Company.  More reliance on a social safety net.</p>
<p>Good, or bad, not sure.  Check back in 30 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bdg123</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2010/01/the-decade-ahead-in-jobs/comment-page-1/#comment-248523</link>
		<dc:creator>bdg123</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 14:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=49466#comment-248523</guid>
		<description>If that is the way our economy will look in ten years, God help us.  But then that won&#039;t be the way it looks.  Whoever put that together simply used linear extrapolation on their $2.99 Walmart calculator.  If we don&#039;t realize by now (With all of Wall Street&#039;s similar extrapolations) that the world is a tad more complex than that..........

Keep that graphic and let&#039;s look back in ten years to see how accurate they were.  Not very.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If that is the way our economy will look in ten years, God help us.  But then that won&#8217;t be the way it looks.  Whoever put that together simply used linear extrapolation on their $2.99 Walmart calculator.  If we don&#8217;t realize by now (With all of Wall Street&#8217;s similar extrapolations) that the world is a tad more complex than that&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
<p>Keep that graphic and let&#8217;s look back in ten years to see how accurate they were.  Not very.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: logical Empiricist</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2010/01/the-decade-ahead-in-jobs/comment-page-1/#comment-248512</link>
		<dc:creator>logical Empiricist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 13:36:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=49466#comment-248512</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately, the methodology for this is based on the past.  They do not attempt to account for the up and downs in the economy.   I worked with an economist, who knew the methodology and did not think either the national or the statewide projections were worth much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, the methodology for this is based on the past.  They do not attempt to account for the up and downs in the economy.   I worked with an economist, who knew the methodology and did not think either the national or the statewide projections were worth much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dismal</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2010/01/the-decade-ahead-in-jobs/comment-page-1/#comment-248494</link>
		<dc:creator>dismal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 06:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=49466#comment-248494</guid>
		<description>Won&#039;t this be funny to laugh at in ten years!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Won&#8217;t this be funny to laugh at in ten years!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: awells1902</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2010/01/the-decade-ahead-in-jobs/comment-page-1/#comment-248487</link>
		<dc:creator>awells1902</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 05:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=49466#comment-248487</guid>
		<description>Employment services going up 19.2 % when overall employment will go up 10.5 %? Healthcare up 22.5%, as if it is not bankrupting the country at present levels already? Banking up 7.9%? I guess it is possible, if the gaming industry will be officially included in the sector! And on, and on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Employment services going up 19.2 % when overall employment will go up 10.5 %? Healthcare up 22.5%, as if it is not bankrupting the country at present levels already? Banking up 7.9%? I guess it is possible, if the gaming industry will be officially included in the sector! And on, and on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: muckdog</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2010/01/the-decade-ahead-in-jobs/comment-page-1/#comment-248485</link>
		<dc:creator>muckdog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 05:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=49466#comment-248485</guid>
		<description>The one thing we know for sure, is that these forecasts will be wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The one thing we know for sure, is that these forecasts will be wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: some_guy_in_a_cube</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2010/01/the-decade-ahead-in-jobs/comment-page-1/#comment-248482</link>
		<dc:creator>some_guy_in_a_cube</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 04:15:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=49466#comment-248482</guid>
		<description>Like most 10-year forecasts, good for a laugh 10 years from now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like most 10-year forecasts, good for a laugh 10 years from now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark E Hoffer</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2010/01/the-decade-ahead-in-jobs/comment-page-1/#comment-248468</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark E Hoffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 01:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=49466#comment-248468</guid>
		<description>mobiaxis, 

yes, no doubt, though, before the &quot;domestic servant robots&quot;, there will be a, somewhat, similiar demand for such occupations--required to roll out the 24x7=168. Track n&#039; Trace &#039;Economy&#039;..

see: Houston Police Department UAV 
http://cryptogon.com/?p=12968

as one facet of the coming festivities..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mobiaxis, </p>
<p>yes, no doubt, though, before the &#8220;domestic servant robots&#8221;, there will be a, somewhat, similiar demand for such occupations&#8211;required to roll out the 24&#215;7=168. Track n&#8217; Trace &#8216;Economy&#8217;..</p>
<p>see: Houston Police Department UAV<br />
<a href="http://cryptogon.com/?p=12968" rel="nofollow">http://cryptogon.com/?p=12968</a></p>
<p>as one facet of the coming festivities..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: willid3</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2010/01/the-decade-ahead-in-jobs/comment-page-1/#comment-248448</link>
		<dc:creator>willid3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 22:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=49466#comment-248448</guid>
		<description>paul jones so that what they were talking about when they kept telling us new jobs were coming!
must still be hung up in development. though i hear Honda is working hard on the project!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>paul jones so that what they were talking about when they kept telling us new jobs were coming!<br />
must still be hung up in development. though i hear Honda is working hard on the project!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

