Archive for January, 2013

Why Isn’t the 30 Fixed-Rate Mortgage at 2.6% ?

Why Isn’t the Thirty-Year Fixed-Rate Mortgage at 2.6 Percent?
Andreas Fuster and David Lucca
December 31, 2012

 

 

As of mid-December, the average thirty-year fixed-rate mortgage was near its historic low of about 3.3 percent, or half its level in August 2007 when financial turmoil began. However, yield declines in the mortgage-backed-securities (MBS) market, where bundles of mortgage loans are sold to investors, have been even more dramatic. In fact, all else equal, had these declines passed through to loan rates one-for-one, the average mortgage rate would now be around 2.6 percent. In this post, we summarize some of the findings from a workshopheld at the New York Fed in early December aimed at better understanding the drivers behind the increased wedge between mortgage loan and MBS rates.

        The chart below shows the recent evolution of the gap between the two rates (the “primary-secondary spread”) as measured by the difference between a representative yield on newly issued agency MBS (the “current coupon,” or secondary rate) and the average thirty-year fixed loan rate (the “primary rate”) from the Freddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey. The spread has increased 70 basis points, on net, from around 45 basis points in 2007 to about 115 today, implying that declines in the primary rate have been smaller than those in the secondary rate. So, why is the primary rate at 3.3 percent and not at 2.6 percent today?

 

Chart-1_spread-between-mortgages

 

As we noted in a white paper prepared as background material for the workshop, a number of factors may be at play. First, the primary-secondary spread is only an imperfect proxy for the degree of “pass-through” between the MBS market and the primary market. For one thing, we can’t observe the MBS yield directly, but instead must compute it under a number of assumptions that are particularly sensitive to misspecification in the current environment. Also, the spread doesn’t take into account the guarantee fees on loans charged by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac (the agencies or “GSEs”), which have increased from 20 to 25 basis points before 2008 to about 50 basis points today.

Rising Cost or Rising Profit?
A clearer picture of the link between MBS and primary markets comes from an alternative measure that we call “Originator Profits and Unmeasured Costs,” or OPUCs. The OPUC measure captures the loan originator’s average revenue from selling a mortgage in the agency MBS market (after accounting for the guarantee fee) as well as the revenues from servicing the loan and from points paid upfront by the borrower. As the name implies, OPUCs represent either lender costs (other than the guarantee fee), lender profits, or a combination of the two.

Recent movements in OPUCs, shown in the chart below, are similar to those in the primary-secondary spread. OPUCs have increased significantly, from below $2 (per $100 loan) in the 2005-08 period to a record high of about $5, suggesting that even after accounting for the higher guarantee fees, something unusual may be occurring in mortgage markets today.

 

Chart-2_originator-profit

 

Much of the discussion at the workshop, like the analysis in the paper, revolved around the question of why OPUCs have grown so substantially. First, OPUCs could be unusually high in order to compensate originators for increased put-back risk (the risk of having to repurchase some delinquent loans from the GSEs), possible increases in pipeline hedging costs, or other loan production expenses. They could also be overstated due to a decline in the value of mortgage servicing rights. While it’s hard to measure each of these components, we tentatively concluded in the paper that these costs don’t seem to have changed sufficiently to offset the increase in OPUCs, suggesting that profits in mortgage origination have likely increased. Workshop participants overall agreed with this analysis, but also countered that while each cost increase was small on its own, their sum was a sizable amount, offsetting part of the OPUC rise. In addition, some panelists pointed to more time-intensive underwriting procedures as contributing to higher origination costs. Overall, the discussion didn’t refute the alternative explanation of higher profit levels. So what would drive such an increase in the profitability of mortgage origination?

In the paper, we discuss how lenders’ pricing power appears to have increased over the past couple of years, especially on refinancing loans. For example, we document how rates on refinancing loans, in particular those under the Home Affordable Refinance Program (HARP), have been higher than those on purchase loans, for which the market appears to be more competitive. We also note, however, that originators’ capacity constraints are likely the key driver behind the currently elevated profit levels. The chart below plots the OPUC measure against the mortgage application volume index from the Mortgage Bankers Association. OPUCs tend to increase whenever application volume rises rapidly. As discussed at the workshop, a likely interpretation of this relationship is that in such times, lenders can’t handle all the demand they would get if they lowered rates further, and thus they keep their offered rates high.

 

Chart-3_originator-profit-and-unmeasured-costs

 

In principle, when profits are high, one would expect existing firms to expand capacity or new competitors to enter the market. But workshop participants pointed out that these channels may be impaired today because of the decline in third-party originations by mortgage brokers or correspondent lenders, uncertainty about how long the high origination volumes will last, lack of clarity about future regulations, more general fear of future liability risk, or difficulty hiring qualified underwriters. As a result, profit levels and the primary-secondary spread could stay higher than normal.

