Americans Are Protesting for the Same Reasons Arabs Are Protesting: Corruption, Unemployment and Rising Food Prices
October 3, 2011


Corruption, Soaring Food Prices and Unemployment

As I documented in February, soaring food prices, corruption and youth unemployment are leading causes of the “Arab Spring” of unrest in the Middle East.

And I’ve repeatedly pointed out that it is a global – not Arab – revolution:

The worldwide riots are not mysterious or unforeseeable. They’ve been predicted for years, and are a direct result of the bad policy choices made by most nations worldwide.


Nations around the world decided to bail out their big banks instead of taking the necessary steps to stabilize their economies …. As such, they all transferred massive debts (from fraudulent and stupid gambling activities) from the balance sheets of the banks to the balance sheets of the country.

The nations have then run their printing presses nonstop in an effort to inflate their way out of their debt crises, even though that effort is doomed to failure from the get-go.

Quantitative easing by the Federal Reserve is obviously causing food prices to skyrocket worldwide (and see this, this and this).

But the fact is that every country in the world that can print money … has been printing massive quantities of money.


Moreover, the austerity measures which governments worldwide are imposing to try to plug their gaping deficits (created by throwing trillions at their banks) are causing people world-wide to push back.

As I warned in February 2009 and again in December of that year:

Numerous high-level officials and experts warn that the economic crisis could lead to unrest world-wide – even in developed countries ….

Unemployment is soaring globally – especially among youth.

And the sense of outrage at the injustice of the rich getting richer while the poor get poorer is also a growing global trend.

Countries worldwide told their people that bailout out the giant banks was necessary to save the economy. But they haven’t delivered, and the “Main Streets” of the world have suffered.

As former American senator (and consummate insider) Chris Dodd said in 2008:

If it turns out that [the banks] are hoarding, you’ll have a revolution on your hands. People will be so livid and furious that their tax money is going to line their pockets instead of doing the right thing. There will be hell to pay.

Of course, the big banks are hoarding, and refusing to lend to Main Street. In fact, they admitted back in 2008 that they would. And the same is playing out globally.

In March, Council of Foreign Relations research associate Matthew Klein noted the parallels between soaring youth unemployment in corrupt Arab countries and the U.S.:

We all enjoy speculating about which Arab regime will be toppled next, but maybe we should be looking closer to home. High unemployment? Check. Out-of-touch elites? Check. Frustrated young people? As a 24-year-old American, I can testify that this rich democracy has plenty of those too.

About one-fourth of Egyptian workers under 25 are unemployed, a statistic that is often cited as a reason for the revolution there. In the United States, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported in January an official unemployment rate of 21 percent for workers ages 16 to 24.


The true unemployment rate for young graduates is most likely even higher because it fails to account for those who went to graduate school in an attempt to ride out the economic storm or fled the country to teach English overseas. It would be higher still if it accounted for all of those young graduates who have given up looking for full-time work, and are working part time for lack of any alternative.


The uprisings in the Middle East and North Africa are a warning for the developed world. Even if an Egyptian-style revolution breaking out in a rich democracy is unthinkable, it is easy to recognize the frustration of a generation that lacks opportunity. Indeed, the “desperate generation” in Portugal got tens of thousands of people to participate in nationwide protests on March 12. How much longer until the rest of the rich world follows their lead?

Richard Wilner noted in 2009 that less than half of 16-24 year old Americans had jobs:

The number of young Americans without a job has exploded to 53.4 percent — a post-World War II high, according to the Labor Dept. — meaning millions of Americans are staring at the likelihood that their lifetime earning potential will be diminished and, combined with the predicted slow economic recovery, their transition into productive members of society could be put on hold for an extended period of time.

The number represents the flip-side to the Labor Dept.’s report that the employment rate of 16-to-24 year olds has eroded to 46.6 percent — the lowest ratio of working young Americans in that age group, including all but those in the military, since WWII.

And as I noted last year, some groups in America are experiencing Depression-level unemployment:

34.5% of young African American men were unemployed in October 2009.

