Greek ‘To Do’ list still left unchecked

Email this post Print this post
By Peter Boockvar - June 20th, 2011, 7:29AM

The ‘To Do’ list for Greece, the EU and the IMF is still left unchecked after the weekend meetings. Step 1, confidence vote in the Greek government will be tomorrow which will then be followed by a parliamentary vote on the deficit cutting plan that meets the current EU/IMF criteria demands in order for them to release the next 12b euro tranche to Greece. If Step 1 complete, Step 2 will be finalization of a new bailout package that will include a voluntary debt rollover with the enticements for existing bondholders still to be determined. Step 2 seems to be a question of doting I’s and crossing T’s after Merkel and Sarkozy broke bread on Friday but we can’t get there until the Greeks themselves stick to their end of the initial bailout bargain in Step 1. While this soap opera continues, the underlying weakness of the global equity markets over the past month has been due to economic moderation and those fears continue in the two fastest avenues of growth, China and India. The Shanghai index fell to the lowest since late Sept and the Sensex dropped to the lowest since Feb.

The Missed Opportunity to Reform Reckless Banking

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - June 20th, 2011, 7:15AM

“Excessive regulation in the banking reform bill will destroy a substantial part of our bond-distributing machinery. Can anyone expect that a step of this kind will improve the quality of our long-term investments?”

-President of the American Bankers Association

>

In case you missed it, Joe Nocera had an outstanding column in Saturday’s NYT. It began with that quote above, circa January 1933. Yes, the banking industry has been railing about regulation for nearly a century. What they really want is to have it both ways — as little regulation as possible, but Taxpayer Bailouts there when they periodically blow themselves up.

But the heart of Nocera’s column discusses how unique the Glass Steagall act was, changing the banking environment form one of speculation (and massive depositor losses) to a boring, modestly profitable, cornerstone of the national economy.

What made it possible was the focused public ire on bankers, mostly due to the Pecora Commisssion.

“There was surprisingly little controversy over what we now think of as [Glass Steagall] law’s primary achievement: splitting commercial and investment banking. The fights were all over issues that seem inconsequential by today’s lights. It’s as if the notion of breaking the banking business into two was always a foregone conclusion.

And, for the most part, it was. Partly, this was because, unlike today, bank failures in the 1930s were often ruinous to customers. So reform was more pressing. But it was also because, for the entire time the legislation was under consideration, the Pecora hearings were going on — in which Ferdinand Pecora, the flamboyant chief counsel of the Senate Banking Committee, dragged one well-known banker after another before the committee and grilled them mercilessly, exposing how they had abused their investment banking roles, sometimes to the point of criminality. The Pecora hearings serve as a steady drumbeat in the American Banker articles.

Those hearings infuriated the country, and made it unthinkable that banks would continue to be allowed to sell securities. In fact, some banks, seeing which way the wind was blowing, applauded: “The spirit of speculation should be eradicated from the management of commercial banks,” declared Winthrop Aldrich, the chairman of Chase National Bank, according to Michael Perino, Pecora’s biographer. Ironically, Glass loathed the Pecora hearings, deriding them as “a circus, and the only thing lacking now are peanuts and colored lemonade.” But the hearings made his bill — which had been filibustered by Huey Long just 18 months earlier — not just possible but inevitable.”

Fascinating stuff.

But it points out an enormous series of errors from newly elected President Obama — from appointing the status quo duo (Geithner and Summers) to letting the guilty parties off the hook. He should have been hammering away at the miscreants who caused the crisis, instead of continuing George W. Bush’s socialist bailouts of the banks.

Just a few results of his team’s inability to confront the causal forces?

1. A generational opportunity to restore accountability and prudence to banking

2. The trashing of zombie bad ideas that refuse to die

3. The misdirected fury of the Tea Party.

The missed opportunity to restore Glass Steagall, repeal the CFMA, and create a more honest framework for Wall Street and Banking will always be for me, the greatest tragedy of the Obama administration.

>

Source:
The Banking Miracle
JOE NOCERA
NYT, June 17, 2011
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/18/opinion/18nocera.html

The True History of the Traveling Wilburys

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - June 20th, 2011, 6:24AM

Pretty awesome:

>
click for video

>

Note: This is scheduled to disappear soon!  Better watch it while you can . . .

