Shiller versus Siegel Debate: Are Stocks Overvalued?

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - April 27th, 2011, 12:30PM

Shiller and Siegel debate stock valuations: Yale economist Robert Shiller and Wharton’s Jeremy Siegel square off over the best method for calculating market value — and offer conflicting assessments

Comments

Please use the comments to demonstrate your own ignorance, unfamiliarity with empirical data, ability to repeat discredited memes, and lack of respect for scientific knowledge. Also, be sure to create straw men and argue against things I have neither said nor even implied. Any irrelevancies you can mention will also be appreciated. Lastly, kindly forgo all civility in your discourse . . . you are, after all, anonymous.

4 Responses to “Shiller versus Siegel Debate: Are Stocks Overvalued?”

  1. KJ Foehr Says:

    Never trust a sell-side analyst.

    Guess which one that is.

  2. the bankster Says:

    Why don’t interviewers ever start off like this: “Professor Shiller you called the housing bubble perfectly. And Professor Siegel you cluelessly said bank stocks were cheap to book in the summer of 2008. Not such a good call.” Isn’t the track record of the guests ever relevant?

  3. ben22 Says:

    how hilarious, two smart guys that are always two steps removed from their stock market forecast as they have to predict their indicators

  4. cthwaites Says:

    Siegel was a gun for hire for every mutual fund company out there in the 90s. And isn’t he part of Wisdom Tree?

56 queries. 0.316 seconds.