Barron’s Says Dow 15,000

Email this post Print this post
By James Bianco - February 16th, 2012, 8:30AM

Barron’s – Cover Story: Enter the Bull
Even by conservative measures, the Dow Jones Industrials could top 15,000 in two years. Dow 17,000 is a 50-50 bet
tarting at the close of each calendar year, the returns assume all publicly traded stocks are purchased on a capitalization-weighted basis, with all dividends reinvested. Yearly percentage returns are equal to the average annual compound rate. Total returns over recent years have not benefited as much from reinvested dividends. While payouts have picked up since the cut in the dividend tax in 2003, the yield on the S&P 500 is still well below its average in the post-World War II years. As recently as the period from 1990-95, the yield was rapidly declining, but still averaged 3%, compared with a little over 2% today. In the 1980s, the dividend yield averaged 4.2%; in the ’50s, 4.9%. But there has been an offsetting factor. As Jeremy Schwartz points out, “Firms have been substituting share buybacks for dividends at a greater rate over the last 20 years than through much of history.” Stock buybacks contribute to total returns by putting upward pressure on stock prices. With cash that might otherwise go to dividends spent instead on buying back stock, the long-term effect on returns from cash infusions might be even over time.

Comment

Barron’s doesn’t promote numbers much on their covers, and with good reason.  These types of specific forecasts often come back to embarrass them.

Recall the last time they promoted a number on a cover last summer.  The story was even written by the same author as this week’s cover story.

So how did that cover work out?

A few weeks after the last Barron’s cover with a number, prices violently moved in the other direction.  This is not an isolated incident for this author, as the blog the Big Picture detailed last year.

The Financial Times - The bulls return, but for how long?
It is almost as if the past year has just been a bad dream. Global equities this week re-entered a bull market, having risen 20 per cent since their October lows. The gains mean that many share indices are within touching distance of their highs from 2011, or above them. The Nasdaq index of predominantly technology stocks is at its highest level since the end of 2000. Justifications for the sharp rally are well rehearsed. Better economic data, particularly in the US but also in Europe and China, has, for now, dimmed the prospects of a global double-dip recession. And fears of a break-up of the eurozone have receded due to action from the European Central Bank. But the question all investors are asking is: just how sustainable is the rise in equities?

Source: Bianco Research

Comments

Please use the comments to demonstrate your own ignorance, unfamiliarity with empirical data, ability to repeat discredited memes, and lack of respect for scientific knowledge. Also, be sure to create straw men and argue against things I have neither said nor even implied. Any irrelevancies you can mention will also be appreciated. Lastly, kindly forgo all civility in your discourse . . . you are, after all, anonymous.

4 Responses to “Barron’s Says Dow 15,000”

  1. dougc Says:

    Barrons story has a couple of caveats; if Europe solves its problem and the US economy continues to grow. I might add; the Middle East doesn’t explode and China has a soft landing. If If If

  2. jpm Says:

    The magazine cover indicator sez: Sell! http://farm1.static.flickr.com/8/7265064_e30fd4083b_o.gif

  3. machinehead Says:

    If you have an investment allocation (whether static or dynamic) and follow it, then when it comes to future returns, ‘what will be, will be.’ There is no need to predict the future. Just follow your allocation discipline, accept that volatility will cause returns to fluctuate, and collect your gains over time.

    Predicting the future is a game for noobs, amateurs, touts, shills and publicity hounds. Barron’s puts crap like ‘Dow 15,000′ on the cover, because that’s what it takes to peddle subscriptions to the non-professional sector who crave entertainment, advice and forecasts.

    But the price of pitching for the cheap seats is that you lose the pros. I haven’t read Barron’s or any other Lamestream Media publication for years. Sensationalist garbage like Barron’s ‘Dow 15,000′ cover is all I need to know, to conclude that this publication is no longer for me.

  4. VennData Says:

    No one knows, Jim Bianco’s calls included.

    But a casual statement regarding the dividend tax cuts is typical nonsense that spews out of his pie hole…

    http://www.cbpp.org/cms/?fa=view&id=472
    http://www.economics.harvard.edu/files/faculty/1238_dividends_aea.pdf
    http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/feds/2010/201034/201034pap.pdf

53 queries. 0.324 seconds.