A Losing Bet: The End of the World

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - May 23rd, 2011, 9:00AM

If you are reading this, it means that the end of the world, previously scheduled for 1994 Saturday night, did not occur.

Why anyone pays attention to these dang fools is one of the more annoying vestiges of the 2007-09 recession and market collapse. The rise of the cranks is a classic example of the Recency effect, an after the fact, 20/20 hindsight, rear view look at the world.

Not just the eejit End-of-Worlders who have been with us since the beginning of time. There have also been a slew of broken watch pundits who have enjoyed an undeserved credibility following the crisis.

Who are these Doom & Gloomers? They include:

• Crisis rock stars;

• Goldbrickers who missed the equity rally;

• Thinly veiled partisans;

• Hyper-inflationistas;

• Conspiracy theorists!

• Austerians;

• Analysts trying to turn one good call into a new business model;

• One sided web sites that never see anything positive;

• Specialists in Recession Porn;

I don’t have to name names — you can do that if you want. I am compelled to point out that this crowd not only is enjoying undeserved credibility, they are NOT making their followers money. Listening to their advice, their readership missed the greatest market rally in 4 generations, but they piled into commodities in time for a major collapse, got frightened out of munis that have no credit issue or default threat, and have otherwise missed opportunities and lost capital.

I have never been a perma-bull — not only because its money-losing to be one-sided, but also because throughout most of my career, equities have been over-priced.

The bottom line is simple this: You best understand the motivations, track record, and credibility of the people you choose to read before you allocate any capital based upon it.

The Lost Beatles Photographs: Bob Bonis Archive 1964-66

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - May 23rd, 2011, 8:00AM

Via Brain Pickings, comes this lost archive of Beatles Photos

By now, the story of The Beatles has been told to death: Early 1960s, four lads from Liverpool invade America, ignite a cultural revolution, fame and fortune, blah blah blah.

Bob Bonis was the tour manager for the bands three U.S. tours, 1964, 1965, and 1966. Bonis was a passionate amateur photographer with a keen eye, an innate sense of composition, and a deep love for his subjects. He snapped over 900 photographs of the band—a remarkable collection that until now has only been known to family and close friends.

45 years later, these photos have bene released to the public. The Lost Beatles Photographs form a groundbreaking portrait of the most iconic band of the twentieth century at a pivotal time in their career, conquering America.

What makes Bonis’s photos so worthwhile is the unprecedented, behind-the-scenes access to The Beatles during their breakthrough moments on the world stage. From rehearsing backstage to stellar performances in concert, to the casual moments. In rehearsal, in concert, in dressing rooms, on vacation, at press events, and on the road.

~~~
1964: The Beatles at Seattle-Tacoma airport, heading to Vancouver for their first Canadian concert

The Beatles in Los Angeles

Bloomington’s Metropolitan Stadium on August 12, 1965

John Lennon in Portland, Oregon, on August 22, 1965

The Beatles begin their last tour, Detroit, August 13, 1966

Detroit on August 13, 1966

Philadelphia’s JFK Stadium on August 16, 1966

A toy gun (a gift from Elvis Presley) in Los Angeles 1964 U.S. tour

Busch Memorial Stadium in St. Louis, August 21, 1966

Look Out Below; Euro Crisis Version

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - May 23rd, 2011, 6:38AM


>

Good Monday morning, we start the week with stocks under pressure in Europe. Stocks fell the most in a month, as the euro weakened (record low vs Swissie) as Europe’s sovereign debt crisis worsens.

By the numbers:

-Stoxx Europe 600 Index down 1.4% (off the lows of down > 2%
-Asian markets see broad based weakness
-MSCI All-Country World Index sank 1.2%
-Shanghai Composite Index dropped 2.9%
-Standard & Poor’s 500 Index futures fell 0.9 percent.
-Italy’s FTSE MIB Index slid 3%
-Spain’s 10-year bond yield jumped 10 basis points.
-Euro weakened to less than $1.40 for the first time since March 18.
-Oil and copper led commodities lower.

Over the weekend, Ron Griess of The Chart Store mapped out 5 major questions facing the market. His number 3 question: “How will the Eurozone problems be resolved?” We don’t yet have an answer, but it is in large part what is roiling markets this morning.

>

Sell in May, or Climbing a Wall of Worry?

click for larger chart

Thank You, Joe Mysak

Email this post Print this post
By David Kotok - May 23rd, 2011, 6:00AM

Thank You, Joe Mysak
May 22, 2011
David R. Kotok
www.cumber.com

