10 Tuesday AM Reads

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - September 27th, 2011, 9:51AM

In addition to Greek yogurt and a banana, here’s what I am digesting this morning:

• Share Traders More Reckless Than Psychopaths, Study Shows (Spiegel Onlinesee also Rogue hormones (Economist)
Hulbert: Stop blaming Greece! (Market Watch)
• Narrative Over Numbers (Slate) see also El-Erian Sees Global Economy Slowing in 2012 ? (Bloomberg)
• Housing market is terrific, if you are rich (USA Today)
• Buffett Buyback Shows S&P 500 May Be Bargain (Bloomberg) see also Record Dividends Lure Morgan Stanley to Asia as Stocks Drop (Businessweek)
• Error of Margin in Precious Metal Theories (WSJ)
• SEC Eyes Ratings From S&P (WSJ) see also S.&P. Target of Inquiry in Securities (NYT)
• Obama’s Economic Quagmire: Ron Suskind’s Revealing New Book About the White House (NY Mag)
• Freddie Mac Loan Deal Defective, Report Says (NYT) see also Freddie Faulted on Mortgage Reviews (WSJ)
• On Wednesday, Amazon Will Unveil The “Kindle Fire” (Tech Crunch)

What are you reading?

>

Rumours of ECB rate cuts and liquidity measures next week is helping markets

Email this post Print this post
By Kiron Sarkar - September 27th, 2011, 8:30AM

S&P warns that Chinese developers face an “increasingly severe” credit outlook, forcing them to cut sales prices and to seek higher cost funding reports Bloomberg. S&P adds that the worst is not over as yet as developers brace themselves for lower prices and slower sales. Those developers who are exposed to short term debt will find refinancing difficult e.g. Greentown China. The majority of developers reported that cash flows worsened in August. S&P cut the outlook for Chinese property developers to negative, from stable in June;

A number of people still accept and rely on Chinese official economic data. Look, I will keep this simple. China NEVER revises its data unlike everyone else, including DM’s – indeed, the revisions to data from DM’s can be significant. As a result, Chinese data cannot be accurate;

In spite of rampant speculation, Hong Kong’s Financial Secretary John Tsang stated that the US$ peg would be maintained and, in addition, predicted a “soft landing” for the Hong Kong property sector. Its more hope than expectation, I suspect;

The new Thai PM, Ms Yingluck Shinawatra’s policy to raise the minimum wage is causing a major problem for Thai businesses, who are lobbying to have it changed. They claim that exports will suffer. However, it looks as if the Government will go ahead with its plans, which it also sees as essential to stimulate domestic demand, though also because of the composition of its voters – mainly the less well off rural population in the North of the country;

In spite of a slowing economy, India’s Central Bank governor reported that inflation remained above acceptable rates, suggesting that the tighter monetary conditions are unlikely to be eased, as was expected – personally, I expect one more 25bps hike. However, if growth declines below 8.0% (as is likely), analysts expect the RBI to be more cautious. Wholesale price inflation rose to 9.78% in August (the highest of the BRIC’s) and the weaker Rupee (now nearly 50 to the US$) will make the inflation numbers worse. The SENSEX is down approx 20%
YTD;

The French Socialist party are set to take control of the Senate (the 1st time in 53 years), following yesterdays elections, creating yet another problem for President Sarkozy ahead of the May 2012 Presidential elections. Whilst the Senate is relatively unimportant, it can delay the passage of legislation;

France has no plans to recapitalise its banks as the lenders are “solid”. Well the French are at it again. Denial continues to be the strategy. However, the French Budget Minister refused to confirm whether a meeting took place on 11th Sept, where it is alleged that plans to recapitalise 5 French banks were discussed. The problem that the French Government has is that if it goes ahead and recapitalises French banks (as is so desperately needed) it will, almost certainly, lose its AAA credit rating. However and totally amazingly, equity markets responded positively yesterday to the story that French banks did not need more capital;

Read the rest of this entry »

Rally Improves Backdrop Somewhat

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - September 27th, 2011, 7:30AM

>

Following last weeks fugly sell off, traders were hoping for signs of a bottom. 90% down days — like the one we saw last week, with 90% of the volume and 90% of the stocks are both to the downside — can lead to a tradeable low, if not a firm bottom (heh heh).

Yesterday’s not unexpected face-ripper was of comfort to the bulls. The advance yesterday was stronger than Friday’s modest bounce. We would have preferred more insitutional endorsement; note that volume at 5.2 billion shares was well below the 7 billion shares traded on Thursday’s 90% Down Day.

