Tax Cut Changes

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - August 18th, 2010, 5:30PM


chart courtesy of CNN/Money
>

This chart is pretty stark in terms of who gets hit the hardest in the expiration of the Bush Tax cuts.

But this comparisons isn’t all that informative — how many of each of these taxpayers are there? What is the total amount of tax dollars collected in each grouping? Each bracket? How is this apportioned across the entire tax base? How does this compare relative to all of the tax cuts received since 2001-03?

The article adds a little color noting the following changes:

-If you make $382,650 you’ll owe an extra $4,095 in income tax.
-Single filers with $500,000 in taxable income would owe Uncle Sam an additional $9,492 from this year’s tax bill.
-Joint filers with taxable income of $700,000 would owe an extra $17,088
-$1 million dollars in taxable income = $32,493 more

I found the Washington Post chart (mentioned here) somewhat more informative than the chart above in terms of comparing the GOP and Democratic plans side by side in terms of brackets — but just as lacking terms of distribution of  taxes across the entire taxpaying public . . .

>

Previously:
A Closer Look at the Bush Tax Cuts (August 13th, 2010)

Source:
Higher taxes for the rich: What they’ll pay
Blake Ellis,
CNN, August 18, 2010
http://money.cnn.com/2010/08/18/pf/taxes/bush_tax_cuts_rich/index.htm

Kyle Bass Investment & Market Ideas

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - August 18th, 2010, 4:14PM

David Faber and the Strategy Session crew discuss today’s top story and keep you ahead of the money. They’re joined by hedge fund manager Kyle Bass, managing partner at Hayman Investments.



