Posts filed under “Employment”

Moving the Goalposts: Fugly NFP

The Human capacity for self-delusion never ceases to amaze. If you ever hear me spouting the same sort of $%#* I heard on CNBC at 8:31am, grab me by the lapels, throw a glass of water in my face, slap me HARD across the face, and yell "WAKE UP MAN, YOU’RE DELIRIOUS!"

How this month’s NFP was labelled "perfect" is simply beyond my ken. The only rational explanations I can think of are an unwitting influx of Psylociben or perhaps blunt head trauma. Steve Liesman was the notable exception, as he came away rather unimpressed with the data.

Let me say the nicest things I can say about NFP first: it was consistent with consensus expectations of Wall Street economists. The prior two months were revised higher, and the the unemployment rate fell slightly. Business and professional services companies’ payrolls rose 26,000. Commercial construction added 17,000 (4,000 from residential!), making up for some of the losses in Home Sector (including residential building, real estate agents, mortgage brokers, contractors, etc.).

Beyond that, the details of the report are just fugly (citations in parens):

- The mix of job growth remains skewed toward low-paying industries;

- Weakness is most evident in the retail component — which has stopped growing;

- Almost one-half of the rise occurred in the health and social assistance category — generally low-paying jobs;

- Other sectors have not picked up the slack
(Joshua Shapiro, MFR);

- The pace of job creation has slowed dramatically.

2004: 175,000/mo
2005: 165,000/mo
2006: 140,000/mo
Past five months: 119,000/mo 
(Steven A. Wood, Insight Economics)

- Manufacturing has lost more than three million jobs since 2000; Conditions remain poor;

- Prior recoveries at this point had created two million manufacturing jobs;

- Unemployment fell to 4.7 from 4.8% due to a large number of adults leaving the labor force (NiLF);

- The two-tiered labor market continues: The top quartile has it good; but for everyone else, the future is worrisome;

- For many workers, real incomes lag inflation;
(Peter Morici, Univ. of Maryland)

- Total labor input is growing very sluggishly in Q3, foreshadowing the continued softness in economic growth.
(Steven A. Wood, Insight Economics)

- The average work week is dropping (by 0.1 hours to 33.8 hours), even as productivity slows.

>
Want to have a clue as to how absurd things have gotten in the NFP land? Consider the recent discussions amongst the Dismal set as to how many jobs are needed just to keep up with population growth. Justin Lahart has the skinny in today’s Ahead of the Tape column:

"But there is a growing debate among economists about just how many
jobs the economy needs to produce. The old rule of thumb used to be
that the economy needed to produce as many as 180,000 jobs per month to
keep up with new entrants into the labor force. But the labor force
isn’t growing as fast as it used to — more people have gone back to
school, retired early, or just quit looking. As a result, economists at
the Kansas City Fed have argued only 120,000 jobs a month are needed to
create jobs for would-be workers. In a speech last week, Chicago Fed
President Michael Moskow put the number at 100,000."

Think about what that suggests as a population growth rate In a nation with 300 million people. Not only have the NiLFs — Labor Force dropouts — made the unemployment rate look better than it is, the same drop outs have convinced Fed Governors that less new hires are neccessary for "mere zero growth."

In other words, since the data isn’t there to support proof that we are merely treading water at best, then let’s change the basic requisites. I call that Moving the Goalposts.

This country is in for a very rude awakening.

<rant mode off>



>


Sources:
Nonfarm Payrolls Grow by 128,000;
Unemployment Rate Drops to 4.7%

CAMPION WALSH
WSJ, September 1, 2006 9:31 a.m.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB115706304364251038.html

Data Deluge
JUSTIN LAHART
AHEAD OF THE TAPE
WSJ, September 1, 2006; Page C1
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB115706978395751251.html

Steady, Modest Job-Growth Pace Points to Fed Pause This Month
Compiled by Tim Hanrahan
WSJ, September 1, 2006 10:34 a.m.
http://tinyurl.com/pj7jl

Category: Data Analysis, Economy, Employment

Brace Yourself: Its NFP Day!

Category: Data Analysis, Economy, Employment

Payroll Employment: The Home Game

Category: Data Analysis, Economy, Employment, Web/Tech

Category: Earnings, Economy, Employment, Inflation

The Fed on Productivity & Inflation

Category: Economy, Employment, Federal Reserve, Inflation

Economists Are Starting to Get a Clue

Category: Commodities, Economy, Employment, Real Estate

Some Interesting Employment Charts

Category: Employment

What are the Odds of a Recession?

Category: Economy, Employment, Federal Reserve, Investing, Markets, Psychology

Careful What You Wish For: Perhaps the Fed Should Raise After all

Category: Economy, Employment, Federal Reserve, Fixed Income/Interest Rates, Investing, Markets, Psychology

Category: Employment, Federal Reserve, Inflation, Investing, Markets, Psychology