Private sector job gains lackluster

Email this post Print this post
By Peter Boockvar - August 6th, 2010, 9:24AM

July private sector job gains totaled 71k, 19k below expectations and the 2 prior months were revised down by 97k. The headline drop of 131k was led by the decline in census workers. The unemployment rate was unchanged at 9.5% vs the estimates of 9.6% as the household survey drop of 159k about matched the 181k fall in the labor force. The all in rate (U6), was also unchanged at 16.5%. The average duration of unemployment ticked down to 34.2 from 35.2, a positive as was the increase in weekly hours worked to 34.2 from 34.1. Also positive, average hourly earnings rose .2% m/o/m, .1% above estimates. Manufacturing added 36k jobs, 23k above estimates. Construction and the financial sector again shed jobs. Temp employment fell by 6k, the 1st decline since Sept ’09. The B/D model added 6k vs -10k in ’09. Net-net, private sector job gains are averaging 90k per month this year, obvious hiring but still lackluster relative to what is needed to forcefully lower the unemployment rate.

Comments

Please use the comments to demonstrate your own ignorance, unfamiliarity with empirical data, ability to repeat discredited memes, and lack of respect for scientific knowledge. Also, be sure to create straw men and argue against things I have neither said nor even implied. Any irrelevancies you can mention will also be appreciated. Lastly, kindly forgo all civility in your discourse . . . you are, after all, anonymous.

3 Responses to “Private sector job gains lackluster”

  1. franklin411 Says:

    Why are you looking at all those metrics? I saw an “analyst” on tv who said that all we need to know about the unemployment report is whether “the job gain was 6 digits or 5!” Ha!

  2. deanscamaro Says:

    There is a conspiricy in the works to block out TBP, Barry. The Verizon ad now goes across the complete lines at the top of this post.

  3. moneymcbags Says:

    New song of the decade: “Brother, can you spare a dime, and maybe a 401k?”

    Even with the birth/death model being inconsequential this month, the numbers were not good.

    Money McBags has detailed analysis of the numbers:

    http://www.whengeniusprevailed.com

50 queries. 0.466 seconds.