Peak Earnings Versus Stock Peaks

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - October 18th, 2010, 1:00PM

Goldman Sach’s David Kostin created this chart comparing earnings peaks with market action.

In addition to showing how overpriced the market was in 1999/2000, it suggests an SPX peak relative to current ( estimate of a near term peak) his earnings:

>

click for bigger chart

Goldman Sachs chart via ZeroHedge

Comments

Please use the comments to demonstrate your own ignorance, unfamiliarity with empirical data, ability to repeat discredited memes, and lack of respect for scientific knowledge. Also, be sure to create straw men and argue against things I have neither said nor even implied. Any irrelevancies you can mention will also be appreciated. Lastly, kindly forgo all civility in your discourse . . . you are, after all, anonymous.

7 Responses to “Peak Earnings Versus Stock Peaks”

  1. Monday links: shoddy IPOs Abnormal Returns Says:

    [...] Market valuations provide room for an upside surprise.  (ValuePlays also Big Picture) [...]

  2. jhunt Says:

    it’d be interesting see this chart overlaid with a chart of other secular bear markets.

    if the beginning of a secular bull is marked by an obviously (in hindsight, BLINDINGLY obvious) cheap market (based on p/e or p/b or whatever), do we see a market where stock prices never get to their previous highs, and then crash anyway, all while earnings stay close to highs?

    hmmmm…

  3. Mark E Hoffer Says:

    “…”Exactly what kind of meat is this, sir?”

    “It’s just meat; it’s good” he assures you, nodding and grinning.

    That’s about as much clarity you’ll get on bank books these days.

    Changes to accounting rules have made balance sheets in the sector a farce. Like the change that allows banks to value holdings at what they say they’re worth, rather than what somebody would actually pay for it.

    It’s known as mark-to-imagination accounting. That’s opposed to mark-to-market accounting, in which securities are valued based on what people will actually pay for them.

    These accounting changes were supposed to be temporary, but like Milton Friedman said, “Nothing is so permanent as a temporary government program.”

    So the game is extend and pretend.

    It can’t last forever, of course, which is why I’m steering clear of bank stocks…”
    http://www.wealthdaily.com/articles/avoid-financial-stocks-buy-tech-commodities/2778

    yea, is it, only, ‘Bank Stocks’ ?

  4. Daily Links: How Countrywide Covered the Cracks | The Dynamic Dividend Says:

    [...] Peak Earnings Versus Stock Peaks “Goldman Sach’s David Kostin created this chart comparing earnings peaks with market action.”  [The Big Picture] [...]

  5. Gatsby Says:

    I would LOVE to hear Golman explain how we are going to get to $90 EPS.

  6. MikeW Says:

    Earnings growing this strongly with Main Street in such bad shape makes me wonder how overseas sales figure in this.

  7. RiskAverseAlert Says:

    I think it a mistake to look at this EPS v. SPX comparison in isolation from dynamics involved in the evolution of a credit bubble’s inflation and popping, particularly now that a non-trivial matter of systemic fraud has entered into the picture.

54 queries. 0.359 seconds.