Posts filed under “Wages & Income”
This chart, from a Reuters’ analysis of pay at the 18 biggest banks by market value, illustrates the massive differences in pay among the CEOs of the world’s top banks. The compensation of the CEOs of the largest U.S. banks towers above what’s paid to banking chiefs in other parts of the world.
Ever wonder why Goldman execs don’t speak to mere mortals? The answer was hidden in a tongue-in-cheek Michael Lewis Bloomberg column, which he slipped this by everyone late night Friday. Its an internal memo to Lloyd Bankfein, chock full of suggestions to improve GS’ public image. This one was my favorite: Each year, for example,…Read More
I stumbled across a fascinating pierce of research (via a reader) regarding misaligned pay incentives Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers: “The standard narrative of the meltdown of Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers assumes that the wealth of the top executives of these firms was largely wiped out along with their firms. In the ongoing debate…Read More
Today’s NYT magazine has a long, well done interesting piece on Kenneth Feinberg, the government’s special master for executive compensation, titled What’s a Bailed-Out Banker Really Worth?. Anytime I read a discussion on compensation, bonuses, and bailouts, I am astonished as to how much of the general discontent over these issues traces back to the…Read More
Distinguished law scholar Elizabeth Warren teaches contract law, bankruptcy, and commercial law at Harvard Law School. She is an outspoken critic of America’s credit economy, which she has linked to the continuing rise in bankruptcy among the middle-class.
Mike Santoli has an interesting perspective on the furious reactions to Goldie’s bonuses in this week’s Barron’s: “Absent in the rage against people earning impressive pay after their firms got public help is the key question: Do we want the firms that received aid to continue operating as autonomous, profit-seeking businesses, or as quasi-utilities operating…Read More
Its time for the quarterly hand-wringing amongst the populace regarding the over-sized bonuses at Goldman Sachs. This Q, its a mere $23B.
The focus on the bonuses of top performing traders and investment bankers is misplaced. There are many, many things to be upset about regarding the financial sector — but bonuses are not one of them. [BR: Or, at least not the most important thing to be enraged over]
We live in a capitalist system, where there are going to be winners and losers. Its not fair, but it is how it is. You can complain about it, but it is all but pointless. Feel free to pursue a millionaire’s tax of 1% (or 10%) on everyone who earns more than $1m — a super top tier — to pay for health care reform or whatever you want. (Best of luck with that!)
Every few years, we lament overpaid athletes, musicians, movie stars. Bruce Springsteen is going to make $100 million+ this year on tour. While you can complain about it, ask yourself how many people can fill 50,000 seat arenas 200 night a year at $100 a pop. Lebron James, Peyton Manning, and others justify their salaries by generating massive revenue and profits for their employers.
So too it is with Goldman Sachs and others.
The traders who throw off the most profits, the bankers that generate the most lucrative deals are worth tens of millions to their “team owners.” That is how it is, and it is unlikely to ever change.
What should you be upset about?
• Paying people in year one for risks that last years or decades;
• The “privatized gains, socialized losses” of the current system;
• Dramatically reduced competition in the Banking sector;
• The idea that “Too Big To Fail” is now an official policy of the United States;
• The “gifting” of $100s of billions of dollars to mismanaged banks that should have been allowed to fail in a controlled fashion;
• Bank lobbyists preventing any sort of credible regulation from passing;
• Goldman Sachs wresting $19 billion from AIG;
• The absurd and poorly thought out $750 billion TARP plan;
• The suspension of mark-to-market allowing banks to hide losses and not accurately disclose their bad assets;
• The outsized influence Banks have on Congress and Goldman Sachs has within the Executive branch.
There are plenty of things to be upset about these days. Top performers earning huge paydays at the biggest firms is not one of them . . .
Looking at Wall Street Pay (August 1st, 2009)
Why Financial Reform Died: “Banks Run Congress” (October 12th, 2009)
What’s Wrong With Billionaire Fund Managers? (April 16th, 2008)
I love the smell of napalm in the morning. You know, one time we had a hill bombed, for 12 hours. When it was all over, I walked up. We didn’t find one of ‘em, not one stinkin’ dink body. The smell, you know that gasoline smell, the whole hill. Smelled like [sniffing, pondering] victory….Read More
Are stocks cheap or expensive? Are wages up or down? The answer to the above question is obviously a a function of both hourly wages and S&P prices. Note that in the early 1980s, you could by the SPX with under 20 hours of labor — Stocks were cheap then. In the late 1990s, it…Read More