More Spying On Citizens than in Stasi East Germany

TechDirt notes:

In a radio interview, Wall Street Journal reporter Julia Angwin (who’s been one of the best at covering the surveillance state in the US) made a simple observation that puts much of this into context: the US surveillance regime has more data on the average American than the Stasi ever did on East Germans.

Indeed, the American government has more information on the average American than Stalin had on Russians, Hitler had on German citizens, or any other government has ever had on its people.

The American government is collecting and storing virtually every phone call, purchases, email,  text message, internet searches, social media communications, health information,  employment history, travel and student records, and virtually all other information of every American.

Some also claim that the government is also using facial recognition software and surveillance cameras to track where everyone is going.  Moreover, cell towers track where your phone is at any moment, and the major cell carriers, including Verizon and AT&T, responded to at least 1.3 million law enforcement requests for cell phone locations and other data in 2011. And – given that your smartphone routinely sends your location information back to Apple or Google – it would be child’s play for the government to track your location that way.

As the top spy chief at the U.S. National Security Agency explained this week, the American government is collecting some 100 billion 1,000-character emails per day, and 20 trillion communications of all types per year.

He says that the government has collected all of the communications of congressional leaders, generals and everyone else in the U.S. for the last 10 years.

He further explains that he set up the NSA’s system so that all of the information would automatically be encrypted, so that the government had to obtain a search warrant based upon probably cause before a particular suspect’s communications could be decrypted.  But the NSA now collects all data in an unencrypted form, so that no probable cause is needed to view any citizen’s information.  He says that it is actually cheaper and easier to store the data in an encrypted format: so the government’s current system is being done for political – not practical – purposes.

He says that if anyone gets on the government’s “enemies list”, then the stored information will be used to target them. Specifically, he notes that if the government decides it doesn’t like someone, it analyzes all of the data it has collected on that person and his or her associates over the last 10 years to build a case against him.

As we’ve previously documented, the spying isn’t being done to keep us safe … but to crush dissent and to smear people who uncover unflattering this about the government … and to help the too big to fail businesses compete against smaller businesses (and here).

And as we point out at every opportunity, this is not some “post-9/11 reality”.  Spying on Americans – and most of the other attacks on liberty – started before 9/11.

Senator Frank Church – who chaired the famous “Church Committee” into the unlawful FBI Cointel program, and who chaired the Senate Foreign Relations Committee – said in 1975:

Th[e National Security Agency's]  capability at any time could be turned around on the American people, and no American would have any privacy left, such is the capability to monitor everything: telephone conversations, telegrams, it doesn’t matter. There would be no place to hide.  [If a dictator ever took over, the N.S.A.] could enable it to impose total tyranny ….

We can debate whether or not dictators are running Washington. But one thing is clear: the capacity is already here.

TechDirt points out:

While the Stasi likely wanted more info and would have loved to have been able to tap into a digitally connected world like we have today, that just wasn’t possible.

That’s true.  The tyrants in Nazi Germany, Stalinist Russia and Stasi Eastern Europe would have liked to easedrop on every communication and every transaction of every citizen.  But in the world before the internet, smart phones, electronic medical records and digital credit card transactions, much of what happened behind closed doors remained private.

(And modern tin pot dictators don’t have the tens of billions of dollars necessary to set up a sophisticated electronic spying system).

In modern America, a much higher percentage of your communications and transactions are being recorded and stored by the government.

 

Source: Washington Blogs

Category: Think Tank

Please use the comments to demonstrate your own ignorance, unfamiliarity with empirical data and lack of respect for scientific knowledge. Be sure to create straw men and argue against things I have neither said nor implied. If you could repeat previously discredited memes or steer the conversation into irrelevant, off topic discussions, it would be appreciated. Lastly, kindly forgo all civility in your discourse . . . you are, after all, anonymous.

8 Responses to “Americans Are The Most Spied On People In World History”

  1. Fred C Dobbs says:

    Swell. We have to give up our constitutional rights to privacy, guns and other civil liberties just to keep a bunch of dummies fully-employed on the Fed payroll protected by union bosses busy trying to stop a few lunatic muslims from massacring a bunch of Americans.

  2. Moopheus says:

    All of this is more or less true, though this doesn’t necessarily make us the most spied upon. After all, we can assume that other governments do all these things, at least to the extent that they have the capacity to do so. And some countries go further with some techniques. For instance, much more of Britain, especially in the cities, is under police video surveillance. Government security cameras are ubiquitous.

  3. dougc says:

    I would give my opinion on this subject but that would put me on the NSA dissident list. Oop, I have already said too much. Found it interesting that the congressional investigation into possible criminality between countrywide and members of congress couldn’t find any prosecutable offenses; seem that the statute of limitations prevents it. Could that of been the object of the investigation in the first place?

  4. rodgerleanne says:

    Therefore, the safest way to convey messages is by way of cursive writing and snail mail. Hmmm, is deleting teaching cursive writing in schools part of the spying strategy?

  5. CitizenWhy says:

    Isn’t there a point where too much data is like having no data? That is, the too much is impossible to process in any meaningful way? Isn’t this a problem our spy agencies are facing? And don’t CIA “analysts” often have to look beyond their own data gathering to the news, the internet, etc. to find out what is really happening? With too much data can you possible use a pproces of elimination to arraive at the best truth available?

  6. oldbluejeans says:

    Well rodgerleanne, it is possible this is one gigantic plot to save the US Post Office! Ha ha. Like other comments I’d say more, but I don’t want to offend anyone that might be listening or watching.

  7. Jack says:

    Hey Washington’s Blog, guess what? We don’t give a rat’s patoot.

    Sincerely yours,

    The 150 million (give or take a couple million) US Facebook users plus Twitterers plus Google++ or whatever else is going on “social media-wise”.

  8. JackWayne says:

    “[If a dictator ever took over, the N.S.A.] could enable it to impose total tyranny ….”

    But in the disconnected world of BR, you shouldn’t be allowed to own a gun. Unless of course, you are finger-printed and have approval from the authorities…..