Click to enlarge: – U.S. Consumer Sentiment Climbs Toward ’08 Levels
Consumer-confidence measures are climbing out of the depths reached during the last recession as employers step up hiring and stocks rally, signaling Americans may be poised to increase spending. The Conference Board’s gauge in February increased to the highest level in a year, figures from the New York-based research group showed today. The Bloomberg Consumer Comfort Index rose to an almost four-year high in the week through Feb. 19, and the Thomson Reuters/University of Michigan measure of consumer sentiment increased to 75.3 in February, the sixth straight monthly gain and the longest advance since 1997. The last time the University of Michigan index stayed above 75 for more than two months was in the period through January 2008, a month after the end of the previous expansion. Consumers are likely to grow more optimistic as the two-year recovery boosts employment and incomes further, said Dean Maki, chief U.S. economist at Barclays Capital Inc. in New York. “The major driver of the improvement in confidence has been the labor market,” Maki said. “We would expect consumer confidence to continue trending higher if the labor market continues to improve as we expect.” Employers have added 1 million workers to payrolls since July, according to Labor Department data. During that same period, the unemployment rate dropped by 0.8 percentage point, the biggest decline since 1984. The rate was 8.3 percent in January, the lowest in almost three years.


We have called consumer confidence the world’s most useless economic statistic.  The economists that construct or track consumer confidence disagree.  They insist it follows labor conditions and gives us a good indicator of what is happening to the jobs market.

The next chart shows consumer confidence and the total number of non-farm payroll jobs.   At first glance it looks like these two indicators seem to have a relationship.

For the record, the conference board index is calculated by asking consumers a series of five questions:

1. Appraisal of current business conditions
2. Expectations regarding business six months hence
3. Appraisal of current employment conditions
4. Expectations regarding employment conditions six months hence
5. Expectations regarding total family income six months hence

Respondents answer either positive, neutral, or negative to each question, and an index is then calculated according to the responses of all five questions.

If the overall consumer confidence measure is supposed to tell us about the labor market, then perhaps a closer look at the employment conditions sub-component is in order.  This is shown below.

To be perfectly honest, neither the overall consumer confidence index nor the employment conditions index track the number of non-farm jobs all that well.

Stocks And Confidence

So what is consumer confidence really measuring?  As the chart below shows, the stock market provides a much better fit to consumer confidence than the number of non-farm jobs.

Why do these two measures track each other so closely?  See the questions that are asked again (remember the answers are positive, neutral or negative):

1. Appraisal of current business conditions
2. Expectations regarding business six months hence
3. Appraisal of current employment conditions
4. Expectations regarding employment conditions six months hence
5. Expectations regarding total family income six months hence

To most Americans these questions are too abstract.  It is like asking them, “what is the weather in the United States and what do you expect the weather of the United States to be?”  How does one answer this?  You would probably look out the window and describe what you see.

The consumer confidence questions are being answered in a similar manner.  Respondents don’t really know how to answer such abstract questions as business and employment conditions, so they describe what they think is the ultimate economic indicator, the stock market’s recent movements.  While spikes in gas prices or other economic events (i.e., 9/11, “The Great Recession”) will supersede this method at times, most of the time the stock market is used to formulate answers to the above questions.  In the last few months the stock market is up strongly, so it should not be a surprise that consumer confidence is up as well.

Since we do not need an indicator to highlight recent stock market performance, the Consumer Confidence Index becomes rather useless as an economic indicator.  If it measures nothing more than recent stock market performance, economists should not be puzzled by the lack of a relationship between something like retail sales and consumer confidence.  Consumer confidence and retail sales no longer relate.

Source: Bianco Research)

Category: Economy, Psychology, Think Tank

Please use the comments to demonstrate your own ignorance, unfamiliarity with empirical data and lack of respect for scientific knowledge. Be sure to create straw men and argue against things I have neither said nor implied. If you could repeat previously discredited memes or steer the conversation into irrelevant, off topic discussions, it would be appreciated. Lastly, kindly forgo all civility in your discourse . . . you are, after all, anonymous.

8 Responses to “Consumer Confidence, The World’s Most Useless Economic Statistic”

  1. Thx for your info., James…much appreciated!

  2. mwf says:

    Although the end conclusion may be correct, the supporting analysis by Bianco is really weak. In every case his primary y-axis data, which Jim tries to correlate to his secondary y-axis data, needs to be adjusted to be propertly comparable. This could be easily done by using a period over period comparison, year over year perhaps. The results may be the same but at least it would then be grounded in a more solid analysis, instead of what’s provided.

  3. Low Budget Dave says:

    Consumer confidence seems to over-react to changes in employment, but under-reacts to changes in the stock market. Because general measures of confidence also indicate people’s willingness to spend and invest, it can be used as a “summary” measure that provides a sense of scale that the S&P fails to account for. Not great, but not useless either.

    A national mood-ring can still be a good thing. The problem is that it is placed on the wrong part of the body. The economy used to be driven by the whims of the middle class, because the middle class was so wealthy and so large that they could generate (or end) a boom just by investing their “spare” money. Those days are gone.

    The middle class has been impoverished by endless wars, tax cuts for billionaires, and other get-rich-quick schemes. If you want a real economic indicator, you really only need to poll the members of Congress and the various state legislatures. If they fear for the future of capitalism, they will try to boost the economy through more tax cuts and deregulation; and you can rest assured the economy will tank. If they all seem confident that capitalism will survive the occasional minimum-wage law, for example, then go ahead and invest.

    In the State of Florida, they are trying to do away with the minimum wage law for waiters and waitresses. I assume to keep TGI Friday’s from sending jobs overseas. Anyone who thinks this will boost the economy is nitwit, yet we have a whole state legislature full of them.

  4. Julia Chestnut says:

    Fascinating. And yet, most “consumers” have no real attachment to the stock market, and it doesn’t really even track underlying business conditions any more.

    Besides, even if it did track labor, what kind of lead would you be getting on the actual labor statistic with something like “confidence?”

    Agreed – utterly useless, and used in a feedback-loop of stupid to try and increase “confidence.” Confidence only matters if this is all a big confidence game . . . . .hey, wait a minute –

  5. adid says:

    Still, in 2011, Consumer Confidence as measured by Gallup broke down before the SPX. I noticed this to be the case at some other important past turning points.

  6. phisqb says:

    It would be interesting to see the charts mapped against some visualization of positive and negative commentary in the media regarding the economy. Wouldn’t surprise me to see a pretty high correlation. Because most of the media knows how to analyze the stock market…riiiiiiggggghhhhhttttttt.

  7. [...] Consumer confidence is pretty much a “useless as an economic indicator.”  (James Bianco) [...]

  8. [...] Stanley still expects another round of easing. Consumer borrowing increases. James Bianco says consumer confidence is the world’s most useless statistic: “The conference board index is calculated by asking [...]