A Correlation Worth Noting?

Email this post Print this post
By Invictus - February 13th, 2012, 12:30PM

>

The folks at the St. Louis Fed – about whom I can’t say enough good things — produce a proprietary Financial Stress Index, a full explanation of which can be found here [PDF].

A full deconstruction of the Index is, frankly, a bit above my pay grade.  What’s not, though, is exploring the correlation of the Index to the S&P500 and discovering that while it’s generally well-correlated, that correlation has increased dramatically since the recession began at the end of 2007, as can easily be seen in the chart above.  (I’ve inverted the S&P500 to better display the correlation.)

The question I need to explore, of course, is whether — or how — this information might be useful in the context of equity exposure.

Note that the Index can dip below zero, and that it is still well off its lows.  Should “financial stress” continue to ease — the Index is updated weekly — it would suggest to me more S&P upside.  The biggest caveat, of course, is that all correlations work — until they don’t.

>

BR: I would add that peaks in economic activity precede recessions — they start with economic stress rather low. So if we extrapolate from the (very limited data) above, we still have 12-24 months before the real heavy stuff starts coming down.

That said, 2 is not a statistically significant sample

Updating Stock Market Rallies Since 1900

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - February 13th, 2012, 11:00AM

Over the weekend, I showed a Chart of the Day depicting all of the major rallies since 1900.

A sharp eyed reader pointed out that the author of this particular chart dated the beginning of this rally as October 2011, rather than March 2009.

Below you will find my corrected version, with the markets up approximately 98% going on 720 or so trading days. (my changes should be pretty obvious)

>

>

Chart of the Day responds to our questions, noting:

“Each of the rallies displayed on the chart followed a major Dow correction with a major Dow correction being defined as a decline of 15% or more. By that definition, the last Dow correction ended on October 3, 2011 with a decline of 16.8%. When compared to the latest major Dow correction, there were several relatively recent corrections that were shorter in duration (e.g. 1987 & 1990) and as for magnitude – the 1983-84 correction was similar with a decline of 15.6%.”

I’d like to see the same chart controlled for 20% and 30% corrections.

Why I Wouldn’t Invest in Banks: The Return of Exposure to Off balance Sheet Securitizations

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - February 10th, 2012, 8:30AM

Manal Mehta is a Banking & Finance analyst with Branch Hill Capital; contact him at manal@branchhillcapital.com.

Why I Wouldn’t Invest in Banks: The Return of Exposure to Off balance Sheet Securitizations

>

Why I Wouldn’t Invest in Banks by Manal Mehta

Investing in Foreclosures: How One Company Does It

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - February 6th, 2012, 1:30PM

Buying foreclosures to turn them into rental properties is tricky business. Mack Companies, a Chicago real-estate firm, invests in about one out of every 40 homes it inspects. MarketWatch’s Amy Hoak looks at why some make the cut and others don’t.


Feb. 3, 2012

Magazine Cover Indicator: New York “End of Wall Street”

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - February 6th, 2012, 10:38AM

This week’s New York magazine — a non Business publication — has a rather bearish cover discussing “The Emasculation of Wall Street.

Last week, I mentioned the Barron’s cover was somewhat bullish, with the caveat that Barron’s is a business weekly. New York magazine is more general interest — its not Time or Newsweek, because it covers Wall Street in its back yard.

Meanwhile, Bloomberg is out with this headline today: Investors Fearful as Stock Rally Best Since 1987.

Still, I suspect the NY Mag cover is a bullish sentiment indicator.

>

Source:
The End of Wall Street As They Knew It
Gabriel Sherman
NY, Feb 5, 2012
http://nymag.com/print/?/news/features/wall-street-2012-2/

IPOs: From Netscape To Facebook

Email this post Print this post
By Anna W - February 3rd, 2012, 12:30PM

In case you were unaware, IPOs are terrible investments — at least most of the time. The lottery ticket dreams keeps hope alive that this next one is going to be a giant winner.

Hopes are pinned on the giant Facebook IPO, coming out at an expected 100 X earnings and 30 X revenue. Its going to take extrordinary growth to justify those prices, especially for people who buy stock in the open market at higher than IPO prices.

>

Click to enlarge:

Source: NYT

Germany’s policy prescription re the Euro Zone is (quite rightly) being questioned

Email this post Print this post
By Kiron Sarkar - February 2nd, 2012, 5:16AM

A number of you think I have been transformed into a raging bull. I certainly have not. It is just that I remember the lessons of 2009, when the FED and other Central Banks flooded the system with liquidity. Markets rose, irrespective of the fundamental data.

