My Sunday Washington Post Business Section column is out. This morning, we look at a regular slice of silliness this time of year, the Folly of Forecasts. The print version had the full headline Your short guide to getting ahead of forecaster folly for 2012 while the online version is merely Investing in 2012: Get ahead of forecaster folly.
This is a favorite subject of mine, having penned The Folly of Forecasting for TSCM so very long ago. This morning in WaPo, I revisit the subject. Instead of making forecasts about what I expect to happen in 2012, I forecast what the forecasters will be forecasting for 2012.
Here’s an excerpt from the column:
“Because of this folly of forecasting, I try not to make many predictions. Whenever I am asked where the economy is going, who is going to win that year’s elections or what the markets are going to do, I steal a trick from the weatherman: Always couch your forecasts in probabilities. That way, when I am wrong — and anyone who pretends to know what will happen in the future will frequently be wrong — at least I can declare the outcome was an anticipated probability.
“As we stated last January, there was a 10 percent chance that the Federal Reserve’s Hobbensobbers were going to be trounced by the bond market’s Rebblesacks — and that’s exactly what happened!”
It’s a great cheat to avoid saying silly things in public that could come back to haunt you.
These are my 10 forecasts as to what the forecasters will be forecasting for 2012:.”
The Post did a nice job in the dead tree version — the layout and art work are cute:
click for ginormous version of print edition
Source: Jan 1 2012 print edition
Your short guide to getting ahead of forecaster folly for 2012
Washington Post, January 1 2012
Category: Apprenticed Investor
Please use the comments to demonstrate your own ignorance, unfamiliarity with empirical data and lack of respect for scientific knowledge. Be sure to create straw men and argue against things I have neither said nor implied. If you could repeat previously discredited memes or steer the conversation into irrelevant, off topic discussions, it would be appreciated. Lastly, kindly forgo all civility in your discourse . . . you are, after all, anonymous.