Airtime: Tues. Aug. 17 2010 | 12:01 PM ET

~~~

Hedge fund manager Kyle Bass, managing partner at Hayman Investments, shares his market outlook and investment ideas with the Strategy Session crew.



Airtime: Tues. Aug. 17 2010 | 12:15 PM ET

Druckenmiller Retires

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - August 18th, 2010, 2:00PM

Druckenmiller August 2010 Letter to Investors

Do US Bonds Resemble Dot Com Stocks?

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - August 18th, 2010, 12:00PM

Over the past few months, I have been saying US Treasuries remind me of the dot com stocks circa 1997-98 in three ways:

1) You knew momentum was taking them (much) higher;
2) You knew it was going to end badly;
3) If you were honest, you admitted you had precisely zero idea when the day of reckoning would be.

I mentioned this at the Agora conference last month, and again on Fast Money last night and Bloomberg radio this morning.

What made the dot com situation so pernicious was that anyone who was judged on relative performance (i.e., Mutual fund managers), were all but forced into these names in order to keep up. Very few people — Buffett and Grantham come to mind — manged to both avoid both chasing these names and losing their client base.

Tobias Levkovich, Citigroup’s chief U.S. equity strategist, mentions something quite similar in the Bloomberg Chart of Day:

>


Chart courtesy of Bloomberg

>

Here is Dave Wilson:

“U.S. bonds may be just as vulnerable to a plunge as stocks were a decade ago, when the Internet bubble burst, according to Tobias Levkovich, Citigroup Inc.’s chief U.S. equity strategist.

The CHART OF THE DAY depicts how an index of monthly returns on 10-year Treasury notes since 2000, as compiled by Ryan Labs, compares with a total-return version of the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index from 1990 through 2005. The latter gauge peaked in August 2000 and tumbled 38 percent in the next two years.

About $561 billion has flowed into bond funds since the beginning of last year, according to data from the Investment Company Institute. Stock funds, by contrast, had a $42 billion outflow during the period.”

>

Source:
U.S. Bonds Resemble Internet Bubble, Citi Says:
David Wilson
Bloomberg, 2010-08-17 13:02:46.389 GMT

Two Rocks

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - August 18th, 2010, 11:21AM

I love the long term perspective of this:

>

>

via boingboing

Felix Zulauf: Up Close And Personal (Transcript)

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - August 18th, 2010, 10:00AM

Earlier this month, I interviewed famed investor Felix Zulauf on his professional background and investment outlook (Audio here). As per popular request, here is the interview transcript.

————
BARRY RITHOLTZ: Tell us about your background…

FELIX ZULAUF: I grew up in Switzerland, in a small town, I went to all the school. After college, I decided to go [with] a banking career. I regretted it after a year or two because it was so boring — commercial banking, then I finally hit the investment department. It became more attractive. I asked my bosses why stock prices moved up and down, and from their end — I could very soon tell that they had no clue. So I tried to figure out if there were some other people who knew why the markets were moving. And I found some leading opinion people like Bob Farrell. They were all in the US, there were no opinion leaders in Europe. And I decided that I wanted to learn that business and foresee market moves in big ways.

And then I went step-by-step. I started in the equity stock market department in a Swiss Bank in Zurich. And then I transferred to Paris to a stockbroker for a year. There, I really developed my speculative activity. As a young chap, the owner of the shop gave me a credit of half a million dollars. Which was a dramatic amount for a 23-year-old guy, and I started speculating. Went short on the market in the fall of 1973 and you know what happened thereafter into the end of ’74. So that year I made the first big money.

What was your actual first employer?

The Swiss Bank Corp. I was there for 2 years. And then I was sent off to Paris and to acquainted more with the French language and see another country and another culture and I didn’t want to go to a bank because I wanted to learn more about the investment business. So I went there, came back after a year, moved then to portfolio management (or what they thought was portfolio management), and then went to the US. So in 1976, or 1977, I stayed in New York, put together a trainee program for myself using all of the concept of Swiss Bank Corp. and I trained with Charlie Maxwell in energy and Bob Farrell in Market Analysis and Ed Hyman in Economics and trading in a shop called Salomon Brothers at that time. So I went through Wall Street and all of those firms and it was like paradise.

I’m still friends with many of those people.

It was fantastic. And then the bank called me back to Switzerland in ’77. And then I changed horses and joined UBS because I wanted to learn money in a more aggressive way, and Swiss Bank didn’t offer me that job. That was ’77 — I joined UBS and the mutual funds management department and research. And I ran the US equity funds and global equity funds and a raw materials fund and became a global strategist for the whole UBS group. And later I ran the institutional portfolio management department at UBS and then came 1987. I was very instrumental to push UBS equity allocations to the highest in all of Europe. At that time, 65% equity in balanced accounts was extremely aggressive in European standards. And in ’87, during the summer, I tried to reduce that because I was also part of the investment committee, and I convinced the committee but general management then vetoed it and that upset me so much that I stopped there and liquidated all equities ahead of what thereafter became the crash of ’87.

And it didn’t make many friends. By hindsight, I think it was the most difficult thing I ever did because I never got the credit for it. I got the blame because all of my friends and colleagues looked terrible next to me. You know, from a political point of view, it was not a good move. But from a trustee point of view, it was the right move and also from a professional point of view, it was the right view.

Then I decided I needed to join a smaller money management operation where I had more freedom and I joined a subsidiary of Credit Suisse at that time as an executive vice president in charge of the whole investment policy. And then came ’89. The leading portfolio managers were very successful with Japanese equities and I turned very bearish on Japan and they took it as a personal insult that I turned very bearish on Japan.

At 39,000 and something, and I think it was January of 1990…I turned very bearish and pulled… And it then happened and it made it clear to me that I had to go on my own to manage money the way I thought was right.

Before you launched your firm, you had essentially rotated at some of the biggest banks in Europe and you had come to New York and worked at some of the biggest banks in the city. And the takeaway from all of this is that there are institutional impediments for a money manager and a trustee to operate on behalf of the clients.

So I became an entrepreneur and started a new financial management firm. I was 40 with two small kids and no client so the first six months were very tough because I could not attract any clients…which was very nerve-wracking. But after that, the ball got rolling and I managed individual accounts. i just wanted a limited number of individual accounts that I could manage in my own fashion so I could go long and short but not leverage. Which was basically the ways I ran my own money in earlier times. But later on, I moved away from leverage because too much leverage is where you make the most mistakes.

Read the rest of this entry »

“Periods When to Make Money” (© 1883)

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - August 18th, 2010, 9:00AM

Yesterday, we looked at Long Term Market Cycles dating back to 1927;

Today, lets have a look at periodicity dating back to 1763. The cycle the (unknown) author posis is a repeating 16/18/20 year

Across the top is the legend “Years in which panics have occurred and will occur again.” The past panic century of dates are 1911, 1927, 1945, 1965, 1981, 1999, 2019. Except for 1981, these were all pretty good years to sell (or short) stocks.

Fun stuff . . .

>

click for giant graphic

Hat tip Corey

Refi’s rock but expansion of activity not happening

Email this post Print this post
By Peter Boockvar - August 18th, 2010, 8:36AM

Historically low interest rates finally moved the needle for refinancings as the MBA said they rose 17.1% for the week to the highest since May ’09. Purchases however can’t get out of their own way as they fell 3.4% and are just 3.5% off the lowest level since 1997. This economic response to low rates is indicative of our whole economy that has the Fed now pushing on a string. In times of deleveraging, lower rates only encourage refi’s, not new economic activity whether the purchase of a home or the expansion of a business. ABC confidence rose 2 pts to -45 and is now 1 pt above its 1 yr avg. Portugal sold 3 mo and 12 mo bills and raised more than expected. Fitch did a stress test on the important European insurers and said they passed “based on the hypothetical scenario of a default on Greek government debt” and its “knock on effects on the sovereign debt of Portugal, Ireland, Spain and Italy.”

Bloomberg Radio

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - August 18th, 2010, 6:06AM

I am off to the Bloomberg Radio studios for an early segment with Keith McCullough of Hedge eye — he is substituting for the vacationing slacker Tom Keene.

I should be on from 8am to 9am . . .

>

You can stream Bloomberg Radio live by clicking below:

>

I expect this will be the end of my mad media run for a while; I have too much work to do!

Fixing the Housing Market

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - August 18th, 2010, 6:00AM

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

42 queries. 1.023 seconds.