Mark Hanson:

Summary…”If you buy it, they may not rent it…at the price you thought or need”

A side of the “flood of investors sucking up all the supply” story that nobody is talking about…weakening rental demand. Phoenix cap rates projected to be between 1.75% and 4% at present (unless you do all the maintenance yourself). With caps this low, one may as well buy INTC or lever up 10 year notes at 1.9% and take far less risk than buying the tail end of a Twist-induced housing market short squeeze on the verge of a ‘consolidation’.

Weak national rental demand — relative to the flood of rental single family and multi-unit supply coming on line – is a potential 2013 US housing market theme that will take it’s toll on landlords, REITs, institution investors, house prices, price/rent ratios, relative affordability, loan default & mod redefault rates (as the millions on the default fence or in high leverage mods decide it’s better to de-lever and rent), and ultimately the full blown housing recovery thesis now fully factored into every macro economic and investment models out a decade into the future.

Do you remember looking at ‘opportunity fund’ capital raising slide decks a couple of years ago? A central thesis to the ‘buy and rent’ trade was not only historic low rates forever but millions upon millions more foreclosures for the next several years and all of those former homeowners needing a place to rent. On the rates side, they nailed it. But on the rental demand side, the exact opposite happened. As every insti and private investor domestic and foreign was buying up all low-end and distressed house in the country the banks and government made 8 million loan mods and workouts turning homeowners into renters of their own home. And they made it virtually illegal to foreclose too boot. As foreclosures hit a pre-crisis low in 2012 rental demand has been by and large dictated by good ol macro economic factors such as jobs, income, tax rates, energy costs etc, none of which are screaming in the direction of more demand and higher rents.

So, in short the “buy and rent” trade has turned into one in which you have to fight the government for the demand, which is something nobody factored into the ‘investment’. On the contrary, most have stable and linear 3% to 4% annualized rent increase factored in. If rents drop 15% in the first half of 2013 (from the back half of 2012), which is a number I simply picked from my model range of -5% to -25%, everything changes literally overnight. The present lack of ‘for sale’ supply could easily turn into supply wave quickly reversing the past years’ upward house price trajectory. Some will say, ‘that’s great, the market is starved for supply’. Yes, it’s starved for specific lower-end and/or distressed ‘investor’ supply. It’s extremely questionable that if a wave of rehabbed former investor rentals were to hit the market as resales whether first-timer and repeat organic (or investor) demand would be there in kind. Some will then think of all the stories you read daily of ’40 offers on every house and organic buyers not being able to buy’. This is happening. But from most all the Realtors I talk to, it’s the same 37 investors bidding cash pushing out the 3 organic bidders that need loans in order to buy. So bottom line, a wave of rehabbed resales from panicked investors shuttering supply could quite possibly be met with meager first-timer and organic demand.

In media and sell side housing market reports that refer to the investor landlord/renter nation ‘movement’ everybody takes for granted ‘if they buy it, it will automatically rent at market rates’. In fact, most never even talk about the rental demand side of the equation because they assume it’s a ‘given’. But that’s not the case, at least in Phoenix. There is so much rental supply on the market — and coming on line — that landlords are in full blown price cutting wars. Moreover, aggressive landlords have loosened rental guidelines to accept virtually anybody with a cashiers check and heartbeat.

Bottom line: A flood of institutional and private investor landlord buyers have shredded the inventory in Phoenix, Las Vegas, CA and several other of the more legacy distressed regions around the nation. For quite some time there have been bidding wars with investors paying 10% to 20% over “appraised value” looking at cash-flow yield as the primary metric and real ‘value’ way down the list of factors. But the story has taken a major left turn at least in Phoenix, which is the first market I am studying closely. In short, as rental supply reaches record highs, rental demand is falling pervasively. This, while Phoenix house sales demand have been negative on a YoY basis for several months now with January down double-digits.