~~~

First we must thank Tom Keene and Ken Prewitt for the kind invitation to talk about Muniland on Bloomberg radio at 7 am, this coming Thursday, May 26, 2011.  The invitation came after our recent piece discussing the ongoing Muni media saga and Meredith Whitney.  Readers know that Ms. Whitney and I are in deep disagreement over her forecast of massive defaults in Muniland.

When it comes to Muniland, Bloomberg’s Joe Mysak is the journalist laureate in that space.  Joe wrote “Whitney Denies, Defends Default Predictions” on May 20.   His column says it all.   We will leave it to the readers who have emailed us during the last half year to resolve their own views of Ms. Whitney, her media interviews and her Muni default rate forecasting.

Joe Mysak’s column follows in its complete and original form.   We thank Joe for permission to share it with our readers.

+——————————————————————————+

Meredith Whitney Trips Over Her Muni Default Tale: Joe Mysak

2011-05-19 23:30:00.0 GMT

Commentary by Joe Mysak

May 20 (Bloomberg) — It’s no wonder Meredith Whitney wants to distance herself from her prediction of the municipal market’s meltdown.

“I never said that there would be hundreds of billions of defaults. It was never a precise estimate over a specific period of time.” So said Whitney on Bloomberg Radio on Wednesday morning.

This is what she said on an episode of CBS’s “60 Minutes”

that aired on Dec. 19, 2010:

“You could see 50 sizeable defaults. Fifty to 100 sizeable defaults. More. This will amount to hundreds of billions of dollars’ worth of defaults.”

As for timing, “It’ll be something to worry about within the next 12 months.”

What this sounds like is Meredith Whitney saying there will be hundreds of billions of dollars’ worth of municipal bond defaults within the next 12 months. That sounds like a precise estimate over a specific period of time. And that’s how it has been reported and dissected in the press since then, with not a word of protest from Whitney.

Until this week. Whitney told Bloomberg Radio host Tom Keene that she thought “60 Minutes” did a “really good job” on the story. “But the risk is that they take bits and pieces of an hour-and-a-half interview and certain portions are more magnified than others.”

Whitney also later told Keene: “In the cycle of this municipal downturn, I stand by it. But we never had a specific estimate for that. That’s not the nature of our research.”

See It Yourself

So now we have Whitney standing by something she said she never said, and unfortunately — for her — recorded for posterity. You can watch the video for yourself on the CBS website. I saw the original segment when it was broadcast and have watched it several dozen times since then, just to make sure I heard what I thought I heard: that there would be hundreds of billions of dollars’ worth of municipal bond defaults this year.

I guess the call is still for hundreds of billions of dollars’ worth of municipal bond defaults, but now over the duration of “this municipal downturn,” whatever that means. So far this year, 14 municipal bond issues totaling $605 million have defaulted, according to Richard Lehmann of the Distressed Debt Securities Newsletter. The record year for defaults was 2008, when $8.5 billion in municipals went bust.

What so astonished municipal market investors about the Whitney call was its outlandishness — “hundreds of billions” in a market that hasn’t seen a year in which defaults reached even $10 billion. Nobody denied that states and municipalities were in heavy weather, on many fronts, and that some issuers might default. Still, Whitney’s outlook, then and now, sounds absurd.

Essence of Whitneyism

Whitney shed some light on the “60 Minutes” call earlier this month at the Milken Institute Global Conference. The states, she said, were cutting aid to localities. “The local municipalities have nowhere to go and their bias is to save their constituents before they save their bondholders,” she said.