The rally was broad based, but according to Lowry’s technical services, not quite a 90% up day (NY Up Volume was about 87% of total versus Friday’s Up/Down Volume of 69%. That’s a bit surprising in light of the strong price action, anyway.

Lowry describes this as a typical “rebound rally” that follows 90% Down Days.

The Quarter ends Friday, and its worth noting that the next few days may have an element of window dressing to them.

Weeks of talk now finally leading to action?

Email this post Print this post
By Peter Boockvar - September 27th, 2011, 7:21AM

The path to stability in Europe seems pretty straightforward, delever, restructure and grow. This can be achieved in part with a Greek default and using the EFSF to act like a super TARP to plug holes but the political process of getting there has been and will continue to be the issue. On July 21st, the EU said the EFSF will take on new functions and hopefully in the next few weeks all 17 Parliament’s will agree to it. Enlarging and leveraging the EFSF past this has been discussed for weeks and the politics around doing it still remain tough as German and Spanish officials shot down using the EFSF above and beyond its current plan. On a Greek bankruptcy, the Austrian Finance Minister still reiterates their opposition but that’s a losing battle at this point. Greece today votes on the property tax plan in order to satisfy the next payment of money to them and Papandreou meets with Merkel. With respect to the markets, if there is one thing that occurred over the weekend when EU/IMF/ECB officials got together and saw what happened to markets last week, particularly with the bank funding squeeze, is that it may finally have created a sense of urgency where time of decision making and clarity is now of the essence. We know all the things that have been discussed for weeks on dealing with the debt crisis but its time now for action

Last Days to Register for Big Picture Conference!

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - September 27th, 2011, 7:08AM

There is a week left to get your tickets for the Big Picture Conference at the discounted rate — Register today!

You can see the full line up by clicking here.

Group discounts are available for parties of 6 or more. Current students and faculty with .EDU email addresses also qualify. Contact us by sending an email to TBPConf@gmail.com. Be sure to let us know how many are in your party for groups. Current students please send from your campus email.

The Daily Show: Ron Paul Extended Interview

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - September 27th, 2011, 6:21AM

Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul believes his political message is a threat to the establishment and his campaign is on the verge of an explosion of interest.

(04:55)

~~~

Extended Interview Pt. 2
Ron Paul believes the war on drugs is a violation of Americans’ civil liberties and trusts that people can make their own choices without government regulation.

(05:39)

~~~

Ron Paul Extended Interview Pt. 3
Ron Paul believes the environment should be protected by property rights instead of federal laws and that government authority should exist only at a state level.

(06:53)

Can Countries Default On Their Debts?

Email this post Print this post
By Washingtons Blog - September 27th, 2011, 1:30AM

Countries Routinely Default

Many people – including economists – are are confused about whether or not countries can default.

One of the world’s leading economic historians – Harvard professor Niall Ferguson – says:

The economists are ill qualified to analyse the current economic situation since they lack the overview of historians such as himself.

“There are economic professors in American universities who think they are masters of the universe, but they don’t have any historical knowledge. I have never believed that markets are self correcting. No historian could.”

“The idea that countries don’t go bust is a joke…

Ferguson notes:

Habsburg Spain defaulted on all or part of its debt 14 times between 1557 and 1696 and also succumbed to inflation due to a surfeit of New World silver. Prerevolutionary France was spending 62 percent of royal revenue on debt service by 1788. The Ottoman Empire went the same way: interest payments and amortization rose from 15 percent of the budget in 1860 to 50 percent in 1875. And don’t forget the last great English-speaking empire. By the interwar years, interest payments were consuming 44 percent of the British budget, making it intensely difficult to rearm in the face of a new German threat.

In fact, as the IMF’s Eduardo Borensztein and Ugo Panizza have shown, countries default all of the time.

Here are 3 charts based on IMF data courtesy of Calculated Risk:

SIGSovereignDefaults1920 Can Countries Default On Their Debts?  Can Countries Default On Their Debts? SIGSovereignDefaults2003 Can Countries Default On Their Debts?

American states have also defaulted. As the Wall Street Journal noted in January:

Land values soared. States splurged on new programs. Then it all went bust, bringing down banks and state governments with them. This wasn’t America in 2011, it was America in 1841, when a now-forgotten depression pushed eight states and a desolate territory called Florida into the unthinkable: They defaulted on debts.

But America Can’t Default … Can It?

Mainstream American economists argue that – because we have world’s reserve currency – America can never default. Specifically, they say we can always print up more money to pay our creditors.

This may technically be true, although the dollar’s status as reserve currency is slipping away.