  • “Help! I have a rental that nobody wants to rent! Well, at least at the price I want to charge”
  • “Help! We have a 200 housing start community in the Phoenix area and potential buyers can rent one of a 100 houses just like the ones we are building right across the highway”
  • “Help! We have owned 300 houses in Phoenix for a year and a half, cap rates are half of what we had modeled, and rents are dropping. Humm, maybe it’s time to sell half”
  • “Help! Honey, we spent the last two weeks looking at rentals and there is so much to chose from I can’t make up my mind! Ok then, let’s go low ball them”
  • “Help! Legacy loan defaults and Modification redefaults in AZ have suddenly started rising again. Perhaps this has something to do with the plethora of rehabbed single family houses available for rent in the region. I guess we have to start ratcheting up loan loss reserves this quarter”.
  • “Help! BlackOchPersTress fund just called and wants to list 200 single family houses for sale!”

I think there is a strong chance that we could all of a sudden see for-sale inventory levels rising sharply and prices dropping in the ultimate whip-saw event this spring/summer that ‘nobody saw coming’. Throughout history investor and first-time buyer demand has been known to ‘vanish’ literally overnight. Legacy distressed markets markets like Phoenix all around the country have been supported by these cohorts for years. And with over TWO-THIRDS OF all mortgage’d households in Phoenix unable to sell and rebuy (due to epidemic negative and effective negative equity, credit, or income problems) the repeat buyer cohort will not be able to catch this market as it drops.

Recent, First-Hand Phoenix Rental Market Experience

I have some friends in the Phoenix “skirts”, Chandler, AZ to be exact. Chandler AZ (like Gilbert and Mesa) is a burb of Phoenix known for overbuilding, foreclosures, a ton of single family houses etc. But it’s also known for it’s family bias, decent schools etc. Areas like this are where investors have swarmed to buy and rent single family houses. Reports typically generalize the Phoenix outskirts as “Phoenix”.

My friends recently had a third kid and needed a new house so went out looking last summer. They are significantly underwater in their present house but their Realtor promised them it would be no problem to rent out their house after they bought the new one. So, they went housing shopping beginning in July. Every house they liked there were multiple offers, most all from investors. They couldn’t get an offer even looked at for months because they were not a cash buyer…they had a contingency that the purchase price and appraised value had to jive… they could not pay 15% over appraised value like Blackrock does…they are NOT paying with other people’s money…you get my point here.

Finally, they found a “HUD” foreclosure (HUD resales generally have “no investor” provisions), were first to bid, and got the house. They moved in a few weeks ago. After they spent a bunch of money fixing up their old house they put it up for rent hoping to get someone in quickly because they technically can’t afford the new house without the rental income. The day they listed their old house for rent they considered their “move” complete. Little did they know the stress was just beginning.

“Still, no calls on our rental”

To set the stage properly their old house is “worth” about $120k. They initially put it up for rent at $1100/mo. After expenses and at a 90% occupancy rate this would equate to about a 5% cap rate. Not great, but not a killer. This is of course if they got $1100 a month. But they didn’t…not even close.

The first week the rental ad ran no calls came. So, they lowered their rental price by 10% the second week. Still, no calls. They lowered their price by 15% the third week and a couple of calls came but it was from people wanting to “make an offer”. This weekend they lowered the price by 20% — to $875 — and they got 2 calls. While $875 still works for them they are beginning to panic. Last week they talked to their Realtor extremely concerned about the lack of rental demand. He replied “the market has changed dramatically in the past 6 months. There is a flood of rental supply and not enough renters so there is a price cutting war by landlords just to get people in”. If they end up getting $800/mo that’s about a 2-cap.

Note, a 5-cap is a rate of return far too low for most insti investors, a 2-cap is a non-starter for all but the investors who have to deploy capital (typically other people’s capital) in order to get a paycheck. Anyway, my friend’s house is in the rental sweet spot, which makes this story even more pertinent to the rental investor community. That’s because as you go higher in house price/value rents don’t keep up, so cap rates fall.