The same is happening in Europe at present, following the ECB’s LTRO – a REAL GAME CHANGER, as I keep banging on and on and………. I expect the next LTRO to be taken up even more so than previously. The key is that there is little, if any, stigma attached for banks to participate. Indeed, if I was a shareholder of a bank that did not take up as much as possible, I would be thoroughly annoyed, to put it mildly. The other issue that Ulick – my very clued up friend from Credit Suisse – points out that confidence is rising – BULLISH and funds are SERIOUSLY UNDER INVESTED, particularly in the FINANCIALS.

The Euro Zone remains a basket case. It will be in recession this year (including Italy and Spain). France halved its GDP forecast to just +0.5% and whilst German GDP has held up, a recent slowdown in domestic consumption (OK, just 1 months numbers) suggest that German forecasts of +0.75% for the current year seem optimistic, given declining exports. Belgium, thought to be representative of the Euro Zone, is in recession, for example.

Germany does want to be responsible for the profligate members of the Euro Zone – I totally both understand and, indeed, agree. However, to impose the tough fiscal measures at this time is pure madness. To (solely) pander to their electorate, whilst ignoring the consequences (including to themselves – which is exactly what Merkel is doing) is suicidal. It would be far better for Germany’s leaders to educate their population, rather than indulge in these suicidal policies. Martin Wolf of the FT wrote an excellent article on this point yesterday – a must read.

The good news is that countries and the IMF (Lagarde) are (openly) beginning to question the Germany policy/prescription. By the way, Euro Zone political leaders are (openly) ridiculing the recent fiscal compact that the Euro Zone signed up to. I suspect that we all agree that we have had more than enough of the Greeks – they will never comply and just want more and more handouts. Personally, the sooner they exit the Euro, the better. Providing additional funding is a complete waste of money. The argument goes that unless Greece is bailed out, contagion will spread to other countries. Yes, but, I am increasingly of the view that this may not necessarily be the case for any length of time.

We all know that Portugal cannot survive with their current debt load. A 40%+ haircut is INEVITABLE. Better to deal with this and to stop contagion spreading to Italy and Spain, rather than throwing good money after bad (especially as resources are limited) by propping up Greece, which will inevitably default. Are there the tools to do this. Well, the impact of the LTRO has been far, far greater than virtually everyone (including myself) expected – the ECB could lengthen the maturity of the loans to say 5 years, from the current 3 years and cut interest rates further. In addition, it looks (at present) as if the IMF will raise more funds for bail outs and Germany (Schaeuble) has hinted that a larger ESM may be possible – hopefully with the funds going to others ex Greece.

To date the EU/Germany have used the stick approach. A carrot is also very much needed. For example, why not reduce the debt of the peripherals, if they comply with some SENSIBLE fiscal targets and, in addition, introduce much needed structural reforms. The ECB could, for example, transfer its holdings of bonds to the EFSF/ESM at their purchase price, who could then “sell” them back to the respective peripheral countries at the same price,(if they comply with their fiscal targets and introduce much needed structural reforms – the real key) – effectively reducing the debt of the relevant country. I understand why the ECB would not be willing to do this themselves, as it could be argued that it will embroil itself in fiscal policy. Furthermore, a reduction in the overall level of debt of the peripheral Euro Zone countries will clearly reduce the yields on their debt even further – a significant benefit.

Yesterday’s Chinese PMI data was greeted by euphoria by many. However, I would advise that you really analyse this number. Chinese watchers advise me that the numbers were “adjusted” to reflect the early Chinese New Year – I’m in a happy mood following the recent wedding I attended, so I will stick to “adjusted” when describing Chinese data.

Personally, ex geo political issues (of which there are many and, unfortunately, continue to increase), I believe this rally has legs.

The rally in the financials continue – I added Man Group (Ticker EMG) and Bank of Ireland (small – Ticker BKIR) yesterday, in addition to BARC, LLOY, RBS, PRU, AV, for full disclosure purposes. I suspect a number of you will question (I’m being polite) the wisdom of buying Bank of Ireland. Well, I can understand, but for the reasons mentioned above, personally, I believe it’s worth a small investment.

As a number of you will think I’m totally crazy, insane, lost it completely etc, etc,so I wont talk about possibly buying medium/longer term Portuguese debt !!!! However (I cant resist), let me just say that even a 50% haircut (reducing debt to GDP to 50%) would imply a 7.5%+ yield on the 10 year Portuguese bonds.

