<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Banker&#8217;s Progress</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2010/03/bankers-progress/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2010/03/bankers-progress/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:30:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: budhak0n</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2010/03/bankers-progress/comment-page-1/#comment-258264</link>
		<dc:creator>budhak0n</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 14:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=52934#comment-258264</guid>
		<description>A perfect description.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A perfect description.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rktbrkr</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2010/03/bankers-progress/comment-page-1/#comment-258258</link>
		<dc:creator>rktbrkr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 13:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=52934#comment-258258</guid>
		<description>2009 was was a very good year.

Central bankers moved heaven and earth to save their codependents and this entitled their execs to bonuses of course. Time to storm the castle!

 March 2 (Bloomberg) -- Chancellor of the Exchequer Alistair Darling urged pay restraint and moderation from U.K. banks, and still they raised compensation.

Barclays Capital, the investment-banking unit of Barclays Plc, increased its pay and bonuses per employee by about 93 percent in 2009, according to company filings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2009 was was a very good year.</p>
<p>Central bankers moved heaven and earth to save their codependents and this entitled their execs to bonuses of course. Time to storm the castle!</p>
<p> March 2 (Bloomberg) &#8212; Chancellor of the Exchequer Alistair Darling urged pay restraint and moderation from U.K. banks, and still they raised compensation.</p>
<p>Barclays Capital, the investment-banking unit of Barclays Plc, increased its pay and bonuses per employee by about 93 percent in 2009, according to company filings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rktbrkr</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2010/03/bankers-progress/comment-page-1/#comment-258257</link>
		<dc:creator>rktbrkr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 13:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=52934#comment-258257</guid>
		<description>March 2 (Bloomberg) -- GMAC Inc., the auto and home lender that hasn’t cracked a profit since 2008, gave Chief Executive Officer Michael Carpenter a pay package rivaling that of Goldman Sachs Group Inc. CEO Lloyd Blankfein, who runs the most profitable securities firm in U.S. history.

GMAC paid Carpenter about $1.2 million for the month-and-a- half he was employed by the Detroit-based company last year, equivalent to full-year pay of $9.5 million, according to a regulatory filing today. Goldman Sachs paid Blankfein $9.6 million for 2009. 

GMAC isn&#039;t even a real bank, they morphed into a bank to get US bailouts and now they&#039;re one of the immortal 19 and shit like this still happens. They should have gone into BK nad been liquidated</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>March 2 (Bloomberg) &#8212; GMAC Inc., the auto and home lender that hasn’t cracked a profit since 2008, gave Chief Executive Officer Michael Carpenter a pay package rivaling that of Goldman Sachs Group Inc. CEO Lloyd Blankfein, who runs the most profitable securities firm in U.S. history.</p>
<p>GMAC paid Carpenter about $1.2 million for the month-and-a- half he was employed by the Detroit-based company last year, equivalent to full-year pay of $9.5 million, according to a regulatory filing today. Goldman Sachs paid Blankfein $9.6 million for 2009. </p>
<p>GMAC isn&#8217;t even a real bank, they morphed into a bank to get US bailouts and now they&#8217;re one of the immortal 19 and shit like this still happens. They should have gone into BK nad been liquidated</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FT Alphaville &#187; Further reading</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2010/03/bankers-progress/comment-page-1/#comment-258235</link>
		<dc:creator>FT Alphaville &#187; Further reading</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 08:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=52934#comment-258235</guid>
		<description>[...] - A banker&#8217;s progress. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8211; A banker&#8217;s progress. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GrafSchweik</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2010/03/bankers-progress/comment-page-1/#comment-258211</link>
		<dc:creator>GrafSchweik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 04:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=52934#comment-258211</guid>
		<description>@ Cynic

Amen!!

If I were still working for the Bank-That-Shall-Not-Be-Named, this would be up on my cubicle wall in the morning where it would find a comfortable home with several dozen Dilbert strips. 

When I worked there I could always tell who the realists were by the number of Dilberts posted at their work stations. I mentioned this to a friend who does a lot of consulting work in the EU and he told me of a friend and sometimes colleague who has developed a basic Dilbert Index which he determines when he goes into a firm for the first time. 

The more Dilberts he sees posted, the bigger the trouble the company is in.  It has not failed him yet. 

What I don&#039;t know is whether he bothers to do a detailed analysis as to whether particular Dilbert strips preponderate and, if they do, whether they indicate those parts of the company most in need of sorting out... 

So it goes...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Cynic</p>
<p>Amen!!</p>
<p>If I were still working for the Bank-That-Shall-Not-Be-Named, this would be up on my cubicle wall in the morning where it would find a comfortable home with several dozen Dilbert strips. </p>
<p>When I worked there I could always tell who the realists were by the number of Dilberts posted at their work stations. I mentioned this to a friend who does a lot of consulting work in the EU and he told me of a friend and sometimes colleague who has developed a basic Dilbert Index which he determines when he goes into a firm for the first time. </p>
<p>The more Dilberts he sees posted, the bigger the trouble the company is in.  It has not failed him yet. </p>
<p>What I don&#8217;t know is whether he bothers to do a detailed analysis as to whether particular Dilbert strips preponderate and, if they do, whether they indicate those parts of the company most in need of sorting out&#8230; </p>
<p>So it goes&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cynic_FA</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2010/03/bankers-progress/comment-page-1/#comment-258201</link>
		<dc:creator>Cynic_FA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 02:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=52934#comment-258201</guid>
		<description>Oh Well! Another day another $200,000 (if you&#039;re a GS banker)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh Well! Another day another $200,000 (if you&#8217;re a GS banker)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cynic_FA</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2010/03/bankers-progress/comment-page-1/#comment-258200</link>
		<dc:creator>Cynic_FA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 01:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=52934#comment-258200</guid>
		<description>Oh Well! Another day another $200,000 (if your a GS banker)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh Well! Another day another $200,000 (if your a GS banker)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

