Astronomers Find Earth-Size Worlds

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - December 21st, 2011, 8:00AM

>

Very cool scientific achievement in  the search for habitable worlds: Scientists have discovered several planets of similar size to the earth orbiting a sun-like star:

>

Using NASA’s Kepler space telescope, astronomers discovered two Earth-size planets orbiting a distant star–the smallest of all the thousands of alien worlds detected so far, Lee Hotz reports on the News Hub. Photo: NASA.

>
Source:
Astronomers Spot Distant Earth-Size Planets
ROBERT LEE HOTZ
WSJ, DECEMBER 21, 2011
online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204791104577110562687967308.html

Billionaire Buffoons Hoisted On Their Own Petards

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - December 21st, 2011, 7:00AM

I want to direct your attention to a fascinating piece of journalistic theater:  Bankers Join Billionaires to Debunk ‘Imbecile’ Attack on Top 1%. It was the most popular piece on Bloomberg.com yesterday.

After reading the full piece, you may conclude that the quote in the headline was misplaced; it should have been around the word “Debunk” and not imbecile.

Indeed, that was the first a clue that something interesting was afoot. The author is Max Abelson, formerly of the New York Observer — that was your 2nd clue. At the Observer, Abelson’s vicious wit, leavened with a sarcastic streak, was on full display. Outside of opinion pieces, the machinery at the Bloomberg factory tends to squeeze away anything that is not the 5 Ws: Just the facts, gives us the data, leave the commentary to the opinion pages.

However, those familiar with Max Abelson’s prior work can squint and see the embedded sarcasm and wit hidden in the text. But in the Billionaires piece, it is not hidden at all — it practically leaps off of the page. Abelson somehow managed to talk several billionaires into making asses of themselves in public. Their sincerity is both palpable and amusing; to say they are out of touch is to be generous in your criticism.

The column is an exercise in meta-journalism: Each billionaire quote is followed by a specific fact that makes their protestations laughable. The level of contextual sarcasm is in the plain words themselves. I wonder how many people read this yesterday and completely missed the snark . . .

One-percenters who “debunk” the 99%

• “Acting like everyone who’s been successful is bad and because you’re rich you’re bad, I don’t understand it” -JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon. (2010 compensation: $23 million).

• “If successful businesspeople don’t go public to share their stories and talk about their troubles, they deserve what they’re going to get. Who gives a crap about some imbecile? Are you kidding me?” -Home Depot Inc. (HD) co-founder Bernard Marcus (billionaire)

• “Instead of an attack on the 1 percent, let’s call it an attack on the very productive. This attack is destructive . . . It still feels lonely, but the chorus is definitely increased.”  -John A. Allison IV, a director of BB&T Corp.

• “If I hear a politician use the term ‘paying your fair share’ one more time, I’m going to vomit.”  -Tom Golisano, founder of Paychex (billionaire)

• “I am a fat cat, I’m not ashamed. If you mean by fat cat that I’ve succeeded, yeah, then I’m a fat cat. I stand guilty of being a fat cat.” -Ken Langone, Home Depot co-founder (billionaire)

• “My taxes are more than a medieval lord would have taken from a serf”  -Peter Schiff, CEO Pacific Capital (net worth $64.7 million)

• “Capitalists are not the scourge that they are too often made out to be . . . wealthy aren’t a monolithic, selfish and unfeeling lot . . . [they] fill store shelves at Christmas, provide health care to millions.”  -Leon Cooperman, hedge-fund manager of Omega (Cooperman can “barely get through the dining room of St. Andrews Country Club in Boca Raton Advisors without being thanked” by fellow 1%-ers).

To put that into some context, Abelson used paragraphs such as this:

The top 1 percent of taxpayers in the U.S. made at least $343,927 in 2009, the last year data is available, according to the Internal Revenue Service. While average household income increased 62 percent from 1979 through 2007, the top 1 percent’s more than tripled, an October Congressional Budget Office report showed. As a result, the U.S. had greater income inequality in 2007 than China or Iran, according to the Central Intelligence Agency’s World Factbook.

