- The Big Picture - http://www.ritholtz.com/blog -

Kill the “fiscal cliff” instead of the Economy

Posted By Guest Author On December 26, 2012 @ 8:30 am In Think Tank | Comments Disabled

Kill the “fiscal cliff” instead of the Economy
William K. Black
New Economic Perspectives [1]

 

 

 

Everyone now agrees that the so-called “fiscal cliff” is a stupid policy that threatens our economy and our people.  Everyone agrees why the “fiscal cliff” is stupid – it inflicts austerity at a time when it is likely to throw the nation into a gratuitous recession.  Causing a recession leads to increased unemployment and a larger budget deficit.  We have all seen austerity force the Eurozone into a gratuitous recession in which Italy, Spain, and Greece have Great Depression levels of unemployment.

Here’s the short version of why austerity is a self-destructive response to the Great Recession.  A recession occurs when demand to purchase goods and services falls and the economy contracts, causing increased unemployment.  This simultaneously causes tax revenues to fall and government expenditures for programs like unemployment compensation to increase.  The fall in revenues and increase in expenses causes the federal budget deficit to grow rapidly.

Austerity is a policy of raising taxes and/or cutting governmental spending for the purported purpose of cutting the deficit.  If one raises overall taxes in response to the Great Recession the result is a reduction in private sector demand.  If one cuts governmental spending the result is a reduction in public sector demand.  The result of reducing private and public sector demand in the recovery phase from the Great Recession, where overall demand is already grossly inadequate, is to throw the nation back into recession or even a depression.  That causes the budget deficit to grow.  A policy of austerity undertaken under the claim that it will reduce the deficit causes a gratuitous recession that leads to a massive loss of wealth, far higher unemployment, and in increased deficit.  That is why austerity is a policy that is the self-destructive economic analogy to the medical insanity of bleeding patients.

We have known that austerity is an idiotic response to a severe crisis for 75 years.  The U.S. was in the midst of a strong recovery from the Great Depression until FDR’s neo-liberal economists convinced [2] him in 1937 that is was essential that the U.S. adopt an austerity program to reduce the federal deficit.  Austerity forced our economy back into a Great Depression.

It was only the stimulus of federal spending in World War II that brought the U.S. out of the depression.  During World War II and for the remainder of that decade the ratio of debt-to-GDP was at or near historically record levels.  The result was the greatest industrial expansion in history, full employment (including a massive influx of women), strong economic growth, and sharply declining deficits and debt-to-GDP ratio because the growth led to large increases in revenue and the low unemployment greatly reduced spending on the unemployed.  We also defeated the Axis powers, created Social Security and the GI Bill, and began an extraordinary expansion of our housing stock to house the baby boom.

We learned many lessons from the catastrophic failure of austerity and the extraordinary success of stimulus in this era.  The U.S. adopted a fiscal system of “automatic stabilizers.”  These are counter-cyclical (they push in the opposite direction of the business cycle) fiscal effects that are designed into the system and do not require new legislation once the recession or inflation begins.  The result of these automatic stabilizers has been to reduce the severity and duration of recessions.  Indeed, studies show [3] that the larger the national governmental role in the economy, the less volatile the economy.  This makes sense because the stabilization function should be more effective if the stabilizers are larger relative to the economy.

Unfortunately, these sensible counter-cyclical policies that make theoretical and common sense and have repeatedly worked in the real world were forgotten by many due to a campaign of deficit hysteria funded by Pete Peterson, a Republican billionaire financier who has made it his mission in life to destroy the safety net.  His ultimate goal is to privatize social security so that Wall Street can receive hundreds of billions of dollars in fees investing our retirement funds.

I’ve explained in a prior column [4] how the fiscal cliff was created through an insane bipartisan deal in August 2011.  The fiscal cliff was always a terrible job-destroying idea that also began to unravel the safety net by cutting Medicare.  Everyone involved in creating the fiscal cliff acted irresponsibly and inhumanely in seeking to inflict austerity, cause a recession, and unravel the safety net.

