Chances are that when you think about math—which, for most of us, happens pretty infrequently—you don’t think of it in anything like the way that Jordan Ellenberg does. Ellenberg is a rare scholar who is both a math professor (at the University of Wisconsin-Madison) and a novelist. And in his fascinating new book, How Not to Be Wrong: The Power of Mathematical Thinking, he deploys analyses of poetry, politics, and even religion in a bold recasting of what math is in the first place.

For Ellenberg, the stuff you hated about math in high school isn’t the core of the thing. He’s emphatic that mathematics isn’t simply about the calculations involving, you know, numbers; rather, it’s a highly nuanced approach to solving problems that we all, unavoidably, encounter. Ellenberg’s chapters range from showing how mathematical thinking undermines many popular proofs for the existence of God (Paley’s design argument, Pascal’s wager), to explaining how math helps us understand why smoking causes lung cancer (contrary to claims by one early statistician who actually argued that the causation might be reversed—that lung cancer might cause smoking!).

On the show this week we talked to Ellenberg about his book, and math: why you’re probably thinking about it all wrong, and why it’s so powerful.

This episode also features a short interview with Tasneem Raja, author of the must-read new article “We Can Code It: Why computer literacy is key to winning the 21st century” in Mother Jones, and a discussion of new findings about autism and possibly how to stop it—by making brain cells better able to communicate with one another.

Category: Mathematics, Video

Please use the comments to demonstrate your own ignorance, unfamiliarity with empirical data and lack of respect for scientific knowledge. Be sure to create straw men and argue against things I have neither said nor implied. If you could repeat previously discredited memes or steer the conversation into irrelevant, off topic discussions, it would be appreciated. Lastly, kindly forgo all civility in your discourse . . . you are, after all, anonymous.

5 Responses to “Math Is The Ultimate Bull$*&t Detector”

  1. VennData says:

    Math is right if it’s adding up wealth, because power comes from wealth.

    The Supreme Court the guys you GOPers voted for put into place say there are no limits to political spending, saying “Let Congress decided if they want spending limits…”

    Congress, yeah, you mean the One with the House that wants to shut down gov’t again?

    While our bridges, roads crumble and our infrastructure looks Third World.

    In America Might makes right. That’s GOP math.

  2. CD4P says:

    Couldn’t be more accurate than MCI/Worldcom moving $1 bil from one side of the ledger to the other.

  3. [...] I suppose we will have to be philosophical about it all until physicists can do their math. [...]

  4. Christopher says:

    -2.9% Q1 GDP = Math

    “It was the weather’s fault!” = Bullshit

  5. bear_in_mind says:

    What VennData said, with verve and gusto.