Tuesday Afternoon Reads

Email this post Print this post
By Anna W - August 16th, 2011, 5:00PM

The latest adds to my Instapaper:

• Stop the Panic. It’s Not 2008. (Daily Beast)
• What HFT Hedge Funds Tell Us About Carried Interest (Obsolete Dogma)
• Gold’s climb is perfectly rational (CNN Money)
• What Is Business Waiting For? (NYT) see also It’s the Aggregate Demand, Stupid (Economix)
• Debt Crisis Threatens to Taint Broader Economy (NYT)
• Tax the super-rich or riots will rage in 2012 (Market Watch)
• The moral decay of our society is as bad at the top as the bottom (Telegraph)
• Five Tips for Marketers From MTV’s Study of Millennials’ Digital Habits (Ad Age)
• The Death of Booting Up (Slate) see also Microsoft Faces the Post-PC World (WSJ)
• MPAA Lobbies For Wall Street Reform (Torrent Freak)

What are you reading?

>

click for larger graphic

via Indexed

Fisker Karma Test Drive

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - August 16th, 2011, 4:30PM

>

Fisker Santa Monica recently held an exclusive test drive event for deposit holders. Professional drive Kyle Shields goes into detail about what makes the Karma so unique.

Fisker Santa Monica test drives the Karma

Hat tip Plug in cars

Cohan Says Close Wall Street Casino Cut Pay In Half

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - August 16th, 2011, 4:23PM

Source:
Cohan Says Close Wall Street Casion Cut Pay In Half,
Bloomberg

Authenticity

Email this post Print this post
By Bob Lefsetz - August 16th, 2011, 4:00PM

Last night I read an article about Five Guys Burgers.

In case they haven’t come to you yet, Five Guys is a chain similar to California’s fabled In-N-Out, featuring fresh ingredients and few options. They don’t implore you to have it your way, they do it their way. However, Five Guys does allow you to choose from a modicum of toppings, a veritable no-no at In-N-Out, whose options are off the menu and only known to aficionados who demonstrate their membership in the club by ordering “animal style” or “four by four” burgers. You can’t even get milk at Five Guys. Why? Because kids hate milk and the proprietor wants kids to see a visit to Five Guys as a treat, with absolutely no concession to mommies and health, just pure, unadulterated indulgence.

Want one yet? Even the writer gave up his vegetarian status to indulge. He couldn’t resist the hand-formed beef patty on the artisan bun.

They serve a plethora of fries, even list where the spuds come from on a chalkboard.

And it took twenty five years for the family to get it right and the chain is burgeoning, even Coran Capshaw is in on the deal, possessing franchising rights in many states, hell, even Irving Azoff owns one in the West Valley.

Not that most people know that. Not that that’s relevant.

Then again, hasn’t Coran’s empire been built on the most authentic act of its era, the Dave Matthews Band?

Yes, the key to Five Guys Burgers’ success is authenticity. They quote this guy Jim Gilmore, co-author of “Authenticity: What Consumers Really Want”. He goes on and on about the “texture” of their operations, but all you need to know is:

“The Murrells also shun national advertising campaigns, which they find fake, and instead rely on word of mouth. When President Obama moved to the White House, a Five Guys staffer suggested sending him a T-shirt. ‘That’s cheap!’ Murrell shot back. Playing coy worked, and soon Obama, trailed by TV cameras, stopped by a store. He ordered a cheeseburger with lettuce, tomato, fresh jalapenos, and mustard – a classic example of Five Guys’ formula that sells 2 million burgers a week and was named Zagat’s ‘best fast food burger’ for 2010.”

And that’s why Five Guys is a runaway success and most musical acts have the shelf life of a doughnut. You perfect the product, you let people come to you, you play for the long haul. Publicity is passe. If you’re great, the public will find you. Everything you knew in the nineties is history. People can smell the hype, they’re craving authenticity.

Authenticity means you know how to play.

Authenticity means you don’t dance on stage, unless you’re spontaneously inspired, choreography is taboo.

Authenticity means you write your own songs.

Authenticity means you don’t go on morning television shows.

Authenticity means you know fans are first.

Authenticity means you know without your fans, you’re nothing.

You write and sing from the heart because you have to, not because you got an MBA and want to get rich.

Yes, the public is craving something real. And we’ve got a whole industry built on not providing it. The music infrastructure is teetering because it’s built upon a foundation of crap. The only acts people want to see with consistency tend to be over fifty, who did it right back then and can tour until they drop, which they’re gonna.