Nicely done, Max, hilarious stuff. Good luck getting these folks to talk to you in the future.

>

See also:
Dear Jamie Dimon, We Don’t Hate The Rich, We Hate You (Josh Brown, Reformed Broker)

Source:
Bankers Join Billionaires to Debunk ‘Imbecile’ Attack on Top 1%
Max Abelson
Bloomberg, Dec 20, 2011  
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-12-20/bankers-join-billionaires-to-debunk-imbecile-attack-on-top-1-.html

Ritholtz Says `Santa Claus’ Rally to Fade

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - December 21st, 2011, 6:00AM

Barry Ritholtz, chief executive officer at FusionIQ, talks about the U.S. financial industry, the gold market and the outlook for stocks and housing. He speaks with Tom Keene on Bloomberg Television’s “Surveillance Midday.”


Source: Dec. 20 (Bloomberg)

ECB re 3 year LTRO

Email this post Print this post
By Kiron Sarkar - December 21st, 2011, 5:40AM

Apologies for being off line – far too many Christmas parties.

All eyes on the ECB’s 3 year LTRO auction today. Personally, I believe the take up by banks will be large, which, I believe, will be bullish (potentiall seriously bullish) for markets.

Just 1 example, why not obtain cheap (1.0% money) from the ECB, with a chance of the ECB lending rate declining even further, in exchange for your “toilet paper” collateral. The borrowed funds could be used by you to buy back/retire outstanding debt, which is trading at a discount, thereby providing an instant realised gain, an improvement in your core tier 1 ratio and lower interest costs in the future. Furthermore, European banks can repay the borrowed money in a year, if they wish. As a result, accessing the ECB’s 3 year LTRO is a no brainer in my view. In addition, European banks have significant debt funding requirements next year – analysts suggest over E750bn.

The ECB is encouraging banks to utilise this facility. The “stigma” issue will be superced by the ULTRA CHEAP ECB FINANCING.

Will banks borrow from the ECB to buy Euro Zone Sovereign debt is the other big question. Personally, I do not believe that LARGE and INTERNATIONAL banks will play this game in any meaningful way, as they will be concerned about adverse analyst/investor reaction, given that they have to disclose their holdings of Sovereign debt on a Q’rly basis. However, SMALLER banks and, quite frankly, banks that are in trouble will play this game, as I suspect they will work on the basis that they have no choice.

Most of you disagree with me about my view of impending QE in the Euro Zone. I continue to believe that it WILL HAPPEN. Indeed, the ECB’s financing of banks could be deemed QE, to the extent that the funds are not deposited with the ECB.

First the ECB is going to find it harder and harder to sterilise its existing bond purchases, let alone additional amounts bought under the SMP programme. Indeed, on a number of occasions to date, the ECB has  not succeeded in fully sterilising bond purchases – this problem will become a bigger and bigger issue.

Second, the ECB’s mandate is to keep inflation “below, but around 2.0%”. Euro Zone Inflation, will decline sharply, in 2012 (likely starting end of 1st Q) – base effects make this a certainty and, in addition, the global slowdown will also have an effect. In those circumstances, the ECB can justify QE on the basis it is fulfilling its mandate. In addition, there may also be some kind of “fiscal compact” in place at that time, which will provide further ammunition for the ECB.

I remind you that German representatives, the only serious opponents to QE, comprise just 2 members out of a total of 23 ECB voting members.

Watch the financials today – both banks and insurers. If I’m right, I expect them to out perform significantly. The ECB announces the level of take up at 10.15 am UK time, I believe.

Banks Got Bailed Out … We Got Sold Out

Email this post Print this post
By Washingtons Blog - December 21st, 2011, 1:30AM

Democrats: Here’s How to Force President Obama to Debate Endless War, Indefinite Detention, SOPA and Other Assaults on Our Freedom, and the Out-of-Control Federal Reserve

We voted for Obama because we wanted change.