This, then, was the underpinning of the Whitney prognostication, which acted as a sort of punctuation mark to almost two years of hysterical headlines, misguided commentary and know-nothing blog posts about the municipal market. The numbers didn’t add up because her prediction really wasn’t about the numbers. It was about mass repudiation of municipal debt obligations.

As arguments go, there’s a certain logic to it. Make a few bondholders suffer, and some people may think you’re a hero.  Raise taxes, and lose the next election.

And yet, as arguments go, Whitneyism is an unsupported assertion. In the modern era, there is little to suggest that serious public officials will shirk their duty to bondholders.

The results would be catastrophic, far worse than any temporary boon to taxpayers. Past performance is no guarantee of future behavior, but there has been nothing to signal that mass repudiation will become fashionable at any time, let alone within the next eight months.

(Joe Mysak is editor of Bloomberg Brief’s daily Municipal Market. The opinions expressed are his own.)

At Cumberland, we agree with Joe Mysak.  The results of any local Muni debt repudiation would be catastrophic for that local government unit.  Vallejo CA is learning that the hard way after it sought to use municipal bankruptcy in lieu of responsible government.

Cumberland continues to buy individually selected and researched Munis for the separately managed account clients of our firm.  We believe the media saga of the last six months has provided some terrific opportunities in Muniland.  Now that Munis are rallying we are watching them convert into profitable holdings.

And let me add this for those who do not know us and asked about our affiliations.  We are an independent boutique. We do not have a common fund.  We do not have a mutual fund.  We are not a hedge fund.  We are not an underwriter.  We are not brokers.  We do not get paid from brokerage commissions on any Muni transactions.

We are a fee-for-service independent adviser.  We are fee-based only.

~~~
David R. Kotok, Chairman and Chief Investment Officer

Puru Saxena on Why QE3 is Inevitable

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - May 23rd, 2011, 5:00AM

Puru Saxena of Puru Saxena Wealth Management explains to CNBC Asia why QE3 is all but a done deal and what effects it will have when it comes…

FDIC Bank Closings

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - May 22nd, 2011, 6:00PM

The FDIC have been busy again, and so its time for 2 of our favorite charts, via Ron Griess of The Chart Store.
>

click for larger charts

Dominique Strauss-Kahn SNL Opening

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - May 22nd, 2011, 5:01PM

Show Clips from SNL

The embattled former IMF head is confronted right away by some opinionated inmates upon landing in his Rikers Island cell

Obsessed with InfoGraphics!

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - May 22nd, 2011, 3:00PM

Skype
http://cdn.venturebeat.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/Skype.png

Several more after the jump

Read the rest of this entry »

The Many Hats of Great Investors

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - May 22nd, 2011, 10:12AM


>
I have a new column out in the Washington Post on what varied skills it takes to become a better investor, titled The many hats of great investors.

Here is an excerpt:

“Contrary to popular belief, investing isn’t a traditional academic discipline. Money management is hardly a typical major. There are, of course, plenty of “Business Administration” undergrads, but their focus tends to be on running companies, rather than investing in them.

We churn out MBAs like made-in-China widgets, yet few ever become outstanding investors. And don’t even ask about economists — the profession that missed the housing boom and bust, the Great Recession, the credit crisis and the market collapse.

Great investors are savvy generalists. I can think of five fields that are hugely helpful to asset management. If you were to study these disciplines, your understanding of how markets work would greatly improve. And you would be a better investor.

How? You will generate better risk-adjusted returns; meaning, you will get the most bang for the bucks you are putting at risk. You will suffer less from volatility — the stomach-churning ups and downs in the markets that are one part risk, one part opportunity. And you will avoid the typical mistakes that most investors make.”

To see the five disciplines I discuss that can help you be a better investor, read at the full column at the Washington Post . . .

>

Source:
The many hats of great investors
Barry Ritholtz
Washington Post, May 22, 2011, Page G6
http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/on-investing-the-many-hats-of-great-investors/2011/05/17/AFN02c8G_story.html

Taibbi: ‘U.S. politics – reality show sponsored by Wall Street’

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - May 22nd, 2011, 8:34AM

42 queries. 1.069 seconds.