Jon Stewart on ‘Fox News Sunday’

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - June 19th, 2011, 9:41PM

‘Daily Show’ host talks politics, media bias in extended, unedited interview

FDIC Bank Closings

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - June 19th, 2011, 8:45PM

Via Ron Griess of The Chart Store, here is the latest update regarding FDIC bank closures:

>

click for larger charts

~~~

US Foreclosures: Kicking the Can Down the Road…

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - June 19th, 2011, 11:00AM

click for ginormous graphic

>

Today’s WTF data point is how long it will take to work through the backlog of foreclosures at the current pace:

“In New York State, it would take lenders 62 years at their current pace, the longest time frame in the nation, to repossess the 213,000 houses now in severe default or foreclosure, according to calculations by LPS Applied Analytics, a prominent real estate data firm.

Clearing the pipeline in New Jersey, which like New York handles foreclosures through the courts, would take 49 years. In Florida, Massachusetts and Illinois, it would take a decade.

>

Source:
Backlog of Cases Gives a Reprieve on Foreclosures
DAVID STREITFELD
NYT, June 19, 2011
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/19/business/19foreclosure.html

Trichet/Sarkozy 1 Merkel 0

Email this post Print this post
By Guest Author - June 19th, 2011, 9:14AM
Kiron Sarkar lives in London and Ireland where he works as a money manager. He occasionally attends the Scarsdales Equity idea lunches when he comes to New York, which is where I met him.



What a week. At the end of the previous week, the Germans signalled that they would take a tough stance on Greece, only for Mrs Merkel to completely cave in this week. Trichet and Sarkozy must have the biggest smiles on their faces – for how long though – never underestimate the Germans.

The Greek PM, reshuffled his cabinet, appointing a political opponent as Finance Minister. A confidence vote is to be called. This coming week, the Euro Zone Finance ministers meet – presumably they will agree (with the IMF) to transferring the next trance (E12 bn) of aid to Greece, which will need approval by the Euro Zone Heads of State, at a follow up meeting. This and any subsequent transfers of money are going to be a complete waste of money, though in the circumstances is the right thing to do, as the Euro Zone does not have a plan to deal with the consequences of a Greek default and, in particular, the contagion effects that will follow – essentially a number of European banks will be bust.

This is not yet a done deal. The biggest threats. Well, the Euro Zone Finance Minsters/Euro Zone Heads of State may not agree on a bail out package (unlikely), the German Parliament could vote against (a more serious issue, but on balance, also unlikely), the Greeks could reject the additional austerity measures (unlikely, as they need the money to pay their bills), the Greek Parliament could vote against the PM (less certain, but, following the cabinet reshuffle,unlikely) and the German Constitutional Court could well consider the further tranche of aid illegal, as its a fiscal transfer, which is specifically prohibited by the Euro Zone treaties (a real threat) and/or certain countries (such as Finland) may not approve a further aid package to Greece (all Euro Zone countries have to approve the additional aid package).

The biggest issue remains – the lack of capital of a number of European banks, which as we all know, is really the reason for all of this nonsense. Since the 2008 crisis, the Europeans have singularly failed to address this issue. Indeed, the Germans and the French have resisted moves to increase core Tier 1 capital ratios (last week, a number of the major French banks were downgraded). They will be paying far more attention to it now, as unless achieved, this very sorry state of affairs will continue.

What next. Well, the Europeans have to address the real issue ie the under capitalised banks. Basically, Governments have to provide the funds and/or act as a backstop, if the market cannot (as is likely) – not that easy to do at present, as their financial positions of a number of Euro Zone countries are stretched, but they will have to.

There is also the issue of bank bail outs being politically difficult.

The European  Bank Stress Tests, due out in July, will be a complete waste of time, as they do not address the issue of haircuts (which are clearly necessary) on Sovereign bonds held by European banks on their banking books. The market will not be fooled this time – indeed, I was totally amazed it was, last time around.

There is a “sell by date” involved in all of this – in my opinion no later than the end of this year, but certainly not 2013, as the Euro Zone believes. The current situation is unsustainable.

