<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Color as a Global Business Identity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2010/07/color-as-a-global-business-identity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2010/07/color-as-a-global-business-identity/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 21:38:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: formerlawyer</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2010/07/color-as-a-global-business-identity/comment-page-1/#comment-359330</link>
		<dc:creator>formerlawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 05:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=57837#comment-359330</guid>
		<description>dsawy:

I agree. 

What about Caterpillar yellow? They must be some 60 years or so.

What about Coca-Cola red? They must be 100 years or so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dsawy:</p>
<p>I agree. </p>
<p>What about Caterpillar yellow? They must be some 60 years or so.</p>
<p>What about Coca-Cola red? They must be 100 years or so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dsawy</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2010/07/color-as-a-global-business-identity/comment-page-1/#comment-359033</link>
		<dc:creator>dsawy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 19:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=57837#comment-359033</guid>
		<description>Left out are some of the longest running color branding schemes out there: Deere and IBM. Deere&#039;s color scheme has been around about a century now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Left out are some of the longest running color branding schemes out there: Deere and IBM. Deere&#8217;s color scheme has been around about a century now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: napster</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2010/07/color-as-a-global-business-identity/comment-page-1/#comment-358380</link>
		<dc:creator>napster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 23:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=57837#comment-358380</guid>
		<description>@hammer,

Yea, I agree that the symbol of Apple has a visual potency, no less than many other business icons that have abounded (I mentioned the Nike symbol earlier).  But Apple backed that image up with reliable computer systems that don&#039;t suck.  I wonder what the wastebasket of old logos and icons might be.

Your examples have counter-examples, which I think somewhat diminishes their generalized potential.  Hyundai, Honda, Toyota, Volvo, Mercedes-Benz, Jaguars, Fords, Mazdas all have easy to remember symbols because we see them frequently.  People buy Honda&#039;s and Toyotas not because of the symbol, but because of the history of quality vehicles.  The same is with beer, as well as most consumption items.  It is the mythology of association that advertising creates, and this creation is independent of any other symbolic reference.

Combine symbols and mythology ... watch out.   You get evangelical christianity  .   :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@hammer,</p>
<p>Yea, I agree that the symbol of Apple has a visual potency, no less than many other business icons that have abounded (I mentioned the Nike symbol earlier).  But Apple backed that image up with reliable computer systems that don&#8217;t suck.  I wonder what the wastebasket of old logos and icons might be.</p>
<p>Your examples have counter-examples, which I think somewhat diminishes their generalized potential.  Hyundai, Honda, Toyota, Volvo, Mercedes-Benz, Jaguars, Fords, Mazdas all have easy to remember symbols because we see them frequently.  People buy Honda&#8217;s and Toyotas not because of the symbol, but because of the history of quality vehicles.  The same is with beer, as well as most consumption items.  It is the mythology of association that advertising creates, and this creation is independent of any other symbolic reference.</p>
<p>Combine symbols and mythology &#8230; watch out.   You get evangelical christianity  .   :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: napster</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2010/07/color-as-a-global-business-identity/comment-page-1/#comment-358368</link>
		<dc:creator>napster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 23:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=57837#comment-358368</guid>
		<description>@ewmayer

I think I understand what you mean
trying all hard not to be obscene
but what I meant by off-color
was something quite other
then you prancing around like a queen.

:-)

Peace out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ewmayer</p>
<p>I think I understand what you mean<br />
trying all hard not to be obscene<br />
but what I meant by off-color<br />
was something quite other<br />
then you prancing around like a queen.</p>
<p>:-)</p>
<p>Peace out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hammerandtong2001</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2010/07/color-as-a-global-business-identity/comment-page-1/#comment-358347</link>
		<dc:creator>hammerandtong2001</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 22:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=57837#comment-358347</guid>
		<description>The psychology and physiology of color perception, it&#039;s utility in branding and identity functions is a critically important art which bears directly on &quot;brand value&quot; -- the &quot;intangible assets&quot; on one&#039;s balance sheet.

It was not that long ago that Forbes magazine named &quot;Marlboro&quot; as the single most valuable brand in the world.  Well north of $50 Billion.  And of course, today, there are large tracts of the golbe where one can trade a pack of Marlboro Reds for whatever the market will bear --

As just one example, Philip Morris spent $millions perfecting and honing a singular brand identity for their most valuable product.  

Today, this is an art form and identity management capability that has been relegated to outsourced manpower, and why so many &quot;brands&quot; today lack the visual authority and mindspace relevance needed to drive value.

What do you think of when you hear &quot;Chevy&quot;

What do you think of when you hear &quot;Bud&quot;

Now --

Think of &quot;Apple&quot;

And that&#039;s the difference.  

.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The psychology and physiology of color perception, it&#8217;s utility in branding and identity functions is a critically important art which bears directly on &#8220;brand value&#8221; &#8212; the &#8220;intangible assets&#8221; on one&#8217;s balance sheet.</p>
<p>It was not that long ago that Forbes magazine named &#8220;Marlboro&#8221; as the single most valuable brand in the world.  Well north of $50 Billion.  And of course, today, there are large tracts of the golbe where one can trade a pack of Marlboro Reds for whatever the market will bear &#8211;</p>
<p>As just one example, Philip Morris spent $millions perfecting and honing a singular brand identity for their most valuable product.  </p>
<p>Today, this is an art form and identity management capability that has been relegated to outsourced manpower, and why so many &#8220;brands&#8221; today lack the visual authority and mindspace relevance needed to drive value.</p>
<p>What do you think of when you hear &#8220;Chevy&#8221;</p>
<p>What do you think of when you hear &#8220;Bud&#8221;</p>
<p>Now &#8211;</p>
<p>Think of &#8220;Apple&#8221;</p>
<p>And that&#8217;s the difference.  </p>
<p>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ewmayer</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2010/07/color-as-a-global-business-identity/comment-page-1/#comment-358262</link>
		<dc:creator>ewmayer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 20:48:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=57837#comment-358262</guid>
		<description>@napster:

&quot;You put 8 off-color cards in an order of preference.&quot;

Off-color ... you mean, with naughty phrases or ribald limericks written on them?