What is forgotten, however, in discussions of the idiocy of creating the fiscal cliff is that it was part of a broader bipartisan deal intended to inflict even more self-destructive austerity and even greater damage to the safety net.  The fiscal cliff was an act of idiocy in pursuit of a policy of depravity called “the Grand Bargain” that was actually the Grand Betrayal.

The bipartisan madness has increased since the August 2011 budget deal.  Today, the parties are simultaneously screaming (1) that the fiscal cliff is a disaster because it imposes austerity and will cause a recession and (2) that it is essential that we agree to a Grand Betrayal that will inflict even greater austerity and cause an even more severe recession.  Indeed, the Grand Betrayal mandates austerity over a decade so it is likely to cause and/or deepen multiple recessions.  The Republican and Democratic variants of the Grand Betrayal are doubly destructive and inhumane because they cut the safety net.  President Obama wants to begin to unravel the safety net and cut social programs even though an overwhelming majority of Democrats oppose it and even though doing so will inflict even greater austerity.  That will cause a deeper recession and likely make the deficit larger, so it is as nonsensical as it is cruel.

During this this entire financial farce I have been unable to get the dominant media to make the most obvious point.  Since we all agree that austerity (the fiscal cliff) is a terrible idea that will cause a recession and likely increase the deficit we must logically conclude that all variants of the Grand Betrayal are austerity programs that must be defeated in order to prevent a recession that is likely to increase the deficit.  We should all be opposing any cuts in the safety net because they would inflict austerity.  An overwhelming majority of Democrats and a majority of Republicans also oppose cuts in the safety net as inhumane.

So why don’t the Democrats and Republicans stop trying to do a deal that will inflict austerity?  Why not simply repeal the Budget Act of August 2011?  That would kill the fiscal cliff.  Repeal would kill austerity, prevent the recession, save the safety net, increase growth, and shrink the deficit.  All versions of the Grand Betrayal (Republican and Democratic) inflict austerity, are likely to cause a recession, begin to unravel the safety net, destroy growth, and increase the deficit.

Under the same logic we should be able to agree on two related actions – renew the extension of long-term unemployment compensation and renew the moratorium on collecting the payroll tax.  These policies are superb counter-cyclical programs and have the added advantage of reducing human misery and inequality.  Republicans and Democrats have agreed in the past on the desirability of both actions.

 

~~~

 

Bill Black is the author of The Best Way to Rob a Bank is to Own One [5] and an associate professor of economics and law at the University of Missouri-Kansas City. He spent years working on regulatory policy and fraud prevention as Executive Director of the Institute for Fraud Prevention, Litigation Director of the Federal Home Loan Bank Board and Deputy Director of the National Commission on Financial Institution Reform, Recovery and Enforcement, among other positions.

Bill writes a column for Benzinga every Monday. His other academic articles, congressional testimony, and musings about the financial crisis can be found at his Social Science Research Network author page [6] and at the blog New Economic Perspectives [7].

Follow him on Twitter: @williamkblack [8]


Article printed from The Big Picture: http://www.ritholtz.com/blog

URL to article: http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2012/12/kill-the-fiscal-cliff-instead-of-the-economy/

URLs in this post:

[1] New Economic Perspectives: http://neweconomicperspectives.org/p/about.html

[2] convinced: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/18/opinion/18krugman.html

[3] studies show: http://faculty.insead.edu/fatas/intrafp.pdf

[4] prior column: http://neweconomicperspectives.org/2012/12/lets-celebrate-the-failure-of-the-july-2011great-betrayal.html#more-4022

[5] The Best Way to Rob a Bank is to Own One: http://www.amazon.com/Best-Way-Rob-Bank-Own/dp/0292706383

[6] Social Science Research Network author page: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dez/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=658251

[7] New Economic Perspectives: http://neweconomicperspectives.org/

[8] @williamkblack: http://twitter.com/williamkblack

Copyright © 2008 The Big Picture. All rights reserved.