Sure, there are exceptions. But don’t you get it? When you co-write and polish to perfection, when you get a clothing line and consider yourself a brand, when you hype perfume and refuse to be honest, never saying a negative word, you’re working against yourself.

The public craves authenticity. According to the Oxford Dictionary, that’s an adjective meaning:

1 of undisputed origin; genuine

-made or done in the traditional or original way, or in a way that faithfully resembles an original : the restaurant serves authentic Italian meals | every detail of the movie was totally authentic.

- based on facts; accurate or reliable : an authentic depiction of the situation.

- (in existentialist philosophy) relating to or denoting an emotionally appropriate, significant, purposive, and responsible mode of human life.

Let authenticity be your credo. Know that like Five Guys nothing great’s an overnight success. Get the formula right before you try to grow. And don’t change who you are once you’ve broken through, be humble and original, retain your rough edges, every concession to the mainstream works against you.

http://buswk.co/nTqsR6


Visit the archive: http://lefsetz.com/wordpress/

http://www.twitter.com/lefsetz


If you would like to subscribe to the LefsetzLetter,

http://www.lefsetz.com/lists/?p=subscribe&id=1

Euro Debt Visual

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - August 16th, 2011, 3:30PM

Click For Interactive Graphic:

Source: Euro debt visual, Google Public Data Explorer

Hat tip DFox

Der Spiegel Interview with George Soros

Email this post Print this post
By John Mauldin - August 16th, 2011, 12:00PM

Der Spiegel Interview with George Soros
By John Mauldin
August 14, 2011

~~~

This week’s Outside the Box is in the tradition of showing the other side of the argument. Normally, anything George Soros says or does politically has my blood pressure up about 20 points. Yet, I posted another piece of his today in Over My Shoulder – and then ran across this longer piece from Der Spiegel. Note this is from a dedicated Europhile wanting to save the euro. He succintly outlines what must be done if it is to be saved, and does it as well as anyone. (I know that among my readers there are both likers and haters of Soros, but as an observer of markets he is to be respected. And this is an article in which his acumen is in evidence.

I refer you to last week’s regular letter (one of my more important ones: http://www.johnmauldin.com/frontlinethoughts/the-beginning-of-the-endgame) and also to the Outside the Box piece I passed on from Michael Lewis, in which he points out that to survive, the rest of Europe must learn to behave more like Germans. This is the great objection of the euro-skeptics, since the rest of Europe does not want to be like Germans. But Soros is right to some extent when he says, “There is simply no alternative. If the euro were to break up, it would cause a banking crisis that would be totally outside the control of the financial authorities. So it would push not only Germany, not only Europe, but also the whole world into conditions very reminiscent of the Great Depression in the 1930s, which was also caused by a banking crisis that was out of control.”

We find ourselves in a binary world. Either Europe goes to a fiscal union with the various countries losing control of their budgets, or the Eurozone breaks up. As I recently wrote, we must not underestimate the commitment of the European elites to do whatever it takes to hold their project together. Neither must we underestimate the ability of voters to change their leaders. This is a very volatile situation with far more implications than our subprime problem.

I continue to say that a euro crisis will lead to a recession (or worse) in the US. Attention must be paid. Soros lays out the Euro-elite agenda. I suggest you read.

Your euro-skeptic analyst,

John Mauldin, Editor
Outside the Box

JohnMauldin@2000wave.com

Der Spiegel Interview with George Soros

‘You Need This Dirty Word, Euro Bonds’

In a SPIEGEL interview, billionaire investor George Soros criticizes Germany’s lack of leadership in the euro zone, arguing that Berlin must dictate to Europe the solution to the currency crisis. He also argues in favor of the creation of euro bonds as a way out of the turbulence.

SPIEGEL: Mr. Soros, we currently see a global banking crisis, a currency crisis and a sovereign debt crisis. Has the financial dilemma become too big to handle? How can politicians on both sides of the Atlantic be expected to solve such a multitude of crises?

Soros: The politicians have not really tried to fix any crisis; they have so far tried only to buy time. But sometimes time actually works against you if you refuse to face the relevant issues and explain to the public what is at stake.

SPIEGEL: Are you talking about the Germans? Many experts think Chancellor Angela Merkel has been particularly hesitant to address the euro crisis.

Soros: Yes. The future of the euro depends on Germany. This is the point I really want to drive home. Germany is in the driver’s seat because it is the largest country in Europe with the best credit rating and a chronic surplus. In a crisis, the creditor always calls the shots. Sure, this is not a position Germany or Chancellor Merkel ever desired and they are understandably reluctant to embrace it. But the fact is that Germans are now in the position of dictating to Europe what the solution to the euro crisis is.

SPIEGEL: Why should Berlin embrace that idea?

Soros: There is simply no alternative. If the euro were to break up, it would cause a banking crisis that would be totally outside the control of the financial authorities. So it would push not only Germany, not only Europe, but also the whole world into conditions very reminiscent of the Great Depression in the 1930s, which was also caused by a banking crisis that was out of control.

SPIEGEL: What, then, needs to be done to fight this crisis?