There once was a man of Madras,
Whose balls were made of pure brass.
When jangled together,
They played &quot;Stormy Weather&quot;,
And lightning shot out of his ass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@napster:</p>
<p>&#8220;You put 8 off-color cards in an order of preference.&#8221;</p>
<p>Off-color &#8230; you mean, with naughty phrases or ribald limericks written on them?</p>
<p>There once was a man of Madras,<br />
Whose balls were made of pure brass.<br />
When jangled together,<br />
They played &#8220;Stormy Weather&#8221;,<br />
And lightning shot out of his ass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darmah</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2010/07/color-as-a-global-business-identity/comment-page-1/#comment-358255</link>
		<dc:creator>Darmah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 20:41:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=57837#comment-358255</guid>
		<description>Where the hell is Big Blue in all of this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where the hell is Big Blue in all of this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: napster</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2010/07/color-as-a-global-business-identity/comment-page-1/#comment-358238</link>
		<dc:creator>napster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 20:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=57837#comment-358238</guid>
		<description>@dead hobo:

Yea, I agree.  Too too much is conjectured about advertising.  Blasting people with commercials of skits and repeated sound-bytes is more effective than color in today&#039;s instant video world.

They think they can market anything with advertising.  For example:  what the hell is &quot;Muscle Milk&quot; ?  The street sign ad says I can go from Bland to Bootylicous by drinking this stuff.  Seriously, is that supposed to make me change my routine and choice of drinking beverages?  

Go back 30 years and look at all the failed marketing efforts and dead products despite the stream of adverts.  

And look at Nike.  It&#039;s symbol is everywhere, from hats and catcher&#039;s mitts, to billboards and &quot;just do it&quot; commercials.  All of it so that you don&#039;t forget Nike.  It creates a normative reference since tennis shoes are really not that much different, gaining strength by association with sports stars because if the commercials go into your brain, your brain has created a memory that pops up when you see the Nike symbol.

The color of the Nike symbol is not the association.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@dead hobo:</p>
<p>Yea, I agree.  Too too much is conjectured about advertising.  Blasting people with commercials of skits and repeated sound-bytes is more effective than color in today&#8217;s instant video world.</p>
<p>They think they can market anything with advertising.  For example:  what the hell is &#8220;Muscle Milk&#8221; ?  The street sign ad says I can go from Bland to Bootylicous by drinking this stuff.  Seriously, is that supposed to make me change my routine and choice of drinking beverages?  </p>
<p>Go back 30 years and look at all the failed marketing efforts and dead products despite the stream of adverts.  </p>
<p>And look at Nike.  It&#8217;s symbol is everywhere, from hats and catcher&#8217;s mitts, to billboards and &#8220;just do it&#8221; commercials.  All of it so that you don&#8217;t forget Nike.  It creates a normative reference since tennis shoes are really not that much different, gaining strength by association with sports stars because if the commercials go into your brain, your brain has created a memory that pops up when you see the Nike symbol.</p>
<p>The color of the Nike symbol is not the association.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: napster</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2010/07/color-as-a-global-business-identity/comment-page-1/#comment-358230</link>
		<dc:creator>napster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 20:20:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=57837#comment-358230</guid>
		<description>I found out the name.  It&#039;s called the Luscher Test.  Here is another link for this kinda stuff.

http://www.colour-experience.org/matching/matcol_psych_tests/matcol_psych_test1.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found out the name.  It&#8217;s called the Luscher Test.  Here is another link for this kinda stuff.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.colour-experience.org/matching/matcol_psych_tests/matcol_psych_test1.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.colour-experience.org/matching/matcol_psych_tests/matcol_psych_test1.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dead hobo</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2010/07/color-as-a-global-business-identity/comment-page-1/#comment-358229</link>
		<dc:creator>dead hobo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 20:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=57837#comment-358229</guid>
		<description>BR asked:

Can you “Name That Brand” by color alone?

reply:
-----------
No. I can probably get a few logos right. I mostly don&#039;t care. I know a lot of corporate types agonize about the right shade of red that is needed to blow the beejeezus out of sales, and I believe some real fights break out over it. Some poor souls surely  go home crying over the fights, worrying about whether or not their boss might seek retribution over their favor of one color or shade over another in opposition to one preferred by the team.

I really don&#039;t care. While I&#039;m certainly glad that pepsi or coke don&#039;t carry black box warnings, and I am probably glad that neither try to confuse me with plaid or anything new on the bottles and cans, Mediocrity is good for everyone else. They appear to agree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BR asked:</p>
<p>Can you “Name That Brand” by color alone?</p>
<p>reply:<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
No. I can probably get a few logos right. I mostly don&#8217;t care. I know a lot of corporate types agonize about the right shade of red that is needed to blow the beejeezus out of sales, and I believe some real fights break out over it. Some poor souls surely  go home crying over the fights, worrying about whether or not their boss might seek retribution over their favor of one color or shade over another in opposition to one preferred by the team.</p>
<p>I really don&#8217;t care. While I&#8217;m certainly glad that pepsi or coke don&#8217;t carry black box warnings, and I am probably glad that neither try to confuse me with plaid or anything new on the bottles and cans, Mediocrity is good for everyone else. They appear to agree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

