During the past few months, we have posted a few words here on the quandary that is hedge funds. One such effort was titled “The Hedge-Fund Manager Dilemma,” and it explored the public’s fascination with the hedge-fund crowd. The next, “Why Investors Love Hedge Funds,” looked at why, despite stunning underperformance during the past decade, so much money was still flowing to the hedge funds.

Now, we are seeing early signs that some institutional investors are losing patience. Case in point: California Public Employees’ Retirement System. The Wall Street Journal noted that the pension fund is looking to reduce hedge-fund holdings by as much as 40 percent. “Public pensions from California to Ohio are backing away from hedge funds because of concerns about high fees and lackluster returns.”

Although this might be a rational response to issues of costs and performance, I would hasten to add that this is only anecdotal evidence. When we look at data such as money flows, it suggests hedge funds are continuing to pull in cash at an astounding pace. The hedge-fund-industrial complex now commands more than $3 trillion in assets. That is up from $2.04 trillion in 2012, and a mere $118 billion in 1997.

Calpers has a reputation for being a thought leader in the institutional-investment world. I have spoken with various pension funds and foundations over the past few years, and while the issue of hedge funds is under discussion, there is no consensus. Based on what various folks in the U.S. and Europe say, there still is great interest in hedge funds. Many investors are more than willing to forsake beta (returns that match the market) in the mad pursuit of alpha (above-market returns).

Still, this looks like it might be the start of something interesting.    Continues here

Category: Hedge Funds, Investing, Psychology

Please use the comments to demonstrate your own ignorance, unfamiliarity with empirical data and lack of respect for scientific knowledge. Be sure to create straw men and argue against things I have neither said nor implied. If you could repeat previously discredited memes or steer the conversation into irrelevant, off topic discussions, it would be appreciated. Lastly, kindly forgo all civility in your discourse . . . you are, after all, anonymous.

3 Responses to “Tales of the Death of Hedge Funds Have Been Greatly Exaggerated”

  1. GeorgeBurnsWasRight says:

    I can give you a general explanation about why the belief in hedge fund outperformance exists.

    Once something becomes a belief, it’s almost impervious to being refuted by facts for many people. Surveys show strong support for many beliefs which are contrary to fact. Hedge fund outperformance is just one of those. Human beings are only sometimes rational.

    More interesting to me is how some piece of information or misinformation gets widely incorporated into people’s belief systems. We’re awash in a sea of facts, most of which don’t get incorporated into our belief systems. Is there something about the ones that do get incorporated, is there something about the way that proponents present the information, or is there something that makes our minds more likely to latch onto certain things?

  2. [...] “http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2014/07/tales-of-the-death-of-hedge-funds-have-been-greatly-exag… This entry was tagged Been, Death, Exaggerated, Funds, Greatly, Hedge, Tales. Bookmark the [...]

  3. catclub says:

    The article on the Calpers changes also distinguishes between hedge fund and private equity. Calper still has a huge amount of private equity investments. I am not sure if Barry is making that distinction when he says Hedge funds now have $3Tr in assets.