David R. Kotok
April 29, 2013
Last week, the public was enraged by the needless disruption in air traffic. People created websites, made calls and sent email to Congress and the White House, and launched an attack on Democrats and Republicans alike. In one week, the wrath of the American citizenry created a necessary and successful change in policy. It demonstrated that angry American voters can coalesce around an issue when their anger reaches the boiling point and they set aside partisan politics. They said to their elected representatives, “You, Senator and Congressman [not "Democrat" or "Republican"] are responsible for poor governance.”
It took a week of pain. It cost the US economy billions of dollars. It cost operating businesses time and money and discouraged them from investing and hiring – and this particular disruption only lasted a week. Now, imagine the ongoing effects of sequestration on the rest of the federal government.
Keeping in mind the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) experience, let’s speculate a little about other potential trouble going forward – particularly the sort of trouble that could be made worse by the federal government’s failure to allow departments to prioritize, as we saw last week.
Will the next crisis take the form of a public-health disaster? Are we going to see a lack of sufficient preparation in case H7N9 bird flu mutates and emerges as a pandemic?
We have a rapidly mutating and very troubling flu virus spreading in the world. There are over 100 confirmed human cases. One out of every five cases has resulted in death, and almost all other reported cases have been hospitalized, with most remaining seriously ill. Only a handful have walked out of the hospital fully cured. Are we now missing information about this risk because of sequestration?
Or will the next crisis happen due to inadequate care for the poor and elderly? Will it instead result from inadequate flood control on our rivers or perhaps from cutbacks to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association’s (NOAA) national weather forecasting services? Will the next big failure occur because the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) can no longer adequately oversee the safety of our food, or will it be a deadly disaster that could have been prevented had there not been a falloff in bridge and rail-safety inspections?
Or is there another major issue that will emerge, take center stage, and then trigger rage once more because we citizens will not be content with the quality of our governance? If so, then we will again light up the White House switchboard; email Senators and Congressman, call them on the phone, and send them telegrams; and launch another round of hot-issue websites.
In place of “Don’t Ground America,” the website might be “Don’t Sicken America” or “Don’t Starve America” or “Protect America” or “Make America Safe and Secure Against Terrorist Attacks” – or something else.
From where we sit, a milestone has been reached in the US: citizen anger rose to the point of reaction. Americans are very slow to anger. We tolerate awful governance in Washington. We go on about our business and act as though we cannot do anything about the problem. Over half of us give up and don’t vote. But once angered, the citizens of the US have the capacity to take their country back. And we did it last week.
Now we have to do it again, or we’ll soon lapse back to divisive partisan politics, finger pointing by Democrats at Republicans and by Republicans at Democrats, finger pointing by the White House at the Congress and by Congress at the White House. America, if the finger pointing continues, I hope we will inflict more wrath on our Senators and Congressmen, both Democrats and Republicans – the men and women who we elected to represent us in Washington.
Meanwhile, markets are facing a slowdown in 2Q2013. Worldwide, statistics are trending in favor of a slowdown. Incomes are rising, but very slowly. The corporate-profit share is very wide, but it may have peaked. The labor-income share, on the other hand, is very low, and it may be bottoming. Each shock delivered by Washington sets back the process of recovery, whittles the growth rate and jobs, and extends the period in which interest rates will remain near zero according to the central banks of the developed world.
This trend is bullish for stocks and other asset classes. Low interest rates, very low growth, and no inflation pressure create rising prices for assets of all types.
In the longer run, this is a terribly unhealthy circumstance, and our longer-term outlook deteriorates progressively as our Washington politicians continue their disjointed puppets’ dance.
From a strategic point of view, we remain fully invested. We are back and fully invested in the US stock market and have been participating in the rally. There was a temporary respite during which we raised some cash that has now been redeployed.
On the bond side, we expect interest rates to remain low for an extended period. We are gradually transitioning accounts in preparation for rising interest rates, although we do not expect to see them this year and perhaps not for another 2-4 years. The timing of the interest-rate shift makes future strategic moves is impossible to determine. We continue to gradually phase in hedged accounts in order to protect against long-term interest-rate risk.
We watch and worry about Washington. And we worry about our country.
David R. Kotok, Chairman and Chief Investment Officer, Cumberland Advisors
Category: Think Tank
Please use the comments to demonstrate your own ignorance, unfamiliarity with empirical data and lack of respect for scientific knowledge. Be sure to create straw men and argue against things I have neither said nor implied. If you could repeat previously discredited memes or steer the conversation into irrelevant, off topic discussions, it would be appreciated. Lastly, kindly forgo all civility in your discourse . . . you are, after all, anonymous.