Posts filed under “Media”

Chart of the Week: % of Nasdaq issues at 30 day highs

The Nasdaq bounced off its 50 day moving average, but has failed to make a new high, while the Dow and the S&P500 have each hit new rally highs. Momentum is somewhat deteriorating on the NASDAQ, even though trend is still up.

% of Nasdaq issues at 30 day highs
_nasdaq_stocks_making_new_30_day_highs.bmp
Source: Technimentals

Technimental’s Kevin Lane notes “There is a clear line in the sand at the 2,000 level, a close below this support area, given the fact momentum already is in a weakened state, would create the long awaited corrective wave. Remember however, this idea is off the table as long as we stay above these supports levels.”

Random Items:
Greenspan’s Deep Job Analysis Affects Policy
The unemployment rate is only the beginning of the problem
Coming Soon: $3 per gallon gasoline?
Big and Bad
Search For Tomorrow
View From the Right: Tax Increases Ahead

Quote of the Day
“I’m not advocating tax increases, I’m predicting them.”
-Bruce Bartlett , Senior Policy Analyst for President Reagan

Category: Finance, Media

Media Appearence

Category: Media

Time: Not on the Recording Industry’s Side II

Category: Current Affairs, Film, Finance, Media, Music, Sports, Television

It’s not whether the Medals matter or not

NYT_home_banner.gif

Today’s New York Times has an OpEd titled “The Medals Don’t Matter.” It’s by Jake Tapper, who is a well regarded ABC News Correspondent (formerly of Salon). The article reaches the conclusion that voters do not care about the military service of their Presidential candidates.

To reach this feat of logical deduction, Jake focused primarily on the 1992, 1996 and 2000 Presidential elections (and the 2000 GOP primary), and the Military Service of each candidate.

There are many, many analytical errors in his approach, sample size being the most obvious. But let’s focus instead on a very common logic error which seems to catch most people unaware:

Controlling for a single variable instead of many when analyzing complex systems.

I would be oversimplifying the situation were I to call this error, well, a mere oversimplification. But that’s what lay at the heart of this fallacy: Taking an extremely complex and dynamic issue — who won the Presidency and why — and then boiling it down to a single, and in this small sample, mostly minor issue. The author might as well have based it upon how many letters were in the men’s first and last names.

Presidential victories are the result of a far more nuanced and multi-faceted set of factors. This issue deserves to be examined in far greater depth . . .

Read More

Category: Media, Politics, War/Defense

Read it here first: Earnings vs the market

Category: Finance, Media

Hangin’ out with Steve Forbes

Category: Media

Forbes on Fox

Category: Media

Pixaren’t

Category: Finance, Media

The Definitive Disney Dissing

Category: Film, Finance, Media

Greenspan Goes to Disneyland!

Category: Finance, Media, Politics