Household Services Expenditures: An Update
November 26, 2012
This post updates and extends my July 2011 blog piece on household discretionary services expenditures. I examine the most recent data to see what they reveal about the depth of decline in expenditures in the last recession and the extent of the recovery, and find that the expenditures appear to be further below the peak identified earlier. I then compare the pace of recovery for discretionary and nondiscretionary services in this expansion with that of previous expansions, finding that the pace in both cases is well below that of previous cycles. In summary, household spending continues to be constrained by a combination of credit conditions and weak income expectations.
Depth of Decline
The chart below updates a similar chart from my previous post showing the extent of the decline in real per capita discretionary services expenditures from the previous peak. (A zero value in this chart and the following chart indicates that expenditures were above their previous peak.) The differences between this chart and the prior one result from two factors: the release of data for additional quarters; and the revisions of previously released data.
When we compare this chart with the companion chart in the prior post, a couple of points are evident. First, the decline in expenditures was much more severe in the 2007-09 recession than in the 2001 downturn; moreover, the maximum decline of nearly 9 percent is considerably greater than the estimated maximum decline using the data from early July 2011. Second, five years after their peak, expenditures are still about 6.5 percent down (which is roughly similar to the estimate of the maximum decline reported in my previous post).
Offering another comparison, the next chart presents the decline from the previous peak for the other portion of services expenditures, which I label “nondiscretionary” services expenditures. (See my prior post for a definition of discretionary versus nondiscretionary expenditures.) As seen in the chart, the fall in these expenditures in the past recession was much less than the drop in discretionary services. In addition, while the maximum decline in nondiscretionary services expenditures is large compared with previous declines, it’s not unprecedentedly large, and these expenditures are above their prerecession levels, even though they have declined modestly in the second and third quarters of this year. These patterns indicate that, consistent with the notions behind these labels, households responded to the severe income declines of the recession by cutting back on spending on discretionary services and by trying to maintain spending on nondiscretionary services.
Pace of Recovery
I now examine the pace of recovery for discretionary services spending so far in this expansion. To do so, I again update a chart from my prior post (showing an index of real per capita discretionary services expenditures that equals 100 in the quarter at the end of a recession), which allows for a comparison of this recovery with “fast” recoveries (the average of those following the 1973-75 and 1981-82 recessions) and “slow” recoveries (the average of those following the 1980, 1990-91, and 2001 recessions). The chart below reveals that the pace of recovery in the current cycle is still well behind that of previous cycles. As of 2012:Q3, more than three years after the end of the last recession, discretionary expenditures were only 1.6 percent above their level at the recession’s trough (and there has been little change over the past year). In contrast, at this point in the average slow recovery, these expenditures were 6.1 percent above the level at the recessions’ trough; in the average fast recovery, they were 12.6 percent above their low point—and were also displaying steady, solid increases at this stage of the cycle.
Performing a similar exercise for nondiscretionary services, I show that these expenditures also have been sluggish in this expansion relative to previous expansions, even though they didn’t fall that much during the last recession (see chart below). The level of these expenditures in 2012:Q3 was 1.5 percent above the level at the last recession’s trough, compared with 5.4 percent for the average slow recovery and 10.2 percent for the average fast recovery at the same stage of the cycle.
The pattern of a similarly sluggish pace of recovery for discretionary and nondiscretionary services expenditures suggests that the fundamentals for consumer spending remain soft. In particular, it appears that households—more than three years after the end of the recession—remain wary about their future income growth and employment prospects even though consumer confidence measures have improved in recent months. In addition, households may still see the need to repair their balance sheets from the damage incurred during the recession, especially if they expect that increases in asset prices will be subdued at best and that credit will continue to be constrained. Consequently, a positive resolution of these issues is likely necessary before a stronger services and overall consumer spending recovery can be sustained.
The views expressed in this post are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or the Federal Reserve System. Any errors or omissions are the responsibility of the authors.
Category: Think Tank
Please use the comments to demonstrate your own ignorance, unfamiliarity with empirical data and lack of respect for scientific knowledge. Be sure to create straw men and argue against things I have neither said nor implied. If you could repeat previously discredited memes or steer the conversation into irrelevant, off topic discussions, it would be appreciated. Lastly, kindly forgo all civility in your discourse . . . you are, after all, anonymous.