But with every new dollar we print, each existing dollar becomes worth less. And our creditor, China, has said that America has defaulted by printing too many dollars. For example:

A Chinese ratings house has accused the United States of defaulting on its massive debt, state media said Friday, a day after Beijing urged Washington to put its fiscal house in order.

“In our opinion, the United States has already been defaulting,” Guan Jianzhong, president of Dagong Global Credit Rating Co. Ltd., the only Chinese agency that gives sovereign ratings, was quoted by the Global Times saying.

Washington had already defaulted on its loans by allowing the dollar to weaken against other currencies – eroding the wealth of creditors including China, Guan said.

It is printing massive numbers of dollars which has caused the dollar to weaken against other currencies.

So while America may not technically default, it may default in practice, by printing so many dollars that creditors don’t want to lend, except for a very steep price.

How Did We Get Here?

How did Greece, Iceland and other countries get to the point of default?

BIS (the “Central Banks’ Central Bank”) said in 2008 that said that the massive bailouts are putting nations at risk.

Spiegel wrote in 2009:

Unlike 1929, the world’s major countries are flooding the economy with money to prevent deflation and, with it, a downward spiral of declining prices and income.

But no one knows whether this will suffice, or whether all the money being thrown at the aggressive virus fueling this crisis will only make it worse. Debts are being fought with debts, meaning that not only banks but entire countries could end up bankrupt. Perhaps the efforts to combat the current crisis are merely laying the foundations for the next crisis, which will be bigger still.

That is what is happening today.

Of course, if the governments had chosen the little guy instead of the giant banks, the consumer would have more resources and confidence, small businesses would be hiring, economies would stabilize, and governments would as well. By choosing the big banks over the little guy, the governments have doomed both.

Measuring Your Way to Success

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - September 26th, 2011, 7:30PM
Measuring our way to future success
View more presentations from Helge Tennø

TBP’s 30 Most Influential Finance Sources

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - September 26th, 2011, 5:00PM

Last week, I lamented that the Bloomberg 50 was a disappointingly obvious list (the event was quite good, however).

Following that (Meh!) complaint, I asked readers who was their most influential managers, thinkers, traders and strategists — who impacted their trading, thinking and investment process more than the rest of the chattering classes.

For obvious reasons, I excluded myself & TBP (the sample group of TBP is biased).

Well, you responded in force. Almost 500 votes were submitted for 90+ people. The list ranged far and wide, with many nominees. I thought it was more intriguing than the Business Week piece, with far less sell side names and far more interesting, thoughtful suggestions. Kudos to TBP readers for your intriguing perspectives.

This is the list you, the home viewer, came up with:

Asset Managers

Researcher/Strategists

Media/Blogs

1. Jeremy Grantham James Grant Naked Capitalism
2. Jim Rogers Robert Shiller John Mauldin
3. John Hussman Lakshman Achuthan Paul Krugman
4. George Soros Marc Faber ZeroHedge.com
5. Hugh Hendry David Rosenberg Calculated Risk
6. Bill Gross Chris Whalen Jesse’s Café Américain
7. Felix Zulauf Gary Shilling Mish
8. Seth Klarman James Montier Peter Brandt
9. Bill Fleckenstein Louise Yamada Robert Prechter
10. Howard Marks Nouriel Roubini FT Alphaville

Read It Here First: MS Earnings Concerns

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - September 26th, 2011, 3:30PM

Morgan Stanley Research channels our prior discussion on earnings during recessions:

“We have heard investors suggest $80 in EPS was a fair bear case for 2012. We decided to look at history as a guide in assessing the bear case EPS. The 2001 recession saw a 13% revenue decline and a 57% EPS drawdown. The 2008 recession saw a 14% revenue decline and a 51% EPS hit, peak-to-trough. For 2012, bottom-up estimates (excluding financials) embed a 5% revenue INCREASE and just over 10% year-over-year EPS growth. If prior recessions prove relevant to next year’s economy, $54 to $68 in EPS in 2012 would be a more likely range than the $112 that the bottom-up consensus estimates currently embed.”

What should SPX prices be? Depends upon how much earnings fall during the coming slow down/recession. If we get a pre-2000 recession drop of 15%, then we are priced fairly. A 2001-recession like drop of 25% means more downside. Of course, the 2008 outlier — earnings plummeted 44% during the credit crisis  — well, that means a whole lot more downside work in equities . . .

>

Hat tip Sam Ro

Previously:
The investor’s dilemma: Earnings, valuations and what to do next (September 11th, 2011)

Is the S&P500 Cheap? (August 29th, 2011)

McKinsey: Equity Analysts Are Still Too Bullish (June 2nd, 2010)

44 queries. 1.037 seconds.