Fukushima Cover Up Unravels: Too Much Radiation to Cover Up

Email this post Print this post
By Washingtons Blog - January 23rd, 2012, 8:00PM

“The Government Can No Longer Pull the Wool Over the Public’s Eyes”

As I’ve pointed out since day one, the Japanese government and Tepco have covered up the extent of the radiation released by Fukushima and its health effects on the Japanese and others. See this and this.

The New York Times notes:

The government inspectors declared Onami’s rice safe for consumption after testing just two of its 154 rice farms.

Then … more than a dozen [farmers] found unsafe levels of cesium. An ensuing panic forced the Japanese government to intervene, with promises to test more than 25,000 rice farms in eastern Fukushima Prefecture, where the plant is located.

***

The repeated failures have done more than raise concerns that some Japanese may have been exposed to unsafe levels of radiation in their food, as regrettable as that is. They have also had a corrosive effect on public confidence in the food-monitoring efforts, with a growing segment of the public and even many experts coming to believe that officials have understated or even covered up the true extent of the public health risk in order to limit both the economic damage and the size of potential compensation payments.

Critics say … the government can no longer pull the wool over the public’s eyes, as they contend it has done routinely in the past.

“Since the accident, the government has tried to continue its business-as-usual approach of understating the severity of the accident and insisting that it knows best,” said Mitsuhiro Fukao, an economics professor at Keio University in Tokyo who has written about the loss of trust in government. “But the people are learning from the blogs, Twitter and Facebook that the government’s food-monitoring system is simply not credible.”

***

“No one trusts the national government’s safety standards,” said Ichio Muto, 59, who farms organic mushrooms in Nihonmatsu, 25 miles northwest of the Fukushima Daiichi plant.

The Japan Times reports:

The government buried a worst-case scenario for the Fukushima nuclear crisis that was drafted last March and kept it under wraps until the end of last year, sources in the administration said Saturday.

After the document was shown to a small, select group of senior government officials at the prime minister’s office in late March, the administration of then Prime Minister Naoto Kan decided to quietly bury it, the sources said.

“When the document was presented (in March), a discussion ensued about keeping its existence secret,” a government source said.

In order to deny its existence, the government treated it as a personal document of Japan Atomic Energy Commission Chairman Shunsuke Kondo, who authored it, until the end of December, the sources said.

It was only then that it was actually recognized as an official government document, they said.

“The content was so shocking that we decided to treat it as if it didn’t exist,” a senior government official said.

Major Japanese broadcaster NHK purportedly stopped a reporter in mid-sentence on March 12th as he was discussing the exposure of the nuclear fuel rods above the cooling pool, telling him:

They say you mustn’t read this draft.

Finally, the Economist and Boing Boing note that a Canadian journalist was grilled about who he spoke with at Fukushima, and:

Held, threatened, and shaken down for bribes before being detained without counsel or a phone call. He says he was eventually deported, though not before being ordered to sign a falsified confession and being threatened by an official at gunpoint.

(Many journalists and nuclear experts are alleged to have been monitored, harassed or blocked by the Japanese government.)

Comments

Please use the comments to demonstrate your own ignorance, unfamiliarity with empirical data, ability to repeat discredited memes, and lack of respect for scientific knowledge. Also, be sure to create straw men and argue against things I have neither said nor even implied. Any irrelevancies you can mention will also be appreciated. Lastly, kindly forgo all civility in your discourse . . . you are, after all, anonymous.

4 Responses to “Fukushima Cover Up Unravels: Too Much Radiation to Cover Up”

  1. ReductiMat Says:

    Is this all a test to see what it would take for a first world country to go all French Revolution on their government?

    I gotta say I’d have already been taken to the cleaners for what has gone on thus far. Habeas, trillions of $, nuclear fallout… but at least we won SOPA. Right? Right?

  2. MrPeabody Says:

    The story is consistent with my experience in the Fukushima case. There has been little more than complete denial of the multiple problems that originated with the Tsunami and subsequent multiple meltdowns. The Japanese government from the top down has been trying to avoid a massive loss of face over this and in the end, when more of the truth comes out they’ll have 1) a bigger more expensive mess to clean up because the delay didn’t help other than giving the Iodine-131 time to decay, 2) a lot more sick people due to the chronic exposure and spread of radioisotopes, and 3) some new people in the government after the current ones are shamed out of office.

  3. theexpertisin Says:

    When all is said and done, the Japanese people will go along to get along. That’s been their history.

    They’re still in denial about Imperial Japan 1934-45.

  4. The cover up keeps getting bigger « Neil Hartmann Weblog Says:

    [...] and thought provoking article here, I love this quote from the [...]

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

52 queries. 0.391 seconds.