No matter what measures the Greeks promise to abide by, they will not deliver, though from now on it gets tougher, as they will have the EU/ECB/IMF in Athens, verifying the numbers – the most recent data clearly shows that Greece has (once again) failed to deliver. The rest of Europe could not care a damn about Greece, I assure you. Indeed, my suggestion of handing over the country to the Turks is, quite frankly, the mildest suggestion around.

As a result, this crisis will pop up again. Moody’s, followed S&P, by placing Italy on review for a possible downgrade. Given the political situation in Italy (Berlusconi is coming under additional pressure – he lost a referendum recently – but there are few, if any, others who can take over as PM), the country is likely to be downgraded. Ireland is threatening to extend haircuts on senior bank bondholders – inevitable, in my view. Portugal cannot survive with its present debt load, given its anemic growth, but the population is not as vocal as the Greeks and the new Government will be given some time.

The biggest threat remains Spain. As you know, I believe that stories of “black holes” in provincial debt will emerge in coming weeks, following the recent elections, which resulted in a change in administration in most of the regions/municipalities. Spanish banks have not made adequate provisions and will come under pressure.

With a common currency and the freedom to move your money around, why would depositors not withdraw their funds from the banks of the peripheral countries and move them to “safer” banks in core Euro Zone counties. Off course they will. How do the banks in these peripheral countries survive – well they have to borrow more from the ECB, who are trying to stop reduce emergency short term financing to “addicted banks”. As a result, the ECB just takes on more and more risk and which, inevitably, will result ion greater and greater losses. Indeed, I would argue that the ECB is bust, if their assets and collateral is marked to market.

I simply cannot believe that this situation can last much longer.

One solution could be for the EFSF to buy peripheral country bonds at a massive discount (in Greece’s case 70%+) and, in effect, allow the peripheral Euro Zone countries to reduce their overall debt burden. In this way, at least, you are not throwing good money after bad – Euro Zone Governments a chance of getting their money back. OK, the ratings agencies may well call such a scheme a default, but at least the markets will understand that there is a comprehensive plan to deal with this mess – in any event, the market knows that there will be a default. A scheme of this kind, or something similar, will in my humble opinion, result is a major relief rally indeed. In addition, facilities will need to be put in place to recapitalise European banks, as a scheme of this kind will result in  Greek banks going bust

- most likely a number of banks in other peripheral countries. The cost will be enormous, but what the alternative.

The simple issue is that further austerity measures will result in the economies in these countries continuing to decline, which will make the existing debt burden greater. These countries need positive economic growth. “Hair shirt” type measures are a complete nonsense – the Germans are disciplined enough to accept them – other Euro Zone countries are not – just watch your TV and you will see the riots in Athens.

The Europeans were stupid enough to agree to a currency/monetary union (without a political/fiscal union, including a transfer system + verification), which was fundamentally flawed right at the outset – there is no easy way out. They now have to take the necessary medicine and hopefully, not be quite so stupid again (some hope).

A number of people are questioning whether the current Euro Zone can survive. Clearly it is more than a little shaky – but how can you kick out Greece. If there is to be a restructuring, Germany + a few others will have to leave the Euro Zone and set up Euro2, rather than Greece and quite possibly others leaving, to avoid the scenario of the Euro denominated debts in these peripheral countries, becoming a much larger burden.

The ECB signalled a rise in interest rates in July – pure madness in my view, given the current situation. However, the ECB is more concerned about its image rather than economic/financial reality (as a recent Economist article pointed out). As a result, a rate rise in July is near certain (I still think there is a small chance there will not be a rate rise – however, the ECB has to come to its senses).