Soros: I think there is only one choice. It is not a question of whether Europe needs a common currency. The euro exists, and if it were to break apart, all hell would break loose. Germany has to make it work. To make it work, you have got to allow the members of the euro zone to be able to refinance the bulk of their debt on reasonable terms. So you need this dirty word: “euro bonds”. But when you study what it involves to have euro bonds, you really have a problem because each European country remains in control of its own fiscal policy, and you have to rely on the country to meet its financial obligations.

SPIEGEL: Germans hate the euro bonds idea. They fear that under this scenario they will ultimately need to bail out everyone, even large nations like Italy.

Soros: That is why you need to establish fiscal rules that will ensure the solvency of every member. This should make the euro bond acceptable to German voters. Europe needs a fiscal authority that has not only financial but also political legitimacy. The difficulty is agreeing on the rules. Unfortunately, Germans have some funny ideas. They want the rest of Europe to follow their example. But what works for Germany can’t work for the rest of Europe: No country can run a chronic surplus without others running deficits. Germany must propose rules that other countries can also follow. These rules must allow for a gradual reduction in indebtedness. They must also allow countries with high unemployment, like Spain, to continue running cyclical budget deficits until they recover.

SPIEGEL: More and more economists, especially in Germany, would like to see Greece leave the European Union. Do you consider that to be a viable option?

Soros: I think that the Greek problem has been sufficiently mishandled by the European authorities that this may well be the best solution. Europe, the euro and the financial system could survive Greece leaving. It could survive Portugal leaving. And the remainder would be stronger and more easily managed. But the financial authorities have to arrange for an orderly exit in order for the European banking system to survive it. That will cost money because the European banking system including the European Central Bank has to be indemnified for its losses. Depositors in Greek banks also need to be protected. Otherwise, depositors in Irish or Italian banks will not feel safe.

SPIEGEL: Is the current crisis even worse than the one in 2008?

Soros: This crisis is still the continuation of the same crisis. In 2008, the financial system collapsed and it had to be put on artificial life support. The authorities managed to save the system. But the imbalances that caused the crisis have not been removed.

SPIEGEL: What do you mean?

Soros: The method the authorities rightly chose three years ago was to substitute the credit of the state for the credit in the financial system that collapsed. After the failure of Lehman Brothers, the European financial ministers issued a declaration that no other systemically important financial institutions would be allowed to fail. That was the artificial life support; it was exactly the right decision. But then Chancellor Merkel stated that such support would only be granted by each EU member state individually, and not by the European Union.

SPIEGEL: That undermined the concept of a strong European response to the crisis. Has that been the biggest mistake so far?

Soros: That Merkel statement was the origin of the euro crisis. It shattered the vision that the EU will protect the euro in a joint effort.

SPIEGEL: Where will the current crisis stop? Even France now seems to be threatened by a financial meltdown.

Soros: Of course it is spreading. Markets fear uncertainty. Germany has to realize that it has no alternative but to defend the euro. The longer it takes, the higher the price Germany will have to pay.

SPIEGEL: You have been very critical of how the crisis has been handled by governments. Many European citizens, however, blame speculators like you for their attempts to bring down the euro. Huge hedge funds like yours have waged massive bets against the European currency over the past year. And in recent days, several European countries have even imposed temporary bans on short selling, bets on falling share prices.

Soros: You are confusing markets and speculators. At the moment, the biggest speculators are the central banks because they are the most important buyers and sellers of currencies. Hedge funds have definitely been supplanted by central banks. Markets expect the authorities to produce a financial system that actually holds together. If there is any hole in that system, speculators will rush through that hole.

SPIEGEL: That sounds very noble. But in reality, speculation makes any crisis worse. Look at the credit default swaps (CDS) market where speculators can bet on a further decline of currencies and economies. How can that be helpful?

Soros: Of course, speculation will always make a crisis worse. If there is a weak point, it will expose it. And you are right, the CDS market is a very dangerous instrument and I think it should not be allowed. I am one of the very few people who argue that the CDS is a dangerous instrument because it is so lop-sided in favor of a negative outcome.

‘You Can Count on China To Back the Euro’

SPIEGEL: Do you think the European Central Bank is part of the solution or part of the problem when it comes to the dealing with the euro crisis?

Soros: It is part of the solution, but which part? Any central bank should only be in charge of liquidity. Solvency is a matter for the treasury. But because there is no European treasury, the ECB was pushed into that arena. To keep the financial system alive they overstepped their limits, as the former German Bundesbank president Axel Weber pointed out, by discounting the government bonds of a country that was clearly bankrupt.

SPIEGEL: You are referring to the purchase of Greek bonds. Now the European Central Bank even started buying Spanish and Italian bonds. It is not even clear, however, if it is legally allowed to do so.

Soros: Yes, but there is a well-established conviction that the central banks always do what is necessary to keep the system going and then afterwards you then take care of the legal aspects. In a crisis, you simply do not have time to think about such concerns for too long.

