Congratulations to this year’s Pulitzer prize winners:

• The Washington Post won four Pulitzers;
• The New York Times won three;
• ProPublica became the first online, nonprofit news organization to win;
• Liaquat Ahamed for the historical work “Lords of Finance: The Bankers Who Broke the World; (NYT review here)

Category: Financial Press, Markets

Please use the comments to demonstrate your own ignorance, unfamiliarity with empirical data and lack of respect for scientific knowledge. Be sure to create straw men and argue against things I have neither said nor implied. If you could repeat previously discredited memes or steer the conversation into irrelevant, off topic discussions, it would be appreciated. Lastly, kindly forgo all civility in your discourse . . . you are, after all, anonymous.

4 Responses to “Pulitzers to WaPo, NYT, Prop Publica, Liaquat Ahamed”

  1. Mike in Nola says:

    Well, I guess you can’t win ‘em all :(

    I did like the last one, though. It was written like most good history books, by fleshing out the personal lives of the main players.

  2. cheese says:

    I guess cynics and laymen alike would’ve been shocked if the National Enquirer won. Can’t say they didn’t earn one.

  3. S Brennan says:

    I followed the link to Liaquat Ahamed and read an interesting piece of idiocy…yep people in Floridan and California caused this mess…my country is doomed

  4. Greg0658 says:

    does a blog and a book full of dug up crud get you a nomination? does someone inside need to nominate the reporter? union dues into ____?

    BR – I caught you in ABC reruns while surfing – glad to see your still healthy & succinct – demo tape?
    Not sure you wanna go there – blog on David Shuster released while demo’g for CNN: