The Other Side of Active ETFs: Follow the Money

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - April 21st, 2011, 11:45AM

Ari Weinberg is the WSJ Editor for Financial Tools; His perspective can also be seen on occasion at the Journal’s MarketBeat.

~~~

PIMCO made a big splash in the small world of actively-managed exchange-traded funds by filing for an ETF version of its Total Return Fund.

As many have accurately noted, PIMCO’s filing makes a statement to the traditional mutual fund world that Bill Gross, who has $236 billion at his command, isn’t afraid to disclose the daily positions and valuations for thousands of assets.

Gross doesn’t need to fear front runners in his market. He is the market. (ht @retheauditors)

While the PIMCO Total Return ETF will not be a share class of the larger fund – due to Vanguard’s patent on the hub-spoke share class structure – the fund will no doubt see a huge influx of cash to feed Gross’s Total Return replication.

This is where you need to follow the money.

First, it’s important to understand the business of regulated asset managers and mutual funds. Whether you like it or not, all asset managers are asset gatherers. They have to be to stay afloat and get to scale.

Hedge funds, or unregulated asset managers, have created a model in which they are paid partly for the assets they manage but mostly for the returns they generate above a benchmark.

Most regulated funds do not operate this way. The portfolio managers and the asset management companies divide the rents generated by the expense ratio. They make more money by generating returns which attract more assets. (Sure, they reduce the expense ratio as the fund gets bigger, but they’ll gladly take a smaller percentage of a bigger pie. The numbers still work out fine. Just ask Bill Gross.)

But Gross didn’t become a billionaire by simply running his actively managed mutual fund. He followed the money.

~~~

Continues at MarketBeat.

Barron’s: Buy Japan Now

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - March 19th, 2011, 7:14AM

Interesting cover on Barron’s this week:

This is hardly a contrary view — I’ve heard from lots of people saying they are doing the same thing.

As mentioned previously, stick with the small cap funds (DFJ, SCJ, and JSC). The large market cap ETF (EWJ) is not the ideal investment for the bounce back (already underway)

>

>
Source:
Invest in Japan
LESLIE P. NORTON
Barron’s MARCH 19, 2011
http://online.barrons.com/article/SB50001424052970203757604576204523501069008.html

Trading Japan’s EWJ

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - March 15th, 2011, 12:00PM

click for larger chart

Chart courtesy of FusionIQ, Bloomberg

>

I wanted to follow up a post from last year about EWJ. Back in December ’10, I mentioned 10 Reasons I Am Thinking About Japan. Regardless of your views going forward, if you owned or traded this, you should have had a plan in place, and executed your strategy on it.

I wrote than “Note how many times EWJ got turned back at $11. What would get me really excited was a high volume breakout over $10.90-11.”

EWJ did manage to get over $11, kissing $11.60 — but on rather mediocre volume.  If you were thinking about a big position, the lack of volume should have kept you small (or out altogether).

Regardless, you should have followed your discipline. It could have included such rules as:

• Buy the stock on a high volume breakout over $11 (1st chart here)
• Sell the stock when the uptrend is decisively broken (Red circle)
• Buy the stock when it falls back to support at $9 -9.50 (Green circle)

You will never know when an event(s) such as an Earthquake/Tsunami/Nuclear accident will occur, but you certainly can have a trading plan in place way before hand. Having a plan, and having the discipline to execute that plan is crucial to success as an investor or trader . . . .

And in ETF News

Email this post Print this post
By Invictus - December 22nd, 2010, 4:00AM

NEW YORK (Big Picture Exclusive) – Gargantuan money manager Blackrock reported on Friday that assets in U.S.-listed exchange-traded funds and exchange-traded products have surpassed the $1 trillion milestone for the first time.  Combined assets in U.S.-listed ETFs and ETPs reached $1.027 trillion late Thursday, BlackRock said. That includes 894 ETFs with assets of $887.2 billion from 28 providers on two exchanges and 185 ETPs with assets of $115.5 billion from 20 providers on one exchange, it said.

There is growing speculation surrounding what is believed to be the next breakthrough product in the ETF marketplace:  Single stock tracking ETFs.  Unlike their index-based cousins, these new single stock trackers would, as the name implies, track only a single stock, trade at exactly the same price as the stock to which they’re linked and consequently eliminate the need for single stock ownership.  A top executive with a money management firm who is familiar with his company’s plans to launch such a product and was granted anonymity so he could speak freely, put it this way:  “Think about the prospect of, say, a GE tracking ETF — an investor could capture over 99% of the movement of GE while simultaneously forfeiting any claim to a dividend and paying us up to35 basis points to manage the ETF.  What’s not to like?  We think this product paves the way for the ETF marketplace to collect its next trillion in assets.”

The Strange and Interesting History of the GLD ETF

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - November 26th, 2010, 11:30AM

I first recommended GLD on Power lunch back in 2005. The Gold ETF was under $50, and the rec was greeted with widespread skepticism. The basis for the call was the 1% rate level that had set off a spiral of inflation in everything priced in US dollars or credit.

But I had no idea at the time of the history of how GLD came about. Today’s WSJ uncovers the tenuous beginning of the world’s largest private owner of bullion.

Here’s the WSJ:

“The innovation that opened gold investing to the masses and helped spur this year’s record-breaking bull market was hatched in an act of desperation by a little-known gold-mining trade group.

The World Gold Council, created to promote gold, was fighting for survival. Its members—global gold-mining companies—were frustrated with the council’s inability to stem two decades of depressed prices and find buyers for a growing glut of the yellow metal. Eight years ago, they were considering withdrawing funding from the trade group, a move that would have effectively shut it down…

What the council eventually managed to create in those dark days surpassed its wildest dreams: SPDR Gold Shares, the exchange-traded fund launched in November 2004. The fund, known by its ticker symbol GLD, has ballooned into a $56.7 billion behemoth.”

The Journal tells the history of how the Gold Council launched the fumd, and the problems they had to overcome. Its well worth reading.

The one thing that I’d like to know about the various gold funds is how much physical Gold they own relative to paper gold, i.e., futures. Some estimates are that the demands on Gold relative to paper is a high multiple on the order of 100X. Does that mean the price is artificially juiced, or that demand outstrips supply? I’ve seen interesting arguments on both sides of the debate.

Here are some more GLD tidbits:

• The gold council spent $14 million developing the fund;

• GLD is the fastest-growing major investment fund ever.

• Asset value: $56.7 billion making it the 14th largest ETF.

• Revenue is a percentage of net asset value, set at 0.15%

• Its the world’s largest private owner of bullion

• GLD buys $30 million of gold daily

• All of the ETF bullion is stored in vaults in London

• GLD has now locked up nearly 1,300 metric tons of the world’s gold supply

• Estimate are gold-backed ETFs have added about $100 to $150 an ounce to the price of gold.

• Between 60% and 80% of GLD investors had never bought gold before;

>


click for larger graphic

>

Source:
Behind Gold’s New Glister: Miners’ Big Bet on a Fund
LIAM PLEVEN and CAROLYN CUI
WSJ, NOVEMBER 25, 2010
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703628204575618602535514506.html

ETF’s Firm Foundations

Email this post Print this post
By David Kotok - November 22nd, 2010, 5:30AM

ETF’s Firm Foundations by Matt Hougan
November 20, 2010
Matt Hougan

>

Matt Hougan is the President of ETF Analytics and the Global Head of Editorial for IndexUniverse. This is a guest column written by him in response to the recent negative press reports about ETFs.

~~~

Over the past few months, a series of poorly researched “white papers” have criticized exchange-traded funds and raised questions about the soundness of the ETF structure.

These papers—from the Kauffman Foundation, Bogan Associates, and others—center on three main assertions:

1) ETFs are fundamentally flawed and subject to collapse during stressful market conditions.

2) ETFs are a serious threat to market stability and are likely to cause future “flash crashes.”

3) ETFs are driving up the correlation between individual stocks, ruining price discovery in the markets, and thereby threatening capitalism as we know it.

All three assertions are false. They rest on a foundation of flawed logic, simple misunderstandings of ETF structures, and superficial research.

Despite transparent flaws, these arguments have received widespread media attention, from CNBC to the Financial Times. That’s a shame, because even a little bit of research could debunk the claims quickly.

Claim 1: ETFs Are Fundamentally Flawed and Could Collapse

The argument that ETFs could collapse was first advanced by a research outfit named Bogan Associates in a white paper published on September 15, 2010. It centers on the fact that many ETFs have high short interest, often many multiples of the number of shares outstanding.

The Bogan report focused on the SPDR S&P Retail ETF (NYSEArca: XRT), which at the time the report was written had over 500 percent short interest; in other words, each share in XRT had been sold short five times.

That sounds terrifying. How can an ETF have more shares sold short than exist in the first place? But it happens regularly with both stocks and ETFs, and it is both perfectly legal and safe.

Imagine that I own all of the shares of XRT. I want to earn a little extra money, so I lend them to you, for a fee, so that you can sell them short. You sell them to a guy named Bob. XRT has 100 percent short interest.

If Bob then lends them to someone else who sells short, the ETF now has 200 percent short interest. They may then lend the shares to another party, and so on.

Bogan’s particular concern with ETF short interest ties to one of the most important features of the ETF structure: the ability of large shareholders in the ETF to “redeem” shares back to the ETF issuer. If a large institution owns 50,000 shares of a fund like XRT, it can give them back to the ETF issuer and receive in exchange an equal value in the underlying stocks held in the ETF portfolio.

Bogan’s concern is that if even one-fifth of the people who bought XRT from short sellers redeem their shares, the ETF provider will be forced to hand out all the underlying securities in the fund. The fund will then be left holding nothing, and anyone who still has XRT in their portfolio will be left holding worthless paper.

It’s easy to see the concern. So easy, in fact, that the lawyers who designed ETFs put protections in place to guard against this situation. Those protections vary in detail but follow a similar form: When ETFs have high short interest, redeeming shareholders must prove they have clean, unencumbered ownership before a redemption is processed. This language exists in every prospectus I’ve looked at; the team at Bogan Associates either didn’t open a prospectus or was simply engaged in scare tactics.

The Kauffman report, published last week, took this mistaken concept and shoved it one tangled step further. Kauffman’s primary concern was that, during a market crisis, investors might place huge buy orders for an ETF, flooding it with cash. They suggested that the ETF issuer would then have to chase stocks, trying to put that cash to work. If the issuer couldn’t buy the shares, the ETF’s value would be in question.

Read the rest of this entry »

ETFs For a Brave New World

Email this post Print this post
By Cassandra Does Tokyo - September 15th, 2010, 3:30PM

Cassandra Does Tokyo is a former hedge fund manager and ex NY Trader, who is now living abroad.

~~~

ETFs clearly can provide some advantages for obtaining otherwise-expensive-to-obtain exposures for thematically-oriented investors. More noteworthy perhaps is the way that such vehicles have captured the imagination of Promoters and Managers as a salvation for otherwise stagnant revenue growth. This has lead to a proliferation of ever-more-focused ETFs to cater to the evolving fancies of investors looking for errrr… umm… something, indeed anything different. I would like to add my two-cents worth here and now, so BlackRock, take note: Here are some candidates for your marketing machine to focus on for the next decade:

Rent-Seeking ETF – While the maxim “Death and Taxes” is known to all, few realize that the original phrase was “Death, Taxes and Corruption”. Indeed Companies that purchase influence, contracts, and favorable legislation/regulation are worthy of investor attention (not because they are more dynamic, which they aren’t) but because they have a definable edge – something many others cannot boast about. Of course, ETF marketers would need to sanitize the pursuit into something like “Government Partnership Focused ETF” or

Gilded-Age ETF – Anyone who does their own shopping cannot ignore the the increasing gulf between winners and losers. As the a large portion of the former middle class sinks lower, a smaller but not reasonably-sized segment is promoted higher. This phenomena has meaningful effects ETF marketers can exploit as those companies focused upon the top-layer and growing underclass relatively prosper as the expense of the middle market. This ETF might have Whole Foods (WFMI) and Coach (COH) alongside pawnshops, check-cashing firms, pay-day loan enterprises and dollar discount stores.

Sin-City ETF – Booze, Cigarettes, Recre-ceuticals, Trans-Fats-In-A-Bag-To-Go, Espionage and surveillance equipment, Gambling, Porn, all in a neat little exchange-traded bundle. Reasonably recession-proof. High-profitability. Growing (except tobacco). Need I say more…?

Follow-The-Insider ETF – Alpha is getting harder to achieve these days. Covert insider-trading is getting riskier (just ask Raj!). But we know from some of the recent academic research that there is information contained in selective but systematically definable insider purchases and sales that yields abnormal excess returns. This is an easy one to flog, and panders to the twin pillar retail beliefs that “the market is rigged” and “it is nearly impossible for Average Joe to beat the market.

New Age ETF – Even tree-huggers have money to invest and would benefit from a convenient vehicle. And their numbers along with greater public awareness of what is environmentally good an bad, healthy or unhealthy, kharmically or spiritually desirable will make this a winner. The allure of this ETF is that it has many degrees of freedom in which to invest – from alternative energy, to agriculture and food science, from any company with sustainable approach to yoga-mat and acupuncture needle manufacturers. Build it (and advertise it convincingly) and they will come…

Bugger-The-Shorts ETF – This ETF, which will concentrate highly-shorted and crowded short stocks, may appeal to several classes of investor. First there are those that philosophically dislike the short side of the market – whether for moral or philosophical reasons. But there are also those devilish mischievous investors who can smell easy prey, and get sadistic pleasure out of squeezing weak (or system-driven) shorts out of their positions for fun and/or profit. This could potentially be popular with hedge funds as a way of quickly reversing exposure when they’ve been plunging themselves and find their positions on the wrong side of vicious pops so characteristic of bear-market rallies.

Activists Choice ETF – An ETF focusing on trumpted or reported positions disclosed by so-called activist investors are a so-called lay-up for ETF promoters. Primarily because activists themselves are such wonderful self-promoters, and quite adept at talking their own books. But also because they can tout “a hedge-fund strategy and performance without hedge fund fees” – always a winning slogan in the aggregation of retail funds.

Orlov’s ETF – With an increasing number of doomsdayers crawling out from all crevices, under the svengali-like piping of Glenn Beck, subscribing to Dimitry Orlov-like visions of the future, perhaps an ETF focused on a belief in the coming unravelling would sell well. Manufacturers of home generators, self-sufficiency tools, small arms and ammo, micro-water-purification systems, drought-resistant seeds, land-mines and barbed-wire, as well as gold-miners, and private prison and security services all could have a place in this portfolio. The only draw back is the non-sequitir if investors peer too far into the future where property rights and the financial system dissolve into complete chaos…

The “US Healthcare System Is The Best” ETF – Americans have a peculiar love affair with their Health Care system, irrespective of how completely buggered it is in comparison to the rest of the civilized (and much of the recently civilizing) world for the insured (as well as the uninsured, and financiers of both). ETF promoters can exploit this inexplicably visceral love-affair by helping them put their money where their mouth is, and creating the market-traded basket that invests a portfolio of companies prospering from a continuation of US Healthcare haplessness.

Greying Demographics ETF – Another obvious marketing target with many degrees of investment freedom, that are increasingly visible to investors. Motorized buggies, time-shares, home-health monitoring, nutraceuticals, senior-assisted living, bingo and slot-machine manufacturers, all in a single portfolio.

The Two-Cent Nickel ETF – Americans can rarely resist a bargain. As America slides closer to Japanification, ETF marketers might take a page from the Japanese Investment Trust playbook which for years has sported The Hidden Asset Trust or similar fund focusing upon companies with net substantial real assets well below market values, particularly where such assets are not reflected on the books of the company at current market values. Some of these assets are land, subsidiaries, other securities that provide seductive teasers to bargain-hunting investors. Of course, they must be careful not to rely too heavily upon Japanese experience for performance comparisons.

Fund of Fund of Hedge Funds ETF - The Coup de Grace offering must be the Fund of Hedge Fund-of-Funds to give the punter access to the broadest participation of hedge funds, something the small-punter has arguably had difficulty in obtaining. And in an exchange traded vehicle where they can dump their exposure at the first sign of distress. The remarkable attribute of this ETF (from the industry’s perspective) must be the multiple fee dollops that are removed from investors’ investments on a monthly basis. This is truly the ETF Triple Dip straight from the in the Wall Street’s finest creamery! But even better for the true skeptics, I know that you are thinking more like John Paulson, so if only someone (Hello GS!) can create for us a synthetic version of this that we can short, we too might find a good way to participate in the fee bonanza.

Of course, this is by no means an exhaustive list, as I am certain to have left some other crumbs on the table, so please feel free to submit your own additions.

~~~

Originally published at Cassandra Does Tokyo

Beware Leveraged ETF Slippage

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - August 23rd, 2010, 8:30PM

Good article from Bob O’Brien in Barron’s warning about the dangers of 2X Short funds: Beware of Leveraged Short ETFs.

Its not just the short leveraged ETFs, its all of the leveraged ETFs that have the same slippage characteristic over time.

As anyone who has ever traded them can tell you, they fail to track their benchmark dollar for dollar. This is because they use futures contracts and swaps, and are reset each day. The slippage from their targets us anywhere from 200 to 500 basis points — the longer the time held, the greater the potential slippage. (We use the 2 for 1 leveraged ETFs, both long and short).

Barron’s:

“These short ETF funds – and there are 39 of them available – afford investors the opportunity to capitalize on a market decline in a relatively inexpensive, accessible fashion. Like all ETFs, these products are listed, so they trade like stocks. Their associated fees are half – or less – than the cost of comparable mutual funds. And because many of these products use leverage – mainly through the use of swaps – investors can effectively double or triple their exposure to a market decline at no additional cost or risk.

So if you’re betting that the market is going to fall, leveraged short ETFs have a lot of appeal, at least conceptually.

Their performance in the last three months testifies to that appeal. Since the S&P 500 topped out this year on April 23rd, the ProShares UltraShort S&P 500 has gained 20%. By comparison, the S&P 500 itself has lost 12%.”

Note that the ProShares UltraShort S&P 500 (SDS) has about $3.7 billion of AUM, and is the most popular ETF of its kind . . .

>

Source:
Beware of Leveraged Short ETFs
Bob O’Brien
Barron’s AUGUST 23, 2010
http://online.barrons.com/article/SB50001424052970203534304575441874200791144.html

ETFs: “F” for Liquidity

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - June 6th, 2010, 8:00AM

A very interesting article in Barrons about the role ETFs — Extremely Troublesome Funds — played in the May 6th flash crash. It seemed the usual liquid, widely traded funds had a sudden and unexpected vulnerability, as liquidity dropped steeply, and bids faded away.

“ETFs represented 70%, or 227, of the 326 securities for which trades were cancelled by the exchanges, owing to a price drop of 60% or more, according to a recent joint report issued by the SEC and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. That was after many exchange-traded funds lost ground, along with stocks, earlier in the day because of the problems in Europe caused by Greece.

Investment Technology Group, an electronic broker and tech firm, says that, at the height of the flash crash, the returns of some ETFs decoupled from the underlying basket of stocks that they track. Some underperformed the underlying portfolios by more than 60% . . .

So how bad is the damage to the reputation of exchange-traded funds? Consider some ETF trading details:

• The ETF sector saw net inflows last month of $6.3 billion, half of April’s $12.7 billion.
• Total ETF assets fell to $798.4 billion on May 31, from $847.4 billion a month earlier.
• Biggest loser was PowerShares QQQ (QQQQ), the Nasdaq 100 ETF, which suffered worst-in-show outflows of $2.4 billion, lowering its assets to $18.4 billion.
•  SPDR Gold Shares ETF (GLD) gained $4.2 billion in assets last month total = $49.2 billion).
• Pimco’s Enhanced Short Maturity Strategy Fund (MINT), an actively managed money-market proxy pulled in $596.4 million. (total assets = $1.55 billion; a 50% increase over April’s total)
• Pimco now is the 15th-biggest ETF firm, up from 19th in April.
• Vanguard gained $2.49 billion in net assets (total = $103.1 billion) they are third in total assets.
• MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) added $2 billion of assets (total = $23.94 billion, 5th-biggest U.S. ETF).
• BlackRock (BLK), iShares’ parent, saw redemptions of $1.3 billion in May (Total = $368.24 billion in assets; #1 in the exchange-traded fund world).

Interesting stuff . . .

>

Source:
ETFs Get an “F” for May 6 Liquidity
TOM SULLIVAN
Barron’s June 5, 2010
http://online.barrons.com/article/SB127569190243001179.html

53 queries. 0.491 seconds.