Posts filed under “Think Tank”
Stocks rallied early and bonds sank on Tuesday on expectation that the release of GDP today would show a better than consensus number. The peculiarity of trade accounting mandates that GDP will be revised higher due to declining imports, which actually indicate economic ebbing.
Stocks tried to conform to the pattern of rallying into FOMC soirees. This suggests a reversal today after the Communiqué is released – unless it contains unexpected bullish news…Because bonds are tanking, we wonder if the Fed will announce an increase in its $300B monetization plan. It would please Bill Gross.
The window for stocks to rally is closing. The most bullish seasonal, the propensity of stocks to rally from November 1 to April 30 (particularly small caps and tech), ends on Thursday. The short-term upward seasonal bias (end-of-month & start-of-month) ends on Friday.
Technical indicators on stocks and major indices are negative or rolling over because the momentum of the rally that commenced in mid-March has dissipated and volume remains soft…Banks, abetted by FASB accounting changes and other facilities, are issuing beaucoup securities. The Treasury is issuing like crazy and the May refunding looms…Insider selling is exploding.
30-year bond continuous future – The Fed better have a scheme to remedy this dire looking chart.
More for today – GDP (-4.7% is consensus but the market expects a sharply higher revision) will impact early trading. As usual, traders will have a knee-jerk reaction to the headline number. But one must scrutinize the details of the report to gauge ‘real’ activity…Analysts expect a sharp upward revision due to lower imports, which actually indicates economic weakness…Government spending should be a factor.
Category: Think Tank
As the FOMC meets for a 2nd day, they will likely take comfort in what has occurred since their last meeting where they took the daring move of deciding to buy treasuries to manipulate the level of longer term interest rates. After rallying $70 the day of that meeting, gold has given it all back,…Read More
Good Evening: Multiple crosscurrents prevented stocks from making much headway in either direction today, with the major averages finishing appropriately mixed on light volume. Negative stories about the banks and their impending need to raise capital clashed with positive surprises from today’s economic data releases. Given that the banks have been the leaders in both…Read More
While commodity prices have sold off the past 2 days due to concerns with the impact that swine flu will have on global growth, the implied inflation rate in the 10 yr TIPS today has risen to the highest level since early Oct at 1.51%. The dynamics impacting the bond market remain the concerns with…Read More
One more bubble, please.
After the bubbles in technology, housing, and commodities, we saw the mother of all bubbles: the one in global liquidity. The world economy seemed to require bubbles for its continued functioning.
I get the distinct feeling that investors’ prayers are now being answered: There’s a new bubble now – or an old one is being re-inflated, depending on your perspective even as I type this. I’d like to call it the Troubled China Revival Program (TCRP).
Why start reserving bubble-naming rights? Well, I recently received an email from a friend that had the following subject line: “China … Record Loan Addition, Record Money Supply, Record Auto Sales, Record Imports of Copper, Iron Ore, and Coal, Strong Property Sales.”
I checked every figure (the hyperlinks above are mine), and every single one checked out. I couldn’t quite believe what I was reading. I had thought China was in a spiraling-down recession. But even the decline in electricity consumption — a true gauge of economic growth — decelerated from 3.7% in January and February to a mere 0.7% in March. (Take a look at the FXI for more.)
So is China really the first nation to rebound? Is this the first sign of a rebounding global economy?
I’m sorry to say that the answer to both questions is no.
Category: Think Tank
The April Conference Board Consumer Confidence # was a much better than expected 39.2, almost 10 pts better than forecasted and up from a revised 26.9 in March. It’s the highest level since Nov ’08 and the questionnaire was likely filled out a few weeks ago but definitely reflects the sense of a slowdown in…Read More
The Feb S&P/CaseShiller 20 city home price index fell 18.63% y/o/y, a touch better than expected but with a slight downward revision to Jan to a fall of 19%. The index is now down 30.7% from its record high in July ’06. Both on a m/o/m and y/o/y basis, all 20 cities saw declines. The…Read More
Dan Greenhaus is at the Equity Strategy Group at Miller Tabak + Co. where he covers markets and portfolio theory. He has contributed several chapters to Investing From the Top Down: A Macro Approach to Capital Markets (by Anthony Crescenzi).
This is his most recent commentary:
Tuesday: ACE, AVY, BEC, BMY, CCE, CPO, CVH, DB, DIN, BEN, HL, HERO, HMC, JEC, LVLT, MEE, MBHI, ODP, PCAR, PNRA, PFE, PSYS, RFMD, COL, RTI, JAVA, TLAB, IPG, MHP, SMG, UA, X, VFC, WAT
The news this morning is absolutely unequivocally making my point about the banks. On the one hand, you have reports that the government is apparently going to have C and BAC raise billions more in capital in order to increase their capital base. We know the private market is not going to come forward with the necessary money, not all of it at least, and as a result the government is going to have to plug the holes with additional capital. With preferred to common conversions all but assured, I maintain my belief that Citi emerges from this situation as a fully functioning arm of the federal government. BAC is probably not far behind but this is only one side of the debate. On the other hand, you have NTRS announcing that they are planning on raising more than one billion dollars in order to help repay the TARP injection. NTRS follows other banks including GS and JPM in laying the groundwork for TARP repayment. The specifics of the sale do not matter for this discussion but rather we need only focus on the intention. GS, JPM and NTRS are healthy banks. We knew this and we know this. C and BAC are unhealthy banks. We knew this and we know this. Creditors know this. Depositors (I hope) know this. The returning of TARP funds by any of the aforementioned banks does not in any way draw attention to less healthy banks in terms of making people aware they are unhealthy. This is not October. This is April and the amount of information we have now compared to October is significantly larger. There are, of course, broader questions about the health of the overall banking sector and the economy at large. NPA are up, loan loss reserves are increasing and credit deterioration is an ongoing battle but the fact remains that if you are GS, why should you be subject to an intrusive and draconian Congress simply because of mismanagement at other institutions? The answer is you shouldn’t.
Category: Think Tank
After having to get an advanced degree over the past year in political science to better understand the US Govt’s desire to encroach to an extraordinary extent in private business (they’ll own 50% of GM if bondholders agree, BoA is on the chopping block to convert govt preferred stock to common and will join Citi…Read More
Good Evening: The major U.S. stock market averages declined on light volume today, and an outbreak of a new strain of swine flu was deemed the primary culprit. Upon closer inspection, however, it seems as if the sloppy — even hoggish — bank lending practices of the previous up cycle are as much to blame…Read More