We voted for Obama because he promised to end Bush’s perpetual wars, clean up the mess which Bush’s financial tzars made, and restore the freedom and liberty which Bush attacked.

Instead, Obama:

  • Has appointed the very Wall Street insiders who helped cause the financial crisis to top posts. See this, this, this and this.

As I pointed out in September, Americans overwhelmingly want:

  • The Federal Reserve to be reined in if not abolished
  • The never-ending, open-ended, goalpost-moving wars to stop and the troops to be brought home
  • Our liberties to be restored, and the martial law indefinite detention idiocy to be reversed

As I pointed out in October:

Obama – just like the other pimps in D.C. – has institutionalized fraud as an official (if unspoken) party platform.

Americans want our liberties restored, our troops brought home, and the Fed reined in. But Obama has implemented plans for war throughout the Middle East crafted by the Neoconservatives a decade (or more) ago, and gotten us into 7 (oops …8) wars, attacked our liberties even more than Bush and allowed the Fed to dramatically expand its powers.

Americans didn’t want bailouts, but Obama helped to facilitate trillions in direct and hidden bailouts.

Obama doesn’t support the 99%. He is a wolf in sheep’s clothing.

And as I wrote last month, Obama was heckled by Occupy protesters for allowing police brutality and mass arrests of the peaceful protesters, and because:

Banks got bailed out. We got sold out.

Forget Partisan Politics: Demand a Real Debate

Read the rest of this entry »

Catastrophic Success

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - December 20th, 2011, 10:00PM