As the Center for Immigration Studies noted last December:

Unemployment rates for less-educated and younger workers:

  • As of the third quarter of 2009, the overall unemployment rate for native-born Americans is 9.5 percent; the U-6 measure shows it as 15.9 percent.
  • The unemployment rate for natives with a high school degree or less is 13.1 percent. Their U-6 measure is 21.9 percent.
  • The unemployment rate for natives with less than a high school education is 20.5 percent. Their U-6 measure is 32.4 percent.
  • The unemployment rate for young native-born Americans (18-29) who have only a high school education is 19 percent. Their U-6 measure is 31.2 percent.
  • The unemployment rate for native-born blacks with less than a high school education is 28.8 percent. Their U-6 measure is 42.2 percent.
  • The unemployment rate for young native-born blacks (18-29) with only a high school education is 27.1 percent. Their U-6 measure is 39.8 percent.
  • The unemployment rate for native-born Hispanics with less than a high school education is 23.2 percent. Their U-6 measure is 35.6 percent. blank Americans Are Protesting for the Same Reasons Arabs Are Protesting: Corruption, Unemployment and Rising Food Prices
  • The unemployment rate for young native-born Hispanics (18-29) with only a high school degree is 20.9 percent. Their U-6 measure is 33.9 percent.

No wonder Chris Tilly – director of the Institute for Research on Labor and Employment at UCLA –

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

that African-Americans and high school dropouts are experiencing depression-level unemployment.

And as I have previously noted, unemployment for those who earn $150,000 or more is only 3%, while unemployment for the poor is 31%.

And food prices are soaring in the U.S. As CNN noted last month:

According to the latest government figures, the consumer price index for food at home increased by 60 basis points year-over-year to 6% versus the 10 basis point gain in food away from home CPI inflation to 2.7%.

Food inflation is now the most important household expense, according to Wal-Mart’s (WMT) commentary during its earnings call last month. Food prices, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, continue to accelerate higher.

(And inequality in America is worse than Egypt, Tunisia, Yemen or most Latin American banana republics).

No wonder protesters are saying that “Spring” has spread to America:

413556726 Americans Are Protesting for the Same Reasons Arabs Are Protesting: Corruption, Unemployment and Rising Food Prices

(And see this).

Not Just Wall Street … Corrupt Government Is At Least Half the Problem

Because government policy is ensuring high unemployment, it is not surprising that the American protesters are angry at the Federal Reserve and other government institutions, and not just the big Wall Street banks.

Remember, Bush and Obama’s economic policies are virtually indistinguishable. Indeed, Obama actually likes high unemployment.

And as I noted in 2009, the government created the giant banks:

As MIT economics professor and former IMF chief economist Simon Johnson points out today, the official White House position is that:

(1) The government created the mega-giants, and they are not the product of free market competition

(2) The White House needs to “regulate and oversee them”, even though it is clear that the government has no real plans to regulate or oversee the banking behemoths

(3) Giant banks are good for the economy

Of course, the government has also made it policy to cover up fraud and protect the fraudsters, and so the free market has no chance to punish fraud or cleanse wrongdoing from the system.

Without government-created moral hazard emboldening casino-style speculation, corruption of government officials, creation of a system of government-sponsored rating agencies which had at its core a model of bribery, and other government-induced distortions of the free market, things wouldn’t have gotten nearly so bad.

Indeed, the government is so corrupt that the head of the economics department at George Mason University says that D.C. politicians are worse than prostitutes … they are “pimps”, since they are pimping out the American people to the financial giants.

And while co-option of government by the big banks is a huge problem, it is also true that corruption in government leads to corruption in the private sector. See this and this. The U.S. has truly become a banana republic, just like the worst Latin American countries.

So anyone who thinks that government would solve all of our problems if it were only freed from obstructionists is only seeing half the problem, and is falling for the oldest trick in the book … the ole’ divide and conquer strategy.

Category: Think Tank

Please use the comments to demonstrate your own ignorance, unfamiliarity with empirical data and lack of respect for scientific knowledge. Be sure to create straw men and argue against things I have neither said nor implied. If you could repeat previously discredited memes or steer the conversation into irrelevant, off topic discussions, it would be appreciated. Lastly, kindly forgo all civility in your discourse . . . you are, after all, anonymous.

8 Responses to “American Spring: Corruption, Unemployment and Rising Food Prices”

  1. peachin says:

    picture this:

    A Poster:

    Wanted Dead or Alive (to be drag through the streets behind two tandem Harley Davidson’s)
    LLoyd Blankfein – A Big Picture – ( Why do you suppose he hired a lawyer more than a month ago)

    Actually, he exemplifies the look of Greed –

    Probably there are 5,000 or more people directly involved in the profit scam from Wall Street – who moved around very bad (should never have been made – even obvious at the time) Mortgages – packaged them – spent money (payoffs to congress) to have certain regulations removed against them so their ability to leverage their funds were increased many fold. Yes 5000+ should be being picked up and moved to jail a good % of their wealth confiscated for the cost and return.