However, forget any further rate rises – which are still being priced in by the markets – it just will not happen. The Euro, well its bounced a bit this week, but in my view, has significant downside risk from now on. The prospect of wider interest rate differentials will no longer support it. Indeed, even if the ECB hikes rates in July, I think there is a fair chance that rates will be reduced in due course, quite possibly this year.

A number of you think I’m being a bit harsh on the Euro Zone – well, I have banged on, for a very long time, as to the impossibility of the Euro Zone currency union, as currently constituted. This crisis was inevitable. Basically, I’m just sticking to my original and long held views.

Best

Kiron

PS For full disclosure purposes, I’m short the European banks – Santander, BBVA, Credit Agricole and Societe Generale and the IBEX.

Life Lessons from the Ultra Wealthy

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - June 19th, 2011, 8:30AM

>

I have a new column out in the Sunday Washington Post on the interesting lessons I have learned from people of great wealth. Its titled: “7 life lessons from the very wealthy.”

Here is an excerpt:

“Please excuse the very wealthy for feeling a bit under siege lately.

Taxes for the top 2 percent are very likely to go higher. Uncle Sam’s share of capital gains and dividend income might rise, and means-testing for Social Security and Medicare is probable. In the United States, the very rich hold most of that wealth in dollars, which are worth increasingly less. As income inequality has grown dramatically in the nation, the very wealthy are blamed for all manner of social ills.

Rather than pile on the wealthy, this week I’d like to approach the subject of money a little more philosophically. There are surprising insights to be gleaned from the experiences of the very wealthy regarding their investments and experience with wealth.

Some context: In my day job, I come into contact with very high-net-worth individuals. These include young technologists with modest portfolios to families that measure their wealth in nine and 10 figures. For the math-averse, that’s hundreds of millions to billions of dollars.

Over the years, I have had some fascinating conversations with people who have hospitals and graduate schools named after them. I’d like to share some of the things I have learned from these folks.”

You can find the 7 life lessons from the very wealthy here.

>

>

Source:
7 life lessons from the very wealthy
Barry Ritholtz
Washington Post June 18 Page G6| Updated: Friday, June 17, 9:45 PM
http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/7-life-lessons-from-the-very-wealthy/2011/06/15/AGxw6aaH_story.html

PDF

The Larry Sanders Show: The Complete Series ($59)

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - June 19th, 2011, 8:12AM

One of my favorite HBO series is — finally –  released in its entirety.

The Larry Sanders Show: The Complete Series is a full 17 discs covering covering 2800 minutes are normally $149.99, but there is a one day sale at Amazon for $59.99.

It is no surprise that the The Larry Sanders Show is ranked in TV Guide’s 50 Greatest TV Shows of All Time — though I would move it higher up than #38. (Friends at 21? Puh-Leeze)

The cast and writers for The Larry Sanders Show is a redonkulous who’s who of comedy: Jon Stewart, Rip Torn, Jeremy Piven, Jeffrey Tambor, Janeane Garofalo, Scott Thompson, Penny Johnson, plus countless celeb guests.

Here is a quick review:

The Larry Sanders Show is “how good television could be.” So proclaims Ricky Gervais in the definitive documentary “The Making of The Larry Sanders Show” included in this 17-disc boxed set that would be essential even without the prodigious bonus features . . . this long-overdue complete collection takes full measure of the groundbreaking series TV Guide listed 38th among the top 50 TV series of all time.

One could only imagine the exquisite ego-pierced pique that Larry Sanders (Garry Shandling), the angst-ridden, neurotic, and self-absorbed late-night talk show host, would exhibit upon learning of that ranking. It was Larry, in one of the series’ most memorable episodes, who went to desperate lengths to get Ben Stiller bumped so he could take Stiller’s place on People magazine’s Sexiest Man Alive list. The bracingly funny and show business savvy Larry Sanders Show set the stage for later classics of discomfort television Curb Your Enthusiasm, The Office, and Extras with its unflinching documentary style that captured the raw personalities and the chaotic process behind the production of a late-night talk show.

The set includes lots of extras: Intro by Garry Shandling, a documentary “The Making of The Larry Sanders Show;” 60-Page Collector’s Book; lots of behind the scenes clips, and all-new deleted scenes, all-new outtakes and bloopers.

Plus, Garry Shandling And Judd Apatow discuss “The Writer’s Process.”

