Facebook IPO by the Numbers

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - February 2nd, 2012, 11:00AM

From Statista via Mashable: (some of those Statista numbers are wrong. Facebook 2011 revenue was $3.7B, not $4.2. ad revenue $3.2B, not $3.8B)

>

click for the rest of the graphic

>
full graphic after the jump

>
click for larger graphic

Comments

Please use the comments to demonstrate your own ignorance, unfamiliarity with empirical data, ability to repeat discredited memes, and lack of respect for scientific knowledge. Also, be sure to create straw men and argue against things I have neither said nor even implied. Any irrelevancies you can mention will also be appreciated. Lastly, kindly forgo all civility in your discourse . . . you are, after all, anonymous.

3 Responses to “Facebook IPO by the Numbers”

  1. dsimmons Says:

    Numbers like Results Per Active User (and ARPU and ARPPU) have always been rather useless. McDonalds knows about it’s heavy users and Zynga especially knows about them ( http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/zyngas-quest-for-bigspending-whales-07072011.html ). They are called whales because they bring a big amount of money compared to the minnows. While we may see $5.34 of 2011 revenue per active user, that is really just total/active. Total user rate, total churn rate, total growth rate is fine and all, but I would rather see stratified data. Even, two or three groups would be 10x more helpful.

  2. Lee_in_DC Says:

    Google makes about $200 per user per year. Except it’s not users who directly pay to search but the FIRE and big pharma industries who pay big bucks for the AdWords / AdSense clickthroughs.

    How much are pizza chains willing to fork over to Facebook to access their core college crowd?

  3. sandyyadav Says:

    The size of the IPO seems to be the double size of Srilanka’s economy ..don’t know why the IT company so hyped again as if the dot com bubble is in formation http://sandyyadav.com/

51 queries. 0.298 seconds.