Catastrophic Success
John Mauldin
December 20, 2011

~~~

New readers to my musings often find it interesting, when they meet me in person, to find me quite an optimistic person, given the nature of my current predictions about the economy. And regarding the short term, defined as less than five years, my writing is admittedly less than sanguine. We do have some problems that are not easily dealt with. And even longer-term, those of a bearish natural disposition can find reasons a-plenty to tone it down.

But five years (at least at my age) is not all that long. One way or another we will get through the current mess. My studies on the nature of progress in a number of fields give me a rather optimistic longer-term slant on life, and most especially in biotechnology. Long-time readers know of my interest in the potential for biotechnology to be completely transformational and disruptive (in a positive way) to society. It is one of the few places I am “long” and willing to get even more long.

Today’s Outside the Box is from a source that is no stranger to my regular readers. Pat Cox called last week and told me about an amazing announcement that was made public last Friday, so we are almost “breaking news” here this week. BioTime (BTX) has announced the ability to detect most cancers with a simple blood test that detects markers. This holds the prospect that within a very few years we will all routinely get a blood test for cancer as part of our regular blood work, allowing for very early detection. And as Pat notes, cancer becomes far more treatable if detected early.

As Pat and I talked, I asked him to give us an update on the BioTime story but also on the state of some of the really promising cancer cures. And let me note, these are but a few. There are literally dozens, if not hundreds, of real potential cures. We do live in remarkable times. Comments in the text below in brackets [ ] are mine.

Pat is one of my favorite sources for new, transformational technology. We talk regularly and compare notes. Pat (like me) likes to look over the horizon and think about what is coming. The companies he writes about are typically early-stage research and development plays, in a variety of fields (not just biotech – last month he was writing about robotics!).

You can subscribe to his letter by going to http://www.PatCoxLetter. Warning: his publisher likes rather aggressive marketing, but I just like his letter and research.

Note: I have invested (for quite some time now) in some of the companies he mentions below or have associations with them that I note in the copy. And some I have no knowledge of.) I have not done any transactions in the last few months and will not do anything for at least two weeks. And do NOT chase these stocks. They are typically very small-cap with smaller volumes, and are research and development companies with no guarantees of success. Do your homework, and if you buy then do it for the long term.

I do comment below on one private firm that some of you who sit on foundations and charities that focus on cancer and heath care might want to look into.

Now let’s take a look at what Pat and I sincerely hope is the future.

Your planning to live a lot longer than you think analyst,

John Mauldin, Editor
Outside the Box

JohnMauldin@2000wave.com

Catastrophic Success

By Pat Cox, Editor
Breakthrough Technology Alert

When the second stimulus bill passed in February, 2009, I explained to my readers that the “crowding out effect” would guarantee its failure. I took no pleasure in predicting accurately that increased government borrowing would crowd out private investment in innovation, from which flows economic and employment growth.

I bring this up simply because I have extraordinarily good news regarding cancer therapeutics, and I don’t want you to assume that I am afflicted with blind optimism. For decades, in fact, I’ve been among the economists who have warned that our current distress was coming. As you know, we were ignored by the intelligentsia. As a result, the entirely avoidable mortgage and housing bubbles expanded and collapsed, which accelerated our even larger problem – the entitlements crisis.

Political corruption and malfeasance were involved, we now know. I suspect, however, that the larger reason the warnings signs were ignored was essentially psychological. Most people avoid extremely unpleasant news until they no longer have a choice.

This is particularly true with regards to the entitlement crisis because it involves perhaps the greatest unpleasantness of all. It is the reality that we are all facing the prospect of aging, serious illness, and death – in that order.

The aging population, however, is the root cause of our financial problems. More than a third of the federal budget goes to transfer payments and services for people age 65 or older. Nevertheless, we’re behind on the payments and the bill is increasing as more and more people live longer.

This is the result, primarily, of unexpected scientific breakthroughs that have dramatically expanded our medical options. Unfortunately, Social Security was designed in 1935, when fewer lived to see the retirement age of 65. Only a fringe of visionaries believed that new technologies would push life spans close to 80 by the end of the century.

Nevertheless, it has happened. Retirement ages, though, have not adjusted, so Social Security is running on empty. Medicare may not have been designed to benefit the aged, but about half of all healthcare services are consumed by the five percent of the population that is dying. They are, it’s no wonder, almost all older people.

These worsening fundamentals have not plateaued. The demographic pyramid, with large numbers of young payers and very few aged beneficiaries, is flipping. I’m sorry to be the bearer of bad news, but I hope at least to convince you that I’m not in denial about the problems we face. Therefore, I hope you’ll take me seriously when I say that very recent scientific breakthroughs are more than capable of solving our entitlement and debt crises.

Read the rest of this entry »

There’s No Reason to Own a Bank: 3 Reasons to Avoid

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - December 20th, 2011, 9:00PM

“There’s No Reason to Own a Bank”: Barry Ritholtz’s 3 Reasons to Avoid Today’s Hot Sector

Source: Yahoo Finance

Crisis Correlations (Big Picture Conference)

Email this post Print this post
By Marion Maneker - December 20th, 2011, 7:15PM

All of The Big Picture Conference videos are now available on Fora.tv

Watch all of the Big Picture Conference for $39.95 or choose just the speakers you want to see on FORA.tv

James Bianco: Crisis Correlations

Email this post Print this post
By Marion Maneker - December 20th, 2011, 7:15PM

With No Debt Growth, Is a Double-Dip Recession Looming? from The Big Picture Conference on FORA.tv

The Big Picture Conference on Fora.tv

10 Tuesday PM Reads

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - December 20th, 2011, 4:30PM

My afternoon train reading:

• 99% plan new tax war on Super Rich in 2012 (Market Watch)
• Philip Mirowski: The Seekers, or How Mainstream Economists Have Defended Their Discipline Since 2008 – Part I (Naked Capitalism)
• Multifamily Construction Drives Housing Starts Jump (WSJ)
• How Freedom Became Tyranny (George Monbiot)
• A boom in shale gas? Credit the feds (Washington Post)
• Jefferson County revisited (Self-Evident)
Nathan Myhrvold: Invention Is the Mother of Economic Growth (Bloomberg)
• The Gervais Principle (Ribbon Farm)
• A man, a ball, a hoop, a bench (and an alleged thread)… TELLER! (Las Vegas Weekly)
• Captured: The Pacific and Adjacent Theaters in WWII (Denver Post)

What are you reading?

47 queries. 1.026 seconds.