iplF2KsGFI.s
Source: WSJ

 

The Labor market continues to improve. Last week Bureau of Labor Statistics reported 204,000 new positions created, and adjustments to prior months data were upward.

But the gains are not all they are cracked up to be. The jobs recovery has not been evenly distributed. The beneficiaries of the economic recovery have been a somewhat narrow group: Those who are highly educated and already are high earners are feeling the positive effects in both employment and wage gains. For the rest of the labor pool, it is not nearly so rosy a story.

Consider the difference in joblessness: Unemployment rates for those with a college degree is just 3.8 percent; its even lower for those with graduate degrees. Those workers who have less than high-school diplomas? Their unemployment rate is 10.9 percent.1

Wage differences are also similarly stark. The top quartile has seen 12.2 percent increase in wages since the recession ended in 2009. The bottom quartile’s gains have been half that, at 6.0 percent. The gains are even greater for the top decile, with heavy concentrations of wage increases in the top 1 percent.

As the Wall Street Journal noted, this is why the “four-year-old upturn still doesn’t feel like one to many Americans.” As high earners are spending their disposable incomes on luxury goods, much of the rest of the economy feels stuck in neutral.

As Bloomberg View showed in an interactive graphic on Friday, many well-paying middle-class jobs have disappeared. Manufacturing and construction and two sectors that have done rather poorly in this recovery.

There are lots of other examples of this bifurcation. Young versus old, high-education versus low-education, highly skilled vs. unskilled.

Perhaps the biggest split surprise is in confidence levels. As the chart above shows, there is a split just about at the level of median household income in the US (~$51,000). Those whose families are earning above that line are feeling more comfortable with the slowly improving economy, improving wages and job security. Those below the median income levels say they have far less confidence in the economy. There is a huge 47.5 point gap between the two.

 

Source: WSJSource: WSJ

Usually by this point in the recovery, the economic gains are less lumpy and more evenly distributed. Whether it’s a function of this being a post-credit-crisis era, or a somewhat artificially manufactured economy, it points out a weakness in the current employment situation.

It could be worse — we could be suffering from Europe’s elevated unemployment levels — well over 10 percent in many countries.

 

 

Originally published here

Category: Data Analysis, Employment

Please use the comments to demonstrate your own ignorance, unfamiliarity with empirical data and lack of respect for scientific knowledge. Be sure to create straw men and argue against things I have neither said nor implied. If you could repeat previously discredited memes or steer the conversation into irrelevant, off topic discussions, it would be appreciated. Lastly, kindly forgo all civility in your discourse . . . you are, after all, anonymous.

3 Responses to “The Bifurcated Recovery in Jobs”

  1. farmera1 says:

    Welcome to the new normal.

    -Robots, computers and automation are replacing labor
    - Need cheap untrained labor, go over seas
    -Capital is hammering labor (low interest rates, cheap available capital, all add to the growth of replacing humans with machines)

    Productivity gains reflected by wage gains for the last 30 years or so have gone to the upper percentages (say 5%) of wage earners.

    Get used to it. Why will this change? Me thinks not. There is no rosy picture to be had. It will continue to get tougher for the uneducated labor. They are competing directly with cheap foreign labor, robots and all kinds of automation.

  2. S Brennan says:

    Better for some? To be sure, but this handy-dandy Labor Force participation calculator [you get to set the time scale Sherman], I set it to 1978-2013 and Oct shows 62.8% which is down from 65.0% in 2009.

    http://data.bls.gov/pdq/SurveyOutputServlet

    To prophylactically prevent the same tired excuses, if you peel back the data, it’s younger people who are “not participating”…older people are actually increasing their participation. So yes…

    Houston…we have a problem here.