1982 Buffett letter to Cong. Dingell on Derivatives

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - May 27th, 2010, 6:58AM

Another Buffett hypocrisy alert!

This 1982 letter that inveighs against the use of index derivatives.  Recenlty Buffett heavily lobbied Congress to exclude provisions in the financial reform bill that would force Berkshire to pony up more capital for its short index derivative (puts) position… courtesy of Forbes:

1982 Buffet Letter

Comments

Please use the comments to demonstrate your own ignorance, unfamiliarity with empirical data, ability to repeat discredited memes, and lack of respect for scientific knowledge. Also, be sure to create straw men and argue against things I have neither said nor even implied. Any irrelevancies you can mention will also be appreciated. Lastly, kindly forgo all civility in your discourse . . . you are, after all, anonymous.

2 Responses to “1982 Buffett letter to Cong. Dingell on Derivatives”

  1. Denis Says:

    Oh come on… Hypocrisy? Haven’t you ever changed your mind over the course of a conversation? How about over the course of 30 years? You know… going something like: “Ok, you make sense and I don’t!”

  2. martin b roberts Says:

    I have to agree with Denis here. In addition to the 25 year time difference, Buffet is talking about futures in 1982, so mostly maximum 1 year contracts, and what he sold was 13 and 18 year puts on the S&P in 2007 iirc. You can’t conflate his argument for futures being short term gambling mechanisms to include a more than decade long position.

49 queries. 0.338 seconds.