Explaining Iraq

We live in a star culture. But the “New York Times” did not get the memo, they let some of their biggest stars go, from Frank Rich to David Pogue to Nate Silver.

Unfortunately, all three are languishing without the imprimatur and the distribution of the “Times,” but if you read the memo, literally, the “Times” is suffering too.

Another exile is Ezra Klein, who was with the “Washington Post.” Klein has a new perspective on the news. That it’s being covered like a sport, with daily winners and losers, and if you’re not paying attention, you’re left out. Klein says he’s into stories that live on the web, that have life after their initial posting, kind of like the page on the secret menu at In-N-Out, which got little traction at first, but over the years has gotten tons. (Hey, there’s a music analogy there! Your record may be number one for a week, but have the shelf life of milk, listen to Beyonce’s super-duper video album recently?) So Klein’s new site has explanatory stories, for those who don’t follow the news with a passion, like the above one on Iraq. I recommend scanning at least the headlines, because you’ll finally understand what’s happening.

As for Nate Silver, he was the only one who analyzed the Eric Cantor defeat by data as opposed to emotion. He called it an “earthquake” and now other commentators have employed that term. Read what he had to say here.

Also on his site, Silver has a bracket wherein they’re going to determine the best burrito in America, once again employing data. Analyzing to what degree Yelp is accurate.

I believe Ezra Klein’s site Vox and Silver’s Fivethirtyeight have a long way to go in order to rise above. My passion for their cutting edge ideas has had me checking their sites for weeks, but only now am I even being seduced.

It’s very hard to break into people’s consciousness today. Even if you were a star somewhere else.

Which is why a star should debate whether they really want to leave the team. And the team should pay dearly for the star. In other words, the “New York Times” is not bigger than its writers, that’s last century thinking, today stars rule, in business, journalism and entertainment.

But both Klein and Silver are young. They’ll outlast the baby boomers running the old media. Will they inherit the earth?


Subscribe to the LefsetzLetter

Visit the archive


Category: Financial Press, Markets, Think Tank

Please use the comments to demonstrate your own ignorance, unfamiliarity with empirical data and lack of respect for scientific knowledge. Be sure to create straw men and argue against things I have neither said nor implied. If you could repeat previously discredited memes or steer the conversation into irrelevant, off topic discussions, it would be appreciated. Lastly, kindly forgo all civility in your discourse . . . you are, after all, anonymous.

6 Responses to “Explaining Iraq”

  1. ilsm says:


    Good rundown.

    According to the source 60-70% of Iraq is Shiite. US made a boatload of mistakes since 2003. One was sending money, etc. to Sunni Sheiks that we now see coming back to the government.

  2. RW says:

    The flipside is that many of the older ‘stars’ remaining are badly tarnished by the history of their own words; e.g.,

    Brooks, Wieseltier: Cries of American Weakness by the People Who Weakened America

    Cries for American military preparedness are growing louder and louder by the day, rising, circling, and echoing one another in a frenzy that even the awfulness of events in Ukraine and many other places doesn’t quite explain. The reason, according to Leon Wieseltier, David Brooks, and other prophets of American Destiny, is that (as I quoted Wieseltier here on March 10) President Obama “is not raising the country up, he is tutoring it in ruefulness and futility…” …

    What none of the prophets has noticed is that we no longer have an army with a large pool of fit recruits, or an adequate budget, or even a national will, owing partly and inescapably to stances that these blowhards of American Destiny have urged us to take since before 9/11 and owing to the associations and compromises they’ve made.

    NB: Not that any of these clowns were stars in my universe but apparently they did attract readers and presumably still do since they are still published.

  3. Molesworth says:

    I missed the connection to Iraq.


    ADMIN: First Link, but its really about Journalism

  4. mitchn says:

    Ezra who? Nate who? It’s all about platforms. I’ll take the New York Times and the Washington Post over whatever those guys have come up with to try to get rich.

  5. Robert M says:

    No! They did not learn the lesson of Proximo and will therefore never be able to suckle upon the whore known as Rome