Posts filed under “Employment”

Flatlining GDP & NFP

As much as I typically like to discuss NFP on the first Friday of each month, I find myself unable to muster the usual blather. Not because the initial data is near garbage, subject to massive revision, and wildly off from reality — that’s a given.

No, today I find myself unable to get enthused about NFP because I am still reeling from the horrific GDP data we got yesterday.

Gdp_wsj_20070531
Yesterday we learned that in Q1 2007, the economy expanded at the near zero growth pace of 0.15%. That’s practically flatlined. This was the worst reading since a 0.2% increase in Q4 of 2002.

What’s that, you ask? In the media, GDP was reported at 0.6% you say? Um, no — that’s the annualized rate — take Q1 GDP and go mulitple it 4X and THAT’s how you get to a still pitiful 0.6%.

The sunshine crowd bamboozled the press on this big time. Articles such as this one: U.S. Economy: First Quarter May Have Been Low Point — report conjecture as fact and completely ignore what the actual data is. The WSJ was no better:  Slow Growth May Presage Pickup.

Or not. 

Here are the facts: The U.S. economy grew last quarter at
the slowest pace in more than four years. The initial GDP report of 1.3% was actually more than double twhat the updated data showed, and was 25% below economists consensus. Housing, slack capex investment, declining consumer activity all are responsible for part of the slowdown.

Meanwhile in Europe, Business Investment has picked up dramatically. Europe’s economy is growing about 4X the rate of the US in Q1.

Also included in the Commerce Department Data was that consumer spending was revised upward, to 4.4% from 3.8%. Note that if not for this revision, we would be talking about a sub 0% GDP. That would be the first quarter of 2 needed for the official measure of a recession.

How is it possible that consumer spending rose, when 80% of retailers have been missing numbers? Easy: Rising prices (not sales) in food and energy. You know, those elements the Fed hates to measure when it comes to inflation.

How and why most economists think that this is the low point is simply beyond me.

>

Sources:
U.S. Economy: First Quarter May Have Been Low Point

Shobhana Chandra
Bloomberg, May 31, 2007
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601068&sid=amY1npUWWskA&

Europe’s Economy Grows 0.6%, Led by Investment Surge
Fergal O’Brien
Bloomberg, June 1 2007
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601068&sid=aVGPpxHmSbpk&

Slow Growth May Presage Pickup
Thinned-Out Inventories Mean More Output Ahead; Consumers Propel Economy
SUDEEP REDDY
WSJ, June 1, 2007; Page A2
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118061455598919992.html

Category: Data Analysis, Economy, Employment

Business Employment Dynamics & NFP

Category: Data Analysis, Economy, Employment, Psychology

WSJ: Overstated Job Market Strength?

Category: Data Analysis, Economy, Employment

More on NFP: More Recognition of Disbelief

Category: Data Analysis, Economy, Employment, Psychology

NFP: 88k (and I don’t believe even that)

The Payroll numbers are out, and they are not particularly pretty:

88,000 new jobs were created in April, according to BLS. This is the weakest job gain since November ’04. Cumulative revisions for prior months were to the downside by 26,000.

As expected, losses were in Manufacturing (19k), Retail (26k) and Construction (11k). The  weakness in Construction has been very uted, implying that the full impact of the housing slow down has yet to be fully realized.

Biggest gains were had in Services (116k), Education and Health (53k), Gov’t (25k) Professional (24k) and Leisure/Hospitality (22k).    

Temporary help jobs fell for a 3rd month (January was flat) making 4 consecutive months of no gains. Temp help tends to lead employment gains, and this weakness can be read as a future forecastor of employment.

We don’t pay close attention to the Household survey, (the self reported number is very volatile) but the drop of -468k was an eyebrow raiser.

~~~

Birth Death Adjustment:  A whopping 317k B/D adjustment — that is the single largest "adjustment" on record for any single given month. And despite that giant add, the number was a very soft 88k.

To put this into some context, of those 317k new jobs hypothesized by BLS, 49k of those supposed jobs are in construction. Now what are the odds of that?

While Wall Street celebrates the upcoming recession, let me remind you that this economy requires about 150k new monthly jobs to merely keeep up with population growth.


Read More

Category: Data Analysis, Economy, Employment

NFP: The Return of the Over?

Category: Data Analysis, Economy, Employment

GDP Ex Housing

Category: Data Analysis, Economy, Employment, Real Estate

Week in Preview

Category: Earnings, Economy, Employment, Markets

Housing Slowdown Sector Impact

Category: Economy, Employment, Markets, Real Estate, Retail

More on Mortgage Equity Withdrawals and Consumer Spending

Category: Consumer Spending, Economy, Employment, Psychology, Real Estate