New Home Sales awful but I say good, again

Email this post Print this post
By Peter Boockvar - March 23rd, 2011, 10:32AM

Feb New Home sales, a measure of contract signings of new homes, totaled 250k, the lowest on record dating back to 1963 and 40k below expectations. Sales in all 4 regions fell. To put into perspective, US population size in 1963 was 190mm vs 310mm today. In Jan 1963, new home sales totaled 591k. With the sales drop and stable level of homes for sale (186k), the months supply rose to 8.9 from 7.4, the most since Aug. The median price fell 8.9% y/o/y and 13.9% sequentially. Builders continue to face large competition from still too many existing homes on the market, and while they continue to suffer thru a very difficult time, I repeat my comment from last week when Housing Starts were poor that the bright side of this low level of new home sales is that hopefully it allows the market to further purge itself of the inventory of existing homes as we don’t need more new homes right now.

Bracketology: Sweet Sixteen of Corporate Bankruptcy

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - March 23rd, 2011, 10:04AM

Warning: Legal wonkery ahead:

Powerhouse law firm Weill Gotshal published a “Sweet 16″ of most influential, transformative, or game-changing U.S. bankruptcy decisions. At their bankruptcy blog (really), you can choose your favorite bankruptcy case — they and Weill will eventually crown a March bankruptcy madness winner:

>

>

Hat tip Dealbook

Is the Market Topping Out?

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - March 23rd, 2011, 9:00AM


Clock ticking on Portugal

Email this post Print this post
By Peter Boockvar - March 23rd, 2011, 7:34AM

We will likely know soon after 11am whether Portugal will be next to receive EU/IMF bailout money as at that time the Portuguese government will vote on adding more budget cuts to what currently exist. The opposition wants to vote no and if the budget deal fails, the Socrates government will fall and hat in hand the country will go to the EU/IMF. Investors aren’t waiting around as their 2 yr yield is jumping 12 bps to the highest since ’96. Irish yields are spiking as their 2 yr yield is up by 74 bps to above 10% as we await the stress test results on their banks on Mar 31st. Notwithstanding this and the Japanese disaster, the ECB still is intent on raising interest rates in two weeks and 3 month Euribor is rising to the highest since June ’09. Japan’s government expects the damage to total between $200-300b. The Nikkei closed lower by 1.7% after Tokyo said don’t have infants drink tap water (certainly alarming to hear) and smoke rose from reactor 3.

Should You Buy a Home? Looking (Again) at Housing

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - March 23rd, 2011, 7:10AM

I posted a video of my pal James Altucher on Yahoo Tech Ticker this week, declaring he was “Never going to buy a home ever again!”

Whenever I hear that sort of declaration, it tells me we are closer to the end of down cycle than the beginning. The psychology is reaching a negative extreme, and that means we are nearer to a capitulation.

Lets take a closer look at Jame’s thesis: I do not agree with much of what he states here — from buying the home builders (why?) to being a renter (maybe) to not owning a home (huh?) to homes being illiquid (exaggerated). And while there are many reasons to buy a house, as an investment is not really one of them.

Indeed, I find myself noting the following in response to Jim’s concerns:

• Home ownership allows you to live in one place for as long as you like, without worries that the property owner will not renew your lease.

• You get to select the school district you like for your kids’ education.

• Those of us who lived in a city know what its like to be subject to the capricious whims of a landlord. (no fun).

• When you own your home, you have the option of painting the walls whatever color you want, doing capital improvements, renovations, etc.

• Homes are less liquid than stocks, but price any home correctly and it will sell quickly.

• If you buy a home you can actually afford, there is no more stress about mortgage payments than paying your rent.

• For middle class Americans, the mortgage deduction is a huge tax savings.

There are lots of reasons to choose between Owning and Renting — it is a personal life choice — but since you have to live somewhere, its simple math to determine what the price differences are. Are the marginal cost differences worth the perceived advantages? That is your calculus.

Currently, our 3 metrics for measuring home prices show prices remain elevated by various degrees.

1. Median Income to Median Home Price — it is still about 10% too high nationally. This is the most reliable of our indicators, and it shows the most expensive home prices of the three.

2. Cost of Renting vs Cost of Ownership: This metric is now reasonable — rents have gone up, people are fearful of buying an asset whose price is falling — so it makes Ownership look more attractive, depending upon the region. But it is the most volatile and least reliable of the three, as it is easily influenced by risk aversion psychology and rising rent prices.

3. Housing Value as a % of GDP:  It shows only a slightly over-valued housing market, but that is due to the weak economy. A more robust GDP makes housing look pricier.

Nationally, home prices remain somewhat elevated, but not absurdly so. The local region you are in, and the specific price you negotiate determine if you paid fair value or worse. Given the many variables, there are no broad declarations to be made that reflect every sale of every house. The answer to our title question (“Should You Buy a Home?”) is it really depends.

My biggest issue when it comes to Home prices is the lack of pendulum swing. All over-priced markets that crash typically swing to the downside until they not only achieve fair value but become cheap. Unfortunately, that has not been allowed to happen in the residential real estate market. The government’s HAMP/Mortgage Mods, the foreclosure abatement plans, the new purchaser tax credit, and even the Fed’s ZIRP have all conspired to prevent market forces from repricing homes.

If we want home prices to bottom, well then we must let them fall.

Look Who Is Blogging: The New York Fed

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - March 23rd, 2011, 6:00AM

This morning, we welcome to the blogosphere the NY Fed, who just launched Liberty Street Economics (the NY Fed’s street address is 33 Liberty Street):

>

Free ‘Angry Birds’ app at Amazon App Store

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - March 22nd, 2011, 9:32PM

If you have an Android device, then you must grab this addictive game (free) from Amazon’s new App store/litigation factory:

>

How to Protect Yourself (Generally)

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - March 22nd, 2011, 9:23PM

On Twitter, Pete Rozin asks: “If we are topping, give us a strategy to protect our longs!!!”

Well, that is the strategy you should have in place already. Regardless of what markets are doing, you need an exit plan before things get dicey. The strategy should not depend upon any twist or turn in the markets.

Pete, let me suggest these readings to get you started:

Protect Your Backside Limiting losses in ‘disaster’ stocks is a crucial element of money management.

The Stop-Loss Breakdown We review several other stop-loss strategies you can use to prevent losses from getting out of hand.

The Stock Pre-Nup Before getting emotional and the dishes start flying, consider a pre-nuptial agreement for stocks.

See if there are any things in those that are of help . . .

Louise Yamada on Dollar, Trade Opportunity

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - March 22nd, 2011, 7:48PM

A weak dollar could provide investors with an opportunity to cash in. Louise Yamada, Managing Director, Louise Yamada Technical Research Advisors, LLC lays out a strategy.


Airtime: Tues. Mar. 22 2011 | 4:40 PM ET

Media Appearance: CNBC Fast Money (3.22.11)

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - March 22nd, 2011, 4:30PM

>

Special Market Topping Edition!

Tonight I will be on Fast Money on CNBC at 5:30 pm discussing the overall quality of the market rally, following the selloff and snapback post Japan:

• Markets tend to wobble when hit with these externalities, then resume their prior action.

• Stocks seemed to be starting a topping formation — a 3-9 month process — prior to the crack.

• The complacency about Japan (Barron’s cover, Economist, everyone on TV) is somewhat concerning

• Watch the S&P500 1310-1315 level — that could be key resistance where this rally fails

• Sectors that look especially ugly are retail and consumer discretionary.

~~~

Video posted here

41 queries. 1.087 seconds.