10 Afternoon Reads

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - July 19th, 2011, 4:30PM

More of today’s favorite reads:

• Gold’s run is almost over (Market Watch)
• New Kids Paying Manhattan Rents (WSJ)
• Insuring the bosses’ wallets (Economist)
• Obama Backs Senate Debt Plan (WSJ) see also Dangers of being wrong on Keynes (WaPo)
• Sign of Housing Bottom? Deja Vu All Over Again (Real Time Economics)
• Jay Rosen on Journalism in the Internet Age (The Browser)
• Google Spending Millions to Find the Next Google (NYT) see also Google: The Beginning (WSJ)
• Some Apple Directors Ponder CEO Succession (WSJ)
• The growth of atheism (Jason Collins)
• Obscure and Valuable Keyboard Shortcuts (Noupe)

What are you reading?

20 Most Expensive Google Adsense Keywords

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - July 19th, 2011, 2:30PM

Before we get to our chart porn du jour, lets look at Google’s top twenty keyword categories of highest costs per click via Wordstream:
>

20 Most Expensive Keyword Categories In Google AdWords
1. Insurance (example keyword: “auto insurance price quotes”)
2. Loans (example keyword: “consolidate graduate student loans”)
3. Mortgage (example keyword: “refinanced second mortgages”)
4. Attorney (example keyword: “personal injury attorney”)
5. Credit (example keyword: “home equity line of credit”)
6. Lawyer
7. Donate
8. Degree
9. Hosting
10. Claim
11. Conference Call
12. Trading
13. Software
14. Recovery
15. Transfer
16. Gas/Electricity
17. Classes
18. Rehab
19. Treatment
20. Cord Blood

Cord Blood? WTF is THAT about?

>

click for ginormous graphic

Source: 20 Most Expensive Google Keywords
Tech Crunch

Central Falls Leads the Field

Email this post Print this post
By Frederick Sheehan - July 19th, 2011, 11:30AM

Frederick Sheehan is the co-author of Greenspan’s Bubbles: The Age of Ignorance at the Federal Reserve.

His new book, Panderer for Power: The True Story of How Alan Greenspan Enriched Wall Street and Left a Legacy of Recession, was published by McGraw-Hill in November 2009. He was Director of Asset Allocation Services at John Hancock Financial Services in Boston. In this capacity, he set investment policy and asset allocation for institutional pension plans.

˜˜˜

Central Falls, Rhode Island faces a plight that should be studied for its application elsewhere. It is nearly out of money. This is common news today, whether in Greece or California. The various parties are assumed to possess a means to carry on. This is assumed because it is generally so. The banks had the Fed; General Electric had the Fed and the FDIC; Greece has the ECB; California is prepared to launch a bridge loan.

Despite the band aids, the trend towards insolvency continues. Central Falls has reached a dead end. Applications are manifold.

Quoting the New York Times (July 11, 2011): “The impoverished city, operating under a receiver for a year, has promised $80 million worth of retirement benefits to 214 police officers and firefighters, far more than it can afford. Those workers’ pension fund will probably run out of money in October…”

The retirees face a bleak future: “Central Falls, like many American cities, has not placed its police and firefighters in Social Security. Many have no other benefits to fall back on.”

The inability to meet payments, as is true across the western world, was evident decades ago. The parties refused to think through the consequences of their actions: “The city, just north of Providence, is small and poor, but over the years it has promised police officers and firefighters retirement benefits like those offered in big, rich states like California and New York. These uniformed workers can retire after just 20 years of service, receive free health care in retirement, and qualify for full disability pensions when only partly disabled.”

The previous paragraph reflects poorly on the grand wizards of Central Falls. The Times noted: “Central Falls…filled mostly with immigrant families, struggles on a median household income of less than $33,520 a year…. The typical single-family house… is worth about $130,000.”

Although this was a news story, the Times reporters, Mary Williams Walsh and Abby Goodnough, could not restrain their fury: “It is hard to see how anyone thought such an impoverished tax base could come up with an additional $80 million for retirement benefits. If the city were contributing the recommended amount to the plan each year, it would take 57 percent of local property tax revenue.”

That is hindsight. We are used to expedients: delayed pension contributions; 8% projected investment returns; economic recoveries around the corner; market recoveries around the corner; real-estate appreciation (higher tax receipts); higher tax rates; bank loans; bond issues; state bailouts; federal bailouts.

