Posts filed under “Apprenticed Investor”
Many metrics can be used to value markets. Which should you trust?
Washington Post, March 7 2015
“Faced with the choice between changing one’s mind and proving that there is no need to do so, almost everyone gets busy on the proof.”
— John Kenneth Galbraith
Let’s take a look at the valuation of U.S. markets. This is relevant to investors, as valuation determines future expected returns.
There are three commandments to consider:
●Thou shalt consider a full assortment of all valuation metrics;
●Thou shalt not cherry-pick only those metrics that support your preferred outcome;
●Thou shalt focus on the very best measure of market valuation, according to academic research and data.
These should have the force of moral law for anyone who wants to understand whether stocks are cheap or expensive.
Starting with our first commandment, let’s look at a wide assortment of metrics that can help determine equity valuation.
The equity strategy group in Merrill Lynch’s research department looks across 16 measures — a full range of metrics that describe the U.S. stock market, including trailing price-to-earnings, Shiller price-to-earnings, price-to-book ratio and the Standard & Poor’s 500-stock index in terms of the price of gold or West Texas Intermediate crude oil. This approach shows the markets as being anywhere from cheap to expensive, depending on your favored metric. Last year, the valuation spectrum showed U.S. markets as slightly undervalued. More recently, they appear to be at fair value.
It is noteworthy that those who have ignored this approach have missed significant, ongoing gains in U.S. equities.
That leads us to our second commandment: Thou shalt not cherry-pick metrics that support your preferred valuation.
Anyone can point to a metric that shows stocks as either cheap or expensive.
Those who are bearish usually go for Trailing Price to Earnings ratio (17.1 P/E), which shows stocks as pricey, or the even more expensive Shiller’s Cyclically Adjusted PE, which show stocks as very pricey (26.8 CAPE).
Conversely, those who are bullish choose other metrics: They select price to free cash flow or price to normalized earnings to show markets as cheap. The Standard & Poor’s 500-stock index is valued at 22.3 times free cash flow — about 22 percent below its average reading from 1986 to 2014. Price to normalized earnings is at 18.6 times, or 2 percent less than its post-September 1987 average.
Consider what professors Eugene Fama (University of Chicago Booth School of Business, 2013 Nobel laureate in economic sciences) and Ken French (professor of Finance at the Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth College) have observed about all of these different methods of valuation: “Different price ratios are just different ways to scale a stock’s price with a fundamental, to extract the information in the cross-section of stock prices about expected returns.”
That sounds complex, but it can be simplified as follows: Are stocks priced above or below their historic fair value? Based on that, are future returns likely be higher or lower than average?
This simple explanation is what all of these data points are really attempting to figure out. Metrics based on fundamental factors are trying to discern average historic valuation. But it is important to recognize how easily different people can reach different conclusions, like in John Godfrey Saxe’s poem about the blind men describing the elephant. Some of that is a function of what part of the beast they are touching, while other times it is a result of their own biases.
Given how many ways there are to measure stock prices, those who give in to their personal predilections have a wide variety of choices. However, selecting the metric that supports your existing position tells us nothing about the markets and everything about your previously held beliefs.
Hence, I am always wary when a specific metric is selected to prove how cheap or expensive markets are — especially if that analyst had previously ignored said metric.
So we have looked at a broad assortment of metrics. This has some value, but it is inconclusive. And this approach specifically keeps our selective perception from duping us into cherry-picking the metric that suits our preferences.
Now, the last commandment: Picking the metric with the very best historic track record.
Wouldn’t it be fantastic if we could filter out the noise and go straight to a single best measure of stock market valuation? To do just that, we turn to the academic literature. As it turns out, a number of studies point to ways to assess the value of a stock market.
Perhaps the most readable of these is from Wesley Gray and Jack Vogel: “Analyzing Valuation Measures: A Performance Horse-Race Over the Past 40 Years” (Drexel University, January 2012). A close second is Tim Loughran and Jay W. Wellman’s “New Evidence on the Relation Between the Enterprise Multiple and Average Stock Returns” (Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 2010).
These papers (and others) have identified a ratio that has been described as the single most successful measure of valuation in terms of historical track record: EV/EBITDA.
EV stands for “enterprise value”; EBITDA is the acronym for “earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization.”
Enterprise value is somewhat different from a company’s market value. To calculate EV, we take the number of shares outstanding times the company’s stock price. Add in the amount of debt outstanding, then reduce by the cash/short-term investments. Lastly, subract any other holdings that have value (i.e., ownership in other companies). Enterprise value is a comprehensive measure of the core business.
EBITDA lets an investor compare revenues with expenditures. Perhaps the best way to think of this is as taking the revenue and subtracting the costs that go solely into running a business. That removes any financial engineering and many accounting gimmicks from the equation. It is a fairly simple way to consider a firm’s efficiency at its core business.
Enterprise value for the S&P 500 has risen no higher than 10 times EBITDA since stocks began their bull-market run in March 2009, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. The peak was reached last month. The EV/EBITDA ratio reached 12.6 in 2007, when the credit-fueled five-year advance ended in a broad financial crisis.
Hence, what has been considered the best-performing measure of markets suggests that U.S. stocks are not expensive — are indeed priced fairly. This strongly suggests that the expected future returns for U.S. equities will be about their historic average.
> This morning in my Sunday Washington Post Business Section column, we look at the issue of how expensive U.S. stocks are. There are several ways to determine this, fraught with the potential for error. If you want to determine how cheap or expensive the stock market is, I suggest three commandments to consider: ●Thou shalt…Read More
Much of the financial world is all abuzz over the 50th annual letter to shareholders of Berkshire Hathaway, released this past weekend.Financial journalists, amateur Buffett sleuths, Graham & Dodd aficionados and just about everyone I know spent some quality time this weekend with this letter. They are all trying to identify that one pearl of wisdom that…Read More
What do falling oil prices mean for the U.S. in the short and long term Barry Ritholtz Washington Post, February 14 2015 Since early 2014, the price of oil has plummeted. It peaked last year at $105 a barrel and is now about $50.The consumption and production of energy is a major…Read More
My Sunday Washington Post Business Section column is out, where we look at the impact of energy on the Economy. The print version had the full headline “The oil supply, energy demand and a rip-roaring U.S. dollar: What it means for your portfolio” while online had the shorter What do falling oil prices mean for…Read More
Now before I commit blasphemy, a few words: I am as close to being a Boglehead as you will find, without actually being one. The bulk of my portfolio is in passive indexes. Most of the assets I manage are in a broad allocation model. This is a tribute to the wisdom and teachings of investing…Read More
> My Sunday Washington Post Business Section column is out. This morning, we look at why It’s time to market forecasters to admit the errors of their ways. It is yet another look at the parade of really bad forecasts we get treated to constantly in the world of investing and finance. Here’s an excerpt…Read More
For investors, it’s a perfect time to go back to the basics Barry Ritholtz Washington Post, December 21, 2014 Look around you: This is the time of year when the pages of newspapers and magazines are filled with predictions and lists and all manner of money-losing nonsense. I have pushed back against much…Read More
> My Sunday Washington Post Business Section column is out. This morning, we look at a few basics of investing that many investors get wrong. Here’s an excerpt from the column: “Today, I am going to suggest you take a different route: Focus on 10 basic, simple truths that many investors seemingly ignore. Some…Read More
Motivational speaker Anthony Robbins has a new book on investing, “Money: Master the Game.” It is his first book in two decades, and he has been everywhere, flogging it directly onto the best-seller list. The good news is that the book contains snippets of conversations with some of the world’s greatest investors. The bad news…Read More