What’s Next?
Given the discussion thus far, will mortgage rates eventually hit 2.6 percent if MBS prices stay at current levels? This is unlikely, we think, in part due to the increase in guarantee fees, which alone accounts for 25 to 30 basis points of the rise in the primary-secondary spread. Whether or not average mortgage rates could fall more modestly to, say, 3 percent depends crucially on the degree to which the capacity constraints in the mortgage origination industry could be alleviated and the lenders’ apparent pricing power reduced. With these issues in mind, some policy changes may be worth further consideration. For example, extending representation and warranty reliefs to different servicers for streamline refinancing programs (such as HARP) may help increase competition for these loans. More generally, making more agency loans eligible for such programs would likely lower underwriting burdens and loosen the industry’s capacity constraints without increasing the GSEs’ credit risk exposure (as the loans are already guaranteed by these institutions). Relaxing the GSE minimum net worth requirements and volume caps for loan sellers and servicers could also positively affect capacity and entry in the industry. While each of these proposals requires further study, we see these topics as staying at the forefront of the policy discussion. The pass-through from financial market conditions to consumer rates has always been of interest to central banks, but as noted at the workshop by New York Fed President William Dudley in his opening remarks and by Boston Fed President Eric Rosengren in his keynote speech, it’s of even greater interest today as large-scale purchases of agency MBS—aimed in part at lowering mortgage rates—have become a key monetary policy instrument.

~~~

Disclaimer
The views expressed in this post are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or the Federal Reserve System. Any errors or omissions are the responsibility of the authors.


Fuster_andreas
Andreas Fuster is an economist in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Research and Statistics Group.

Lucca_david

David Lucca is an economist in the Research and Statistics Group.

Category: Think Tank

Ferrari 275 GTB/4

Gorgeous car: • 0-100mph in under • 15 seconds • 91.3bhp/litre from a race-derived • 3286cc V12 with four cams • 165mph top speed Pretty slick for 1966   Source: Classic Driver

Category: Weekend

NFP: 20 Years of Net Job Creation

click for larger chart Source: JP Morgan Funds   On NFP day, I usually present you with my usual schtick as to why each month’s data point is much less important than is made out. Rather than repeat that yaddayaddayadda again this month, let’s look at the really long term 20 year chart above. A…Read More

Category: Data Analysis, Employment

Labor-Market Polarization Over the Business Cycle

Category: Think Tank

Discuss: Barack Obama is a Liberal Republican

I have been having fun mocking friends and family on both sides of the political aisle.  GOP colleagues who keep telling me BHO is a Socialist, while Dems think he is the next JFK. I enjoy disabusing them of their political biases by explaining to them Barack Obama’s actual politics. Politically, he is a modern…Read More

Category: Current Affairs, Philosophy, Politics

The Taxpayer Relief Act-a misnomer to celebrate the swearing in of the new Congress. David R. Kotok Cumberland Investments, January 3, 2013   “OMB head Jeff Zients complains that the CBO analysis is not realistic. In OMB’s view, we were not really going to go over the ‘cliff.’ Zients points out that the ‘Act’ actually…Read More

Category: Think Tank

10 Thursday PM Reads

My afternoon train reads: • The four business gangs that run the US (Sydney Morning Herald) • Bill Gross: Money for Nothin’ Writing Checks for Free (PIMCO) • Untangling Skill and Luck in Business, Sports, and Investing (Farnam Street) see also Foul shooting and luck (Sabermetric Research) • The Fall and Rise of the West…Read More

Category: Financial Press

2013 US Market Structure Predictions

Themis Trading’s 2013 US Market Structure Predictions: Yes friends, it is that time of the year. It is the time when we start anew, carefully analyze market structure trends in the US equity markets, and release our predictions for what you can expect to happen this coming year in our capital-raising marketplace. This is not…Read More

Category: Trading

S&P 500 Index at Inflection Point

Dr. David P. Kelly of JP Morgan Asset Management quarterly deck is out. Its a regular favorite of mine, laden as it is with great charts that look at the very long term. You can download the entire 69 page deck here.   click for ginormous chart Source: JP Morgan Funds

Category: Analysts, Data Analysis, Investing, Markets

Better Chinese services data

The South Korean finance ministry announced that it is to spend 72% of its 2013 budget in H1 this year, with 45% in Q1, citing economic uncertainties; Governor Shirakawa seems to be more willing to work with Mr Abe, who has announced that the BoJ must increase its inflation target and ease monetary policy materially….Read More

Category: Think Tank