These avenues are closed. The state of Rhode Island “has an investment-grade credit rating, but it is in no position to bail out a string of teetering cities, or take over their shaky local pension funds the way the federal government does when some companies go bankrupt.” The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation is the backstop to private pension plans. None exists for public plans. (Could there be a Christmas Eve Special – see emergency decrees on December 24, 2009, when no one was looking – that sweeps all public pension benefits into Uncle Sugar’s side pocket? No doubt. Minds in Washington are much slower than in Central Falls.)

The state of Rhode Island may follow its mendicant municipality’s plight: “Rhode Island must …stabilize its own pension fund, which continues to require more and more cash each year, despite four overhauls since 2005 that were supposed to get the cost under control. The Securities and Exchange Commission is investigating. If the state turns out to have understated its commitments, it could deliver a new jolt to bond markets still nervous after two traumatic years.”

Rhode Island is reluctant to seek federal aid for itself (a possible source of funds for Central Falls): “State lawmakers are trying to contain the damage, mindful that it would be a bad time for any state to seek help in Washington.” As a practical matter, one in four of the cities and towns in Rhode Island are in “some degree of distress.” A well-funded state would not know where to start.

A bright side to Central Falls’ requiem is that it must make decisions today that most others will avoid as long as possible.

An example of the latter is Cambridge Hospital in Cambridge, Massachusetts. The Boston Globe (July 11, 2011) reported: “A state Superior Court judge has ruled that the owner of Cambridge Hospital can’t move forward with its plan to cut retiree health benefits for 289 nurses, a decision being hailed as a victory by the Massachusetts Nurses Association.”

The judge is delirious. He would fit right in with the empty suits at the European Central Bank. Living in a world of make-believe, he (and they) interpret laws and freeze reality as if it were 1953. (Under Massachusetts law, courts are to interpret pension benefits within “reasonable expectations” of the beneficiary.)

Cutting to the chase, the owner of the hospital is down to its last buck. “An accounting change… would increase the hospital system’s costs by about $30 million over the next three years. The proposed cut [40% of the current benefit] prompted the union to reject a “last and final” contract offer last summer.”

As with Central Falls, the avenues to acquire cash are shut (extrapolating from the article). The judge decided to ignore the facts and make matters worse for the nurses. Matters will be worse because, as the old adage goes, if you’re going bankrupt, it’s better to be first.

The citizens of Central Falls are not going to rust. They need to think. The city may be able to sell or lease assets.  It could ignore federal laws and regulations imposed on cities unless Washington funds its impositions on Central Falls.  Of this, there is no chance. The feds would probably be more fearful of this tactic gaining publicity than of prosecuting city officials. Such an ultimatum would probably cut Central Falls spending by 50%.  The city could issue scrip to employees and suppliers. Scrip is “emergency money” that was used across the United States in the 1930s. (See: Standard Catalogue of Depression Scrip of the United States, by Ralph A. Mitchell and Neil Shafer.)  Merchants chose whether or not to accept it. It was often accepted during the 1930s, at least for a time, when a solution beckoned.

In general, the better solutions will accrue to those who sell first. Early sellers will get better prices. At some point there will be a flood of selling. It is impossible to know when that will be. As a guess, sometime after the next 30% stock market dive. This, as a guess, will happen after the U.S. government, stock-market support operation fails. All government support operations fail.

The sellers will include leveraged companies, banks (all are leveraged, by definition, in a fractional reserve system), pension plans, the so-called “rich” (many need to sell surplus houses and golf-club memberships to pay tuitions), endowments, hospitals, colleges, the sports industry, and municipalities. The latter will have to sell or lease highways, parking garages, bridges, sewer systems, water systems, utilities, and many other services traditionally provided by states, counties and towns: from garbage to schools.

There is a visceral resistance by municipalities to such thinking: The private sector is not to be trusted. Central Falls may be fortunate in selling to the enemy before prices plunge. A great buyer’s market is in the making.

Historic Highest Marginal Tax Rate 1913-2011

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - July 19th, 2011, 11:30AM

John Roque of WJB Capital Group takes a very different look at the highest tax bracket:  Tracking historic average of rates since 1913 versus standard deviations from the norm :

>

Technical Look at Tax Rates (1913-Present)

click for larger chart

10 Tuesday AM Reads

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - July 19th, 2011, 9:30AM

My morning roundup:

• Wall Street’s Newest Regulator a Longtime Foe (Deal Book)
• Could News Corp end up in play? (Reuters) see also News Corp. Trading at 50% Discount Signals Life Without Murdoch: Real M&A (Bloomberg)
• Stranger moves into foreclosed home, citing little-knownTexas law (K Houston)
Its a topsy turvy world! Wall Street Journal proves Keynes was right (Salon)
• The Scourge of the Faith-Based Paper Dollar (WSJ)
•  The Great Global Debt Depression: It’s All Greek To Me (Global Research) see also What hope is there for us if America is driven to the brink of meltdown? (Guardian)
• How One Man Hacked His Way Into the Slot-Machine Industry (Wired)
• Quick 50 writing tools (Poynter Institute)
• Why social marketing doesn’t work (FT)
• Discreet nonprofit American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) writes bills for conservative lawmakers (Raw Story)

What are you reading?