The BoE may well announce additional QE shortly – at least Sterling 50bn, but more likely Sterling 75bn+. We know that the FED will introduce QE3, if there is any weakness and that it intends to hold interest rates low into 2014.

If you look at the actual data, its just awful. However, in 2009, I discovered that markets look at things differently.

I still expect markets to decline following a Greek default in the 1stQ (2nd Q at the latest). However, I believe that markets will RECOVER faster than most think.

Kung Hei Fat Choi, by the way.

Back to the normal blog format next week – have not fully caught up with all the data.
,
Starting to seriously research Japan – looking TOTALLY, ABSOLUTELY, FUNDAMENTALLY, AWFUL – and I’m being polite. Why the Yen remains at these levels remains a complete mystery to me. More rhetoric from the Japanese re the Yen – will they intervene – most suggest not, but………

The A$ at US$1.07+. Totally amazing – looking to short at some stage + the miners, though “risk on” means that the miners react positively. Glencore/Xstrata merger could well help the sector – Glencore up over 5.0% in Hong Kong trading.

Gold at US$1750 !!!! – I really wish I could understand.

Spot Brent around US$111.50 – once again, I don’t understand.

Euro climbing up to near US$1.32 – again, amazing.

Just heard that the Spanish bank BBVA has reported the 1st ever loss – whilst a loss was expected, the actual number was larger than forecast.

I will bang on yet again – SPAIN IS IN FAR, FAR, FAR…. WORSE SHAPE THAN ITALY.

Deutsche bank has also disappointed – a big miss – profits declined 77%.

Asian markets are over 1.0% higher in the main and European futures suggest a higher opening.

Thanks for all your very kind comments – will respond over the weekend.

Why the Fed Trumps Weakening Economy

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - February 1st, 2012, 10:53AM

Here’s my (2nd) Yahoo Finance video from yesterday:
>
Click for video

>
First video is here A Housing Bottom Is Nowhere In Sight; there’s a nother in the queue

Ritholtz: Economy’s Lousy, But US Stocks Still Look Good

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - February 1st, 2012, 9:34AM

Yesterday morning (January 31, 2012), I recorded this video with Yahoo Daily Ticker:

>

Source: Barry Ritholtz: Yes, The Economy’s Lousy, But Stocks Still Look Good

2011 Investment Mea Culpas

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - January 31st, 2012, 7:30AM

January is nearly over, so it is once again time to look at the various errors, mistakes and bad calls that I made in the asset management business in 2011. I have made ‘fessing up part of my process – this is my third annual version (see my previous mea culpas for 2009 and 2010). I have made this an annual rite of contrition. Each January, I set down on paper my Mea Culpas – owning up to the errors, mistakes and failures that are a regular part of the investing process.

For most money managers, 2011 was a challenging year. But I am less concerned with under-performance as a Mea Culpa, choosing instead to focus on the process (for the record, we outperformed our benchmark, and did so with considerably less risk).

First the good news: Assessing what did right in 2011, there were plenty of things to be pleased with: The Macro calls worked well, we stuck to our discipline. We avoided the entire August collapse. Buying into the breakout in October, we quickly reversed ourselves when it failed. And when the signs were to go long and strong to start the year, I held my nose and did so.

As always, in the business of managing assets, there is always something new to learn. This morning, I want to look not at what I got right, but rather what I did wrong, where there is room for improvement. We will also revisit prior mea culpas to see where we have been fortunate to improve as a result of these annual lists.

Let’s have at it:

1. Running Assets vs. Managing a Business: It may be obvious, but these are two very different skill sets. I first mentioned this last year – and though these are supposed to be mea culpas, I have to give kudos to a pair of outstanding hires: Josh and Anna. They make me better, and for that I am grateful.

Possible solution: Learning to be a business manager versus an asset manager means reaching outside your comfort zone, educating yourself, pushing into new areas. But the key: Find more outstanding people and hire them.

2. Confirmation Bias: I find myself reading more of the analysts whose current views I agree with and less of those whose views are opposite my own. Off the top of my head: Laksman Athushan, Jim Bianco, Michael Belkin and John Hussman. I need to find people whose macro views differ from mine as well as those whose market perspective is more aggressive than my own.

Possible solution: Read more of the folks I occasionally disagree with like Doug Kass, David Rosenberg, and others. Worry less about hunting for that nugget of info and more on the process others employ to challenge my own views.

3. Articulate policy and principles: I have a pretty firm set of beliefs when it comes to investing (seen in about 6,000 posts on the blog), but I have yet to put it down in a short format. This is a function of laziness and fear of ridicule.

Possible solution: DO IT. Break the beliefs down into 10 key principles, post them somewhere, and review annually. Forget about the opinions of the public and focus on what matters most to yourself and your process.

4. Skepticism: I tend to disbelieve/distrust/ignore new sources of info. I have begun to grow cynical. This has led to unfairly dismissing new sources  of information/analysis/commentary. The secret to being skeptical — and to Sturgeons Law — is to not reject 100% of everything that comes your way, just the 95% that is crap.

Possible solution: Consider the what ifs before rejecting something. Might this analyst be correct? Might their process work out? Be more generous with your attitude rather than being so dismissive.

5. Communication: A new issue for me, as I added lots more individual clients. I was very inefficient when I came to communicating with both new and prospective clients. Its not that I didn’t communicate; rather, it was haphazard and disorganized. Too many phone calls, too many calendar conflicts.

Possible solution: Organize: Create a system of communication to both existing and prospective clients. Use technology, conference calls, webinars to reach people in a more efficient way.

6. Time Management: An annual issue, although I did get better at it this year (see #1 above). Focus more on research, writing, and asset management –let the rest come to you.

Possible solution: Prioritize: Do less of what matters least; Work with a daily checklist to make sure things get finished; Focus.

7. Clients: It is always a balancing act when dealing with clients. On the one hand, you cannot blow them off when they bring you concerns (its their money!). On the other hand, you cannot allow the investing public’s group mentality (or panic) to infect you. Further, we took some heat for calls that turned out to be correct, but in a few cases, took steps at the request of clients that lowered overall performance; that must stop.

Possible solution: Be proactive. Improve regular communication with all clients; Work on making sure they understand the process, our current thoughts, and where we are so as to avoid the 2nd guessing. Preempt the “My way or the highway” conversation proactively;

8. Undercapitalized: I worked on several projects where capital was a major issue. This is something that is singularly important to any new entity. The bootstrapping approach seems to work in very rare circumstances where there is an immediate influx of revenue, but for moist start ups, it’s a pipedream. You cannot grow a business when the daily focus is raising money.

Possible solution: Steer away from firms that have too little capital. Make sure that the structure is appropriate. Avoid the classic undercapitalized but over enthusiastic founders.

~~~

Follow up from prior year’s Mea Culpas

1. Too Many Equity Mutual Funds: I have always known mutual funds were a mixed bag, and last year, I finally did something about it: In my asset allocation model, I slowly replaced mutual funds with ETFs. A portfolio I took over began with 8 funds and 2 ETFs; that raio is now reversed.

Actual solution: Used more ETFs more to increase exposure quickly so we carry less cash sooner and raise exposure more quickly; Better to own positions with tight stops, or to own half positions, than none at all;

2. Putting Cash to work: Despite making the right call in early March, we legged in slowly. I am not suggesting that you go all in on a single day or week, but the process of going from 80% cash to fully invested took longer than it should have. Directly related to the two points above, when the market is rallying aggressively, we need to carry less cash sooner and more exposure more quickly;

Actual solution: iShares Barclays 1-3 Year Treasury Bond Fund – rather than sit with a 40% cash position – even for a month – the 1-3 year yields something, and if we are right on why we moved to cash, may even appreciate.

3. Focus!: We all have many items calling out for our attention; but having too much on your plate means things fall through the cracks (like that option trade!). Our modern short attention span society has the appearance of being more productive, but probably isn’t. Free association is great for creative brainstorming sessions, but winging it during execution means stuff is going to slide.

Actual solution: The checklist! When I stick to my TTD, I can be wonderfully productive. Must stay with that in 2010.

4. Health: After years of neglect, I promised myself that when I turned 50, I would start taking better care of myself. Your body is a used car, and if you want to get to 150,000 miles, you need to do more than put in petrol. (I was embarrassed to put this down as a mea culpa last year).

Actual solution: Went for my first check up in years. (Blood Pressure/Cholesterol are excellent)  On a diet, going to the gym, running again. Colonoscopy scheduled for the Spring. Now the trick is to trick to it.

~~~

As always, ideas, suggestions, and hints for improving are always welcome!

48 queries. 0.358 seconds.