SPIEGEL: The United States is drowning in even more debt than Europeans. Its economic recovery has been painful. Are we going to see a double-dip recession in the US?

Soros: The indebtedness of the US is not all that high, but if a double-dip recession was in doubt a few weeks ago, it is less in doubt now, because financial markets have a very safe way of predicting the future. They cause it. And the markets have decided that America is going to see a recession, particularly after the recent downgrade of the US by the rating agency Standard & Poor’s.

SPIEGEL: President Barack Obama has been fiercely criticized for his handling of the economy. You were one of his biggest supporters in 2008. Are you happy with his economic policy?

Soros: No, of course not. But the reality is that we have had 25 years of excesses building up in America — a combustible mix of too much credit and too much leverage. You need a long time to reverse that.

SPIEGEL: Obama tried to stimulate growth with a gigantic stimulus program which increased the national debt further. Was that a mistake?

Soros: Obama embraced the ideas of John Maynard Keynes. Basically, the analysis of Keynes is still very relevant — with one big difference between now and the 1930s. In the 1930s, governments had practically no debt and could therefore run deficits. Nowadays, all governments are heavily indebted, and that is a big change.

SPIEGEL: If Keynes were still alive, would he adjust his theory?

Soros: Definitely. He would say governments can still benefit from running fiscal deficits, but the new debt has to be invested in a way that will pay for itself. So the money spent would have to increase productivity.

SPIEGEL: The $800 billion stimulus program launched by Obama did not live up to that?

Soros: Obama’s stimulus program was not big enough and it was not directed at improving infrastructure nor human capital. So it was not productive enough.

SPIEGEL: And any further stimulus is now basically a non-starter, because the conservative majority in Congress is hell-bent on preventing it.

Soros: That is what is pushing the world towards another recession, into a double dip.

SPIEGEL: The Republicans are doing that?

Soros: Yes, but Obama is also at fault. He yielded the agenda to the Republicans. He is talking their language. The president would have to show leadership to counter the Republican wave, and so far he has not done so.

SPIEGEL: Do you think the US deserved the recent downgrade by Standard & Poor’s?

Soros: Probably not. This decision was the attempt by the rating agencies to reinvent themselves as anticipating rather than responding to changes that have occurred. So they are really basing that downgrade on the expectation that the political process will not provide the solution. Judging such political developments is a very new role for the rating agencies, though.

SPIEGEL: As an investor, do you listen to the rating agencies?

Soros: Well, I do not, but many other investors do.

SPIEGEL: The credit rating agencies are accused of exacerbating the crisis. Do you think the role of the rating agencies in the financial system needs to be scaled back?

Soros: I do not have an answer to that.

SPIEGEL: There are no alternatives.

Soros: Frankly. It is an unsolved problem in my mind

SPIEGEL: As an investor, would you still bet on the euro?

Soros: I certainly would not short the euro because China has an interest in having an alternative to the dollar. You can count on China to back the efforts of the European authorities to maintain the euro.

SPIEGEL: Is that the reason why the euro is still so strong compared to the dollar?

Soros: Yes. There is a mysterious buyer that keeps propping up the euro.

SPIEGEL: And it is not you.

Soros: It is not me (laughs).

SPIEGEL: In the end, will China be the only winner in this crisis?

Soros: China, of course, has been the great winner of globalization, and if globalization collapses, the Chinese will also be among the losers. So they have a strong interest in preserving the current global system. However, in some ways, they have been just as reluctant to accept it as the Germans. Germans have been hesitant to accept responsibility for Europe, and the Chinese have been hesitant to accept responsibility for the world. But they are both being pushed into it.

SPIEGEL: Mr. Soros, we thank you for this interview.

Interview conducted by Gregor Peter Schmitz and Thomas Schulz



No eurobond, EFSF the same, and a financial tax

Email this post Print this post
By Peter Boockvar - August 16th, 2011, 11:59AM

The lack of talk on a Eurobond, the belief that the EFSF is big enough and the proposal for a financial transaction tax is what disappointed our market as Europe is of course closed. The euro did rally though back to unchanged as Merkel and Sarkozy did propose a Euro Zone Economic Council which implies they want a more coordinated fiscal policy amongst all the members to have some economic union and to have better supervision over the less disciplined. More fiscal economic policy cooperation is what the euro missed during its existence as the only coordination was with the ECB and monetary policy. But, this of course falls short of the Eurobond that some hoped, unrealistically I believe, for today as the Germans are going to have to have a real introspection of how much they want to extend themselves for the rest of the region.

Worry About Important Things — Not The Death Cross

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - August 16th, 2011, 11:30AM

In July 2010, Bianco Reserch highlighted an analysis by Ron Griess at TheChartStore.com of every instance of the death cross (aka dark cross) since 1930.  Below are his results.

The first table shows the performance of the S&P Composite for the time periods listed when the 50-day moving average is falling and crosses a rising 200-day moving average. (Dark Cross)

The second table shows the performance of the S&P Composite for the time periods listed when the 50-day moving average is falling and crosses a falling 200-day moving average. (Death Cross)

The bottom line: There are lots of things to worry about, but this is not one of them — its a low probability indicator:

>

Dark Cross

50-day ma falling across a rising 200-day moving average.