RealtyTrac’s Sharga on Housing Fix

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - July 19th, 2011, 9:24AM

~~~

Source:
Rick Sharga’s Rx for Govt. Housing Fix: First, Do No Harm
Aaron Task
Daily Ticker July 18, 2011
http://finance.yahoo.com/blogs/daily-ticker/rick-sharga-rx-govt-housing-fix-first-no-144321335.html

Three Competing Theories

Email this post Print this post
By John Mauldin - July 19th, 2011, 8:30AM

Three Competing Theories
By John Mauldin
July 17, 2011

~~~

Long-time readers are familiar with the wisdom of Lacy Hunt. He is a regular feature of Outside the Box. He writes a quarterly piece for Hoisington Asset Management in Austin, and this is one of his better ones. Read it twice.

“While the massive budget deficits and the buildup of federal debt, if not addressed, may someday result in a substantial increase in interest rates, that day is not at hand. The U.S. economy is too fragile to sustain higher interest rates except for interim, transitory periods that have been recurring in recent years. As it stands, deflation is our largest concern …”

As I write, Europe is starting to unravel. This is going to be much worse than 2008, at least as far as Europe is concerned, and odds are high that it will be very bad for the US. And the markets are still acting as if the problems in Europe can be resolved. The recent bank stress tests were a joke, as they assumed no Greek or Irish defaults. This simply can’t be. There is a banking crisis of massive proportions in our future.

As Lacy notes, we are testing the economic theories of three (I think von Mises should be added) dead white guys. The dominant theories are being shown to be wrong. The sooner we acknowledge that the better. But don’t hold your breath waiting for the major economic schools to come to grips with their failure.

This is a real problem, and there is just no way to avoid it. I wish I had more positive things to say.

Your trying to figure this out analyst,

John Mauldin, Editor
Outside the Box

JohnMauldin@2000wave.com

Three Competing Theories

By Lacy Hunt, Hoisington Asset Management

The three competing theories for economic contractions are: 1) the Keynesian, 2) the Friedmanite, and 3) the Fisherian. The Keynesian view is that normal economic contractions are caused by an insufficiency of aggregate demand (or total spending). This problem is to be solved by deficit spending. The Friedmanite view, one shared by our current Federal Reserve Chairman, is that protracted economic slumps are also caused by an insufficiency of aggregate demand, but are preventable or ameliorated by increasing the money stock. Both economic theories are consistent with the widely-held view that the economy experiences three to seven years of growth, followed by one to two years of decline. The slumps are worrisome, but not too daunting since two years lapse fairly quickly and then the economy is off to the races again. This normal business cycle framework has been the standard since World War II until now.

The Fisherian theory is that an excessive buildup of debt relative to GDP is the key factor in causing major contractions, as opposed to the typical business cycle slumps (Chart 1). Only a time consuming and difficult process of deleveraging corrects this economic circumstance. Symptoms of the excessive indebtedness are: weakness in aggregate demand; slow money growth; falling velocity; sustained underperformance of the labor markets; low levels of confidence; and possibly even a decline in the birth rate and household formation. In other words, the normal business cycle models of the Keynesian and Friedmanite theories are overwhelmed in such extreme, overindebted situations.

Economists are aware of Fisher’s views, but until the onset of the present economic circumstances they have been largely ignored, even though Friedman called Irving Fisher “America’s greatest economist.” Part of that oversight results from the fact that Fisher’s position was not spelled out in one complete work. The bulk of his ideas are reflected in an article and book written in 1933, but he made important revisions in a series of letters later written to FDR, which currently reside in the Presidential Library at Hyde Park.