    American Spring, Indeed – How about – “The American Winter”

    Yes, Lloyd Balnkfein – The Poster Boy of the Movement.

    AND – Lets declare War Against Switzerland and tear apart their banks with forensic Auditors – Afterall
    Switzerland was complicit in the movement illegal funds and untaxed income) – they are now laughing in their boardrooms – Can you imagine threatening these old rich men in Switzerland – wearing diapers as American Troops Land – collecting these funds and distributing the funds back to the country of origan to assist in their rebuilding their own futures.

    - got to go have breakfast now…. later

  2. ilsm says:

    Wall st owns the government………………

  3. number2son says:

    In the 1980′s I was in the same situation as many of the kids we are hearing from in NYC. I was a student, dirt poor, no healthcare, no savings and I didn’t even know from a 401k. A new wife and a baby. We barely made ends meet. We lived had to mouth in Ed Koch’s NYC and I still remember his infamous declaration that anyone making <$40K shouldn't be there. What an asshole he was. And still is.

    The big difference between then and now was that I had hope that I could do better. And I eventually did.

    The young people today have lost that hope. For good reason. And shame on the rest of us for letting this happen.

  4. bmz says:

    Blaming food inflation on quantitative easing is the Republicon argument. The truth is that ethanol subsidies–which are supported by the Republicons–have a greater impact.

  5. Blissex says:

    What is relevant in first-world economies is how floating voters are doing, voters whose swings can carry states.

    This in first-world economies means mostly middle class middle aged women, which are still doing pretty well, and have opened a widening wage and employment gap in their favour (statistics that some propagandists mention showing that women make less than men are completely wrong because they don’t correct for age/studies and experience, what they show is that overall younger women workers make almost as much as older male workers).

    The power of middle/older aged middle/upper class voters in first-world economy elections is very high, because on “women” issues they swing easily and vote as blocks, and they are often campaign donors.

    The Republicans do whatever they want in economic matters (Bushcare Part D was aimed at them, as middle/older aged women voters consume a much larger part of OAS+DI+Medicare than men as they live significantly longer and contribute significantly less), and the Democrats do whatever they want in political matters (heavy handed criminal laws, big discrimination in their favour).

    Also in large part the asset prices bubbles of the past few decades were also designed to benefit them, as older/richer women own a lot of property (shares, real estate) thanks to either divorce settlements (80% initiated by women) and women outliving their husbands.

    That’s what happens when a block of voters swings and is critical to elections on their issues. In the 1940-1980 golden era for labor it was irish/jewish/italian working class men, currently it is middle/older aged middle/upper class women.

    BTW even working class women are a powerful voting block and what is their attitude to politics and those less fortunate than them is pretty clear from this article in the English “The Times”:

    «The C2 women who voted Conservative last time did so because they, in low to middling-paid roles such as nurses, secretaries and carers, believed welfare had grown too generous, that benefits rewarded the do-nothings while they toiled. They hoped the Tories would crack down.
    Now, they are shocked to discover the Government regards them as part of the problem. They work in the “bloated public sector”, their meagre pensions are grotesquely lavish, their often tough vocational jobs are regarded as worthless and dispensable. Labour celebrated “hard-working families”; the Tories tell them it was their salaries – not the bankers’ excesses – that broke the economy.

  6. Blissex says:

    «What is relevant in first-world economies is how floating voters are doing, voters whose swings can carry states.»

    In other words, that «young Americans without a job has exploded to 53.4 percent» and «34.5% of young African American men were unemployed» is largely irrelevant because those two categories don’t cary elections, because they don’t much vote, if they vote they are faithful to their party, are not driven by single issues as a single voting blocks, and almost never donate to campaigns.

    Actually high youth unemployment may be regarded as beneficial by those middle/older aged and more prosperous (mostly female) voters because it largely implies lower wages for low end service workers, which benefits those voters, especially those on largely fixed incomes.

  7. theexpertisin says:

    And the answer is?

    Higher taxes, more government control, class warfare, another more sinister set of leaders.

    Got it.

    Or, are people conditioned nowadays to expect something for nothing?

  8. HarleyHoward says:

    Don’t be fooled. This is just a distraction. The political entrenched elites (Dick Durbin, among others) spent trillions of our (we the people) money to bail out the financial entrenched elites (the banks), so they both can continue to rob and plunder our country. This is just a planned side show distraction to try and stay in power. We the people must vote out all the Entrenched Elites (both Republican and Democrat) before they destroy our once great country. Common Sense from the Heartland –

    Yes, this is a recording, WAKE UP!