~~~

Death Cross

50-day ma falling across a falling 200-day ma

Belated Tuesday AM Reads

Email this post Print this post
By Anna W - August 16th, 2011, 10:15AM

Lost my damn keys — running late today — here are some interesting items for your reading pleasure:

• Was There Insider Trading on S.&P.’s Downgrade? (DealBook) see also What Downgrade? Stocks Get It Back (WSJ) see also
• When money brought us together (Boston.com)
• Market’s got you down? Trade like a man (Market Watch)
Roubini: Did George W. Bush cause this budget crisis? (Yes) (Money MSN)
• How Canada’s TD Bank Is Invading U.S. Market (WSJ)
• Paulson, Soros Pared Financial Stocks Last Quarter Before Losses (Busniessweek)
Galbraith: Fixing the economy: We got it wrong (LA Times)
• Buffett Takes Off the Gloves? He’s Getting Worried. (Jeff Matthews Is Not Making This Up) see also Buffett higher tax call strikes a nerve (Reuters)
• Nevada Joins States Balking at Bank Releases in Foreclosure Practices Deal (Bloomberg)see also One answer to the foreclosure mess: More immigrants (LA Times)
• Apple-Google Duel for Mobile Supremacy Boon for Lawyers (Bloomberg)

What are you reading?

>

Fitch says AAA ok, for now

Email this post Print this post
By Peter Boockvar - August 16th, 2011, 8:58AM

In contrast to S&P who immersed themselves directly in the US political process and didn’t even wait to see what the Congressional committee would come up with in November in terms of budget cuts, Fitch is taking a more patient role as they reiterate the AAA rating of the US with a stable outlook but with caveats and an eye toward November. Their AAA rating “reflects the fact that the key pillars of the US’s exceptional creditworthiness remains intact: its pivotal role in the global financial system and the flexible, diversified and wealthy economy that provides its revenue base.” They did say though that they will “review its fiscal projections in light of the outcome of the deliberations of the Joint Select Committee as well as its near and medium-term economic outlook for the US by the end of the year. An upward revision to Fitch’s medium to long-term projections for public debt either as a result of weaker than expected economic recovery or the failure of the Joint Select Committee to reach agreement on at least $1.2T of deficit reduction measures would LIKELY RESULT IN NEGATIVE ACTION. The rating action would most likely be a revision of the rating Outlook to Negative, which would indicate a greater than 50% chance of a downgrade over a 2 yr horizon. Less likely would be a one notch downgrade.”

46 queries. 1.030 seconds.