Click to enlarge:

The Financial Times – Obama pressed to open emergency oil stocks

The Obama administration is coming under growing pressure to cool petrol prices by releasing emergency stocks of oil. However, critics say this would be the wrong response to the wrong problem at the wrong time. The oil price surge has increased speculation that the US and its allies could repeat the co-ordinated release of crude stockpiles they undertook last summer to compensate for lost supply from Libya. The move led to an 8 per cent price fall. On Friday, Timothy Geithner, US Treasury secretary, said there was “a case” for releasing crude from the US strategic petroleum reserve, or SPR, “in some circumstances” – a significant shift for an administration that had previously ruled out another release. What has triggered the change is the steady drumbeat of soaring petrol prices, with the US national average now $3.68 a gallon – a record February high. “Nothing terrifies a sitting president more than rising gasoline prices, which in President Obama’s case could imperil the economic recovery and torpedo his re-election prospects,” said Robert McNally, head of the Rapidan Group energy consultancy and a former White House official.


The chart above shows the SPR’s inventory level, highlighting the last four SPR sales.

Regarding the highlighted part above about last year’s release, see the chart below.  The last announcement of an SPR release occurred on June 24, 2011 encompassing a release of 60 million barrels globally, 30 million of which came from the U.S. SPR.

Overlaid on the SPR inventory levels is the price of nearby WTI futures.  WTI closed at $91.16 the day of the announcement.  It rose to $97.60 the week the release began (July 15, 2011) and dropped to $88.18 the week the release ended (September 16).  This is a drop of 3% from the announcement to the end of the release.  It is a drop of 8% to 10% during the release.

The U.S. consumes 19 million barrels of crude oil a day, so a 30 million barrel release is roughly 50 hours of consumption spread out over 30 days.  The world consumes 80 million barrels of crude oil a day, so a 60 million worldwide release is 18 hours of consumption spread out over 30 days.  We will leave it the reader to decide if the SPR release made a difference.

When gas prices rise, politicians are helpless to do anything over the short-term.  This is especially troublesome for politicians when an election is less than a year away.  SPR releases are ineffective at altering the price.  They do, however, give politicians cover to take credit for any down-tick or argue any up-tick would have been worse without the release.

Therefore, we expect an announcement of SPR release in the next several weeks.  We expect it to be met with plenty of fanfare and arguments that it will matter.  We expect it will again amount to hours of consumption and not make a difference.  Administration officials will disagree.

The Telegraph (UK) – Soaring oil prices will dwarf the Greek drama

Since last week’s eurozone “grand summit”, the headlines have been positive and, in the official photos anyway, the main players appear to be smiling. As such, the global equity rally goes on
Behind the rictus grins, though, the gloves remain off, the rhetorical daggers still drawn. Having launched the biggest sovereign debt restructuring in history, Athens now faces the Herculean task of persuading holders of Greek bonds to accept a “voluntary” hair-cut. Creditors are being asked to swap their bonds for a combination of new short-term instruments, issued by the European Financial Stability Facility, and longer-term Greek government debt. If half of them agree to take the hit then, under “collective action clauses” approved by the Greek parliament, the deal could be forced on all bond-holders. This is a default in all but name, then, with “the powers that be” desperate to hold the single currency together while not triggering credit default swap (CDS) insurance policies that could themselves spark a whole new wave of financial panic. The reported bond-holder loss will be 53.5pc – a headline number largely for the consumption of furious taxpayers in those eurozone nations that remain notionally solvent. In reality, payment durations and coupons will be tweaked, once the media has moved on, to ensure bondholders suffer less. To be sure, though, there is still significant loss embedded in this deal, which is why the CDS switch could ultimately be flicked. That remains the case even if tame ratings agencies confirm their ludicrous “judgement” that an imposed €200bn (£170bn) debt-swap doesn’t amount to a “credit event”.

All charts courtesy of Bianco Research

Category: Consumer Spending, Energy

Please use the comments to demonstrate your own ignorance, unfamiliarity with empirical data and lack of respect for scientific knowledge. Be sure to create straw men and argue against things I have neither said nor implied. If you could repeat previously discredited memes or steer the conversation into irrelevant, off topic discussions, it would be appreciated. Lastly, kindly forgo all civility in your discourse . . . you are, after all, anonymous.

8 Responses to “The Strategic Petroleum Reserve and Oil Prices”

  1. Quite a pickle the pols have got themselves in. We warned about unintended consequences of sabre-rattling with Iran weeks ago:

  2. Woof says:

    Wonder what the SPR expressed in terms of the relevant consumption measure is? Looks like about one month of average consumption currently and closer to two months worth back in early 80′s?

  3. yon ‘Addict’,

    with..”…Quite a pickle the pols have got themselves in…”

    Do you, really, think that ‘the pols’, personally, care about the ‘Price’ of Gasoline? (the vast majority of them are ‘filling up’ with a “Card”–fueled by a Hose that reaches into your ‘back Pocket’..)

    and/or, Do you, really, believe that those, saidsame, ‘pols’ are interested, at all, in your Welfare?

  4. rd says:

    Releasing the Strategic Oil Reserve oil onto the London and Chicago Merc trading floors would be the fastest way to bring down prices.

    This price rise smells of speculation funded by central banks.

  5. wally says:

    The election is too far away; I wouldn’t look for something like this until mid summer.

  6. biglot says:

    Say, has anybody given any thought to cutting out the middlemen, the speculators, ETF’s, hedge funds? Exxon’s Rex Tillerson says these guys are adding on $40/bbl.

  7. victor says:

    The SPR will come in very handy if and when a major source of crude is cut-off such as Iran or as the case was with Libya. The recent rise in the price of crude is mainly attributable to the anticipation that the Iran issue may cause a major disruption in oil supply. Speculation? of course, there is plenty of it! On the way up but down as well, contract by contract, two sides of the bet.

  8. romerjt says:

    Since every problem is an opportunity and if I had enough $$$ to be in the investor class I would certainly by oil future contracts and then hope that, even encourage if I could, the rhetoric about Iran to heat up. Every time I heard someone talk about bombing Iran I’d see dollar signs. Me and all the state-owned oil “companies”, including Iran, would make a killing . . too bad about the American consumer, too bad about the American economy, perhaps they need another lecture about the wonders of capitalism and a market economy.

    And another advantage . . considering the weakness of the Rep candidates, maybe this is the best tool to get rid of Obama.