~~~

More reviews after the jump:

Read the rest of this entry »

Apprenticed Investor: Lose the News

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - June 18th, 2011, 4:00PM

Apprenticed Investor: Lose the News
Barry Ritholtz
06/16/05 – 07:10 AM EDT

~~~

Have you ever noticed how the stock market reacts differently to the same reported events?

Why is it that we sometimes sell off “in response to rising oil prices,” but at other times the “market rallied, despite the rise in the price of crude”?

How come a selloff was caused by a suicide bombing in Iraq, but a week later, the markets shrugged off an even larger, deadlier bombing? Is it possible that the markets are responding to forces other than the latest headlines?

Short answer: Absolutely. Yes.

Longer answer: Keep reading.

As we discussed last week, it’s clear that predictions of pontificating pundits have an extremely short shelf life and can be safely ignored. But it’s not just the talking heads who can throw you off your game. The value of the entire financial news complex — both print and electronic — seems to be hugely misunderstood by investors.

Even worse, many investors misapply what they hear; they ignore data, focusing instead on headlines and occasionally, the opinions. There are at least three problems with this approach:

  • First, news is hardly new. The vast majority of it is backward-looking, informing you as to what has happened already. Investing is about what is going to happen; what’s occurred in the past may be of interest, but it’s hardly germane to the investment process. Indeed, by the time the news is “out,” it already has been built into the stock price.
  • Worse yet, old news can have an impact on your thought process. That’s why I read The Wall Street Journal on the train home, and not on the way to work. Why? It forces me to recognize that the news is stale, and I avoid allowing it to influence my decision-making process. Instead, it becomes for informational proposes only (Yes, I really do this).

  • Second, the vast majority of news is irrelevant to your investing.Sure, the data points on occasion may be important, but the rest is essentially infotainment and filler. I find CNBC both informative and entertaining — but it’s not the basis of my investment decisions. This explains why there aren’t any hedge funds running money on the basis of what’s on TV.Even with situations that involve binary events — a yes/no FDA decision, a litigation outcome, an earnings report — it’s not the news coverage of these that matters so much as the actual data point.

    Did the FDA approve a new drug or not? The subsequent reporting is irrelevant; it’s the event that matters.

    Quite often, it’s not the news that matters, but the reaction to the news. Look at Intel’s (INTC) midquarter update. It was good all around, but the stock has since slipped. That’s because the improved environment, especially for laptops, was already well known. It was fully built into Intel shares.

    When we consider events of even greater historical significance, we discover something rather astounding: Over the long haul, the markets ignore things like Pearl Harbor, JFK’s assassination and even the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks. Gary B. Smith showed how after their initial response, the markets resume whatever their prior trend was.

  • Third, because news organizations often try to appeal to as many people as possible, they have a disconcerting tendency to catch various trends just as they are peaking.
  • Have a look at these charts provided by Neal Frankle, author of Why Smart People Lose a Fortune. They offer a compelling explanation as to why the mainstream media should not be the source of your investment strategy; in fact, they can often be a strong contrary indicator.

    Source: Why Smart People Lose A Fortune, by Neal Frankle
    Source: Why Smart People Lose A Fortune, by Neal Frankle
    Source: Why Smart People Lose A Fortune, by Neal Frankle
    Source: Why Smart People Lose A Fortune, by Neal Frankle

    Avoid the Headline of the Day

    The news machine needs to create an enormous amount of content to have product to sell. Hours on TV and radio, pages in print and on the Web. Remember, most media are advertising-driven, and it requires all that content to be able to sell all those ads. (That’s why jokers like me are on so often).Just think about some of the recent headlines and their impact on both markets and individual stocks. The CEO of a major brokerage firm resigns — who cares! Martha gets out of jail: Whoop-de-doo!

    The media focus on the “sensationalistic or scandalous, rather than market-moving,” observes Real Money.com trading diarist James “Rev Shark” DePorre. “Stuff like the firing of a CEO, the housing “bubble” or Martha Stewart’s latest travails may be interesting, but they don’t help you much with your investments.”

    I agree with Shark’s contention that the “media are at their best when they focus on emerging market trends.” You know, the stuff that has yet to make the magazine covers or major headlines. That may give you a push in the direction of an investable theme. Unfortunately, this sort of coverage is rare and often found in specialty magazines such as Wired, CFO and The Economist.

    There are exceptions to every rule, and this one is no different. The most valuable thing the media can do for you is to grant you an audience with people you might not have access to otherwise.

    It’s particularly useful to see or read the wisdom from those people who do not need the publicity and have no agenda. They are merely identifying issues that they believe need to be addressed and that often are not.

    This isn’t to suggest that you should blindly follow the star investors: Simply because former General Electric (GE) chairman Jack Welch or Berkshire Hathaway’s (BRK.A) Warren Buffett say something will happen is no guarantee it’s going to come true. When others are opining about what’s to come — even the greats — you should have a healthy skepticism.

    Still, I will closely listen to any investment giant who has a spectacular track record over long periods of time, meaning his or her performance is not the result of mere chance.

    1. Expect to Be Wrong 2. Your Fault, Reader
    3. The Wrong Crowd 4. Bull or Bear? Neither
    5. Know Thyself 6. Prepare for Battle
    7. Bite Your Tongue 8. Don’t Speak, Part 2
    9. The Zen of Trading 10. The Folly of Forecasting
    Check back for more of Barry Ritholtz’s
    Apprenticed Investor series

    A few examples: T. Boone Pickens on Kudlow & Cramer a year ago saying oil’s price rise was not a temporary phenomena; Julian Robertson on CNBC discussing the dollar; Former Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker identifying structural imbalances in the U.S. economy in The Washington Post; and the Barron’s interviews with folks like Ned Davis, Ray Dalio, Walter Deemer, Seth Glickenhaus and others.Giving you access to such financial luminaries is one valuable service the media provide for investors. As for the rest, savvy investors know it’s mainly just noise and entertainment.

    42 queries. 1.041 seconds.