Like everything else in the housing sector since even before the crash happened…a key piece of the story is being left out of all the sell side research and financial press “housing recovery” stories. In the case of Phoenix — and most likely most other heavily distressed regions turned ‘investor havens’ throughout the nation — it looks like the missing piece of the story is the lackluster demand for the mega-supply and nowhere remotely close to the rental returns investors had hoped for unless you bought the right property in a relatively small window that slammed shut in early 2012.

Rental Supply Glut will Promote Increase in Strategic Loan Defaults & Mod Redefaults

Another consequence of the surge in rental supply and drop in rental rates should be a rise in loan defaults and mod redefaults. In Phoenix for example over 60% of the mortgage’d population is underwater or effectively underwater, many living with high LTV and DTI mods. Many of these Zombie homeowners simply find it easier to pay their 2% to the bank or for a HAMP mod than to finally de-lever through foreclosure or short sale and move their families, change schools etc. However, if all of a sudden houses similar to theirs are popping up in the neighborhood for lease without the expense of taxes, insurance, and maintenance it will absolutely push borrowers on the default fence or struggling every month with high DTI mods out of their houses into rentals.

In closing…

I have believed for a long time that the activity in Phoenix — and regions with similar ‘investor activity around the nation — was a short squeeze…a trade…nothing “durable”…on the back of Twist and 1.5% 10s. This due to a variety of fundamental factors least of which is that over 60% of all mortgage’d homeowners in the region are underwater ‘Zombies’ (not enough equity to sell and rebuy) and at least a third of those who aren’t Zombies don’t have the credit or income necessary to sell and rebuy; and the mortgage mod bubble further preventing the all-important repeat buyer cohort from selling and rebuying.

I have also believed for a long time that the lack of foreclosures — and the mortgage mod/workout bubble — would ultimately be a killer for those hoping to rent houses to distressed borrowers. Of course, that’s because the banks and gov’t let all these potential borrowers rent their owns houses from them a 2% interest only for 5 years. And this is exactly how it’s playing out.

I will be going to Phoenix shortly in order to meet with several brokers and new-era “landlords” but until then I wanted to get this theme out to you.

Best Regards,

Mark Hanson

Category: Real Estate, Think Tank

Please use the comments to demonstrate your own ignorance, unfamiliarity with empirical data and lack of respect for scientific knowledge. Be sure to create straw men and argue against things I have neither said nor implied. If you could repeat previously discredited memes or steer the conversation into irrelevant, off topic discussions, it would be appreciated. Lastly, kindly forgo all civility in your discourse . . . you are, after all, anonymous.

3 Responses to “Is There a Rental Supply Glut?”

  1. BenE says:

    That’s what happens when you try to re-inflate bubbles for the sake crooked bankers. More housing is not what we need when boomers are about to retire and downsize or move to retirement homes. Shame on everyone involved.

  2. Moopheus says:

    Developers in the “Bubble Ground zero” areas like Phoenix built way more housing than needed. They still have excess housing. Phoenix still has one of the highest apartment vacancy rates in the country. That means some landlords are not going to get their price for apartments. This is not really hard to understand. Where I live, the vacancy rate is less than 2%. All the biotech labs going up around here isn’t going to make it easier. And now I’ve heard Facebook is moving in, too.

  3. theexpertisin says:

    Entities snapping up foreclosed single family homes, each with a unique footprint and maintenance needs will discover that the cost of ownership and the abuse of property that comes with family occupancy with no skin in the game except a rent payment results in a pathetically poor business model.

    The best that can be hoped for in this rental segment is to sell the single family homes as prices for these properties go up. This is far from assured in many localities. It used to be that entities being the bank, selling homes and collecting the mortgage payments, was a money machine, but the ultra low interest rate template has pulled the rug out from that scheme.

    Apartment complexes have many advantages over the single family home rental for investors. Profit being one.