NFP Chartfest

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - October 9th, 2010, 12:00PM

One of the more fascinating things about the monthly Employment report is the slew of charts it generates.

No one site or media outlet has a monopoly on interesting visual depictions of the employment situation. We have an embarrassment of riches, a virtual orgy of chart porn, and I could have included dozens more.

There are my top 10 favorites; as always, click to max out the image:

>

Unemployment by County


Washington Post

>

Comparing Post WW2 Recession Job Losses


Calculated Risk

>

BLS Employment Revisions


Economix

>

Changes in Temporary Employment


Bruce Steinberg.net

>

Jobless Recoveries: 1980 – Present


WSJ

>
Recession Recoveries: 1980 – Present

Economix

>

US Unemployment Rate


Bianco Research

>

Recession Comparisons (1954, 2001, 2009)


Chart of the Day

>

ADP vs BLS Employment Data


paper-money

>

Part Time for Economic Reasons


Calculated Risk

>

Did I miss anything particularly interesting? Let me know in comments . . .

Comments

Please use the comments to demonstrate your own ignorance, unfamiliarity with empirical data, ability to repeat discredited memes, and lack of respect for scientific knowledge. Also, be sure to create straw men and argue against things I have neither said nor even implied. Any irrelevancies you can mention will also be appreciated. Lastly, kindly forgo all civility in your discourse . . . you are, after all, anonymous.

14 Responses to “NFP Chartfest”

  1. Calvin Jones and the 13th Apostle Says:

    What all that tells me is that 8% U-3(at the least) is/will become the new normal. We’ve overcooked the goose big time.

  2. franklin411 Says:

    @Barry:
    You forgot a chart of how many charts you’ve used over time.

    @Calvin:
    The “new” normal is hardly new. We’ve been seeing the disastrous consequences of Reaganomics since 1990. We were fortunate to have a technological revolution from 1992-2000 that temporarily ameliorated the worst symptoms of the failure of Reaganomics. Then we had a “lost decade” in the 2000s where the GOP used credit as a narcotic to mask the fact that our economy relied upon an unsustainable pattern of consumption.

    The main difference between now and then is that we have a President in Barack Obama who has the courage to work to build a new foundation for the American economy based on manufacturing. No nation can ever be anything but a slave nation when it relies on consumption and easily-outsourced white-collar jobs for its prosperity.

  3. JustinTheSkeptic Says:

    How do you say who’s winning in Chinese? Or who’s tieing the score. So someday there will be a better world without capitalist pigs in it?

  4. soloduff Says:

    I have chart envy. Seriously, can anybody recommend a user-friendly math program–preferably free–that will compose graphs from formulae as well as the old-fashioned fill-in-the blank method?

    @ franklin411: I think you have Obama’s class allegiance all wrong. Rhetoric aside, he is as much a tool of big capital as was Reagan; just a differently nuanced tool. (There is a revolving-door plan in our “bipartisan” political regime to complement the revolving-door plan between business and government generically.) If I am correct, the only way that you’ll have your turn-the-clock-back (to a manufacturing America) wish come true is if big capital wants this–and I see no evidence of this. Rather, the Dems pursue the same old (ever-since-Reagan) corporate globalist agenda as the Repubs; a.k.a. the “race to the bottom,” a.k.a. the “Mexicanization of the USA.”

    ~~~

    BR: Excel or any of the free variants — Sun’s Open Office or the Google Doc spreadsheet.

  5. brianinla Says:

    You won’t see manufacturing come back to the US until gas is at $10/gallon – when it becomes cheaper to make it here than transport it from halfway around the world. Franklin needs to get out more – too much cheap idle labor worldwide to compete against in a shrinking manufacturing sector (due to automation). And doesn’t Franklin teach? His job can easily be outsourced to an internet classroom. I can’t tell that he’s produced anything except political barbs. Yeah that’ll pay the rent.

  6. Ilya Says:

    Why does everyone hate farmers? It’s always the non FARM payroll. When will we get farm payrolls? Chicken gotta get fed and someone needs to cut the rhubarb!

    The first chart was somewhat telling. The low unemloyment swath on the map is the food belt.

  7. econimonium Says:

    Well brianinla, gas doesn’t really need to be $10 a gallon. What are most commodities priced in? What is oil priced in? What is happening to the dollar now? If the Chinese won’t allow the yuan to rise, having the dollar drop is the next best thing isn’t it? Because once commodities go through the roof, and oil rises a bit, and the dollar is incredibly weak, we have yuan adjustment by circumstance.

    Of course someone out there could grow a pair and just label them currency manipulators and slap a tariff on everything. Or people in this country could all stop buying cheap Chinese crap at Walmart (oh that makes me laugh!). And if they stop buying Treasuries? Well, frankly, I agree with those that say go ahead. It would be the best thing that they could do for us.

    I honestly think the endgame of this isn’t going to be very pretty, and as someone who has actually had dealings with, and been to, China, I honestly don’t think they will be the powerhouse most people think. The costs aren’t that cheap anymore, and if this current economic downturn lasts even a couple of more years they’ll be the Japan of the new millennium. And maybe that’s what the business agenda is, you know? Remember all that talk of Japan? Poof, lost decade. If that happens to China, it will be a lost century.

  8. NoKidding Says:

    High gas prices would have virtually no effect on imports from China. The per-item trans-Pacific shipping cost for fuel of small items like a pair of sneakers in a container ship is thousandths of a penny. Almost the entire cost is capital cost. Relatively zero ships from Asia to the US by air.

  9. brianinla Says:

    China? There’s a lot more places to go downstream than manufacturing in China. Tens of millions of people in the rest of Asia and Africa that will work for dollars a day – in towns where 80% of the population live without running water to their houses. All that’s needed is a stable electrical grid and a way to get the goods to the docks. Devaluing the dollar against the yuan won’t bring manufacturing back here.

  10. S Brennan Says:

    Franklin,

    Barack stated that Reagan was his political hero, the “stimulus” was 40% tax cut. In fact, Obama is far to the right of Reagan on economic, social and foreign policy, take the political blinders off.

    “The main difference between now and then is that we have a President in Barack Obama”

  11. Long term Says:

    So much great data…thanks for the compilation, BR! I really like the WSJ graph that breaks out the Private/Govt/Manufacturing sector contributions to job growth after recession endpoints. The trend is clear. In recessions prior to 1991, the Private sector carried huge weight in adding jobs. In recessions since, the Private sector carries negative weight. I see two options: 1) go sideways for a long time 2) create lots of government jobs. There are pros and cons to each. I think American salaries will need to shrink somewhat whether jobs come via Private or Govt.

    @ Ilya – good one…LOL

  12. Sunday links: activist action Abnormal Returns Says:

    [...] A scad of charts on non-farm payrolls. (Big Picture) [...]

  13. mathman Says:

    Look at all the new jobs and growth industry going on:

    http://cryptogon.com/?p=18152#comments

  14. Bad news and (not so) good news on jobs « Phil Ebersole's Blog Says:

    [...] on Calculated Risk and NFB Chartfest for more charts on unemployment and the [...]

66 queries. 0.356 seconds.