Read the rest of this entry »

Morning stuff

Email this post Print this post
By Peter Boockvar - July 19th, 2011, 8:07AM

The Greek drama may be coming to a head this week as an ECB member revealed a crack in their resistance to any sort of Greek default. ECB member Nowotny implied that a ‘selective default’ may be acceptable to the ECB and how the rating agencies want to classify it may not be that important to them. A ‘selective default’ will likely take the form of a debt extension where short term paper is swapped for longer term debt. Combined with this may be a Greek debt buyback financed by the EFSF. The debt swap possibility has the Greek 2 yr, the security that will bear the brunt of this, getting slammed again with the yield spiking 250 bps to 38.5%. The debt of Italy, Spain, Ireland and Portugal however are bouncing as maybe the Greek fire can again be put out on Thursday when EU officials meet formally again. For months, it was the ECB’s polluted balance sheet that was standing in the way of a Greek restructuring, whichever form it would end up taking. German ZEW 6 month economic confidence figure fell to the lowest since Jan ’09 but interestingly the current condition component rose to just shy of the highest on record dating back to ’91.

June Housing Starts totaled 629k annualized, 54k higher than expected and is up from 549k in May (revised down by 11k). Both single and multi family categories contributed to the rise. Single family starts were up by 39k to 453k, the most since Nov. While good for the construction component of GDP, we don’t need new single family homes with all the existing homes still on the market but single family Permits, the precursor to starts, were up just 1k. The area where we can use new inventory is in multi family as vacancies are dropping and the US experiences a secular decline in the homeownership rate. Multi family starts rose by 41k to the most since Jan at 176k and permits were up by 14k to 217k, the most since Oct ’08. In terms of construction jobs in this hard hit sector, permits exceeded housing completions, thus providing enough jobs for new projects for those finishing old ones. Bottom line, I repeat again that we don’t need an increase in single family housing starts with a 9.3 month inventory to sales ratio of existing homes but hopefully the pace of permits will prove the June jump as being an outlier (admittingly, the pace is still extremely depressed). Multi family is where the housing construction benefits are being seen and that will be the case for years to come.

Is a Deleveraging Consumer Spending Less ?

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - July 19th, 2011, 6:00AM

Killer chart this week from David Leonhardt (We’re Spent), which very much supports the weak post crisis recovery thesis, as consumers cut back much more sharply. They are delveraging rather than adding more debt, this they cvannot spend they way they did previously.

>

Click for ginormous chart:

Source: Slumps in Consumer Spending, NYT

>

Source:
We’re Spent
DAVID LEONHARDT
NYT July 16, 2011
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/17/sunday-review/17economic.html

Sovereign Debt and Geriatric Deadbeats

Email this post Print this post
By Global Macro Monitor - July 19th, 2011, 5:41AM

In the spirit of our earlier post, The Clash of Generations, we point you to an interesting piece, Geiatric Deadbeats, written by Ali Alichi of the International Monetary Fund (IMF).   He argues the age of a country’s population is inversely correlated with a sovereign government’s willingness to pay its debt obligations.

Because holders of sovereign loans and bonds generally have no explicit recourse to hard assets or a “sovereign balance sheet” in the event of default, a debtor government’s willingness to pay is almost as important as its ability to pay.   Go no further than Europe or the debt ceiling negotiations in the U.S. Congress for confirmation.

Mr. Alichi writes,

Studies have shown that a country’s willingness to repay is as important as whether it has the resources to repay. This willingness deteriorates as voters age because they have a shorter period to benefit from their country’s access to international capital markets and become more likely to opt for default on current debt. Moreover, older voters generally benefit more from public resources—such as pension and health care benefits—which could shrink if debt is repaid. If the old are a majority, they might force default, even if it is not optimal for the country as a whole. Lenders will take this into account and reduce new lending to an aging country.

Thomas Friedman spoke yesterday in his New York Times column of the “powerful sense of ‘baby boomers behaving badly’ and their legacy of the “incredible debt burden and constraints” they will leave on their children.   According to Mr. Alichi this bad behavior of the boomers may not end at retirement.   He writes,

Now if the old are altruistic and care about their children as much as themselves, they will not vote for default with its negative consequences for future generations. But Altonji, Hayashi, and Kotlikoff (1997) have shown that altruism does not hold at the overall level in the United States—although there are few studies of this sort for most other countries.

The next ten years will surely be interesting.    We at the Global Macro Monitor are baby boomers and implore our generation, at least, those who can afford it, to take one for the kids.  If this means we have to play muni golf courses instead of Pebble Beach and Pinehurst and hitting Top Fiites instead of Pro V1s (sorry FILA) in our twilight years, so be it.

Mr. Alichi has some good ideas on how to improve our national credit profile.  His piece is short and sweet and well worth your time.  Click here for the article.

>

(click here if charts are not observable)

46 queries. 1.066 seconds.