Existing Homes Sales Fall; NAR seeks a PhD in Absurdism

"Existing-home sales slowed in April, partly because restrictive lending practices hampered home buyers. At the same time, more areas are showing gains, and a reversal in mortgage policy means the market is better positioned for a turnaround." (emphasis added)

-NAR, May 23, 2008


Um, no.

Home sales fell for the follwoing simple and obvious reasons: 1) Prices are still too high; 2) a huge amount of supply is out there, and 3) there is a reasonable expectation on the part of buyers that prices will fall lower still.

Regardless of the data or what their own agents say, the folks at the NAR cannot help but shill for their industry — even when it has become totally counter-productive.  They are apparently quite happy with being known as the Worst. Forecasters. Ever.

How else can you explain their shameless twisting of their own data? Don’t these damn fools realize that they have simply lost all credibility? I have heard more than a few Real Estate agents complain that sellers have unrealistic expectations of prices, due in large part to the ongoing and ridiculous bottom calls and turnaround forecast form the NAR.

Perhaps the absurdist commentary that accompanies each monthly release means someone at the NAR is trying for a doctorate in Absurdism, and these monthly releases are their doctoral thesis. Nothing else (short  of blunt head trauma) explains the ridiculous monthly spin.

Rant over.

Let’s go to the actual data:

• Purchases declined 1% percent from March to an annualized rate of 4.89 million.
• Median prices fell to $202,300 from $219,900 in April 2007, about am ~8% drop from April 2007 (2nd-biggest historical decline), but was up 1% sequentially.
• Sales were down 18% from April 2007
• Inventory of existing homes jumped to 4.55 million, up from 4.12 million in March.
• Months supply for single family homes rose to 10.7 from 9.6, the highest since July 1985
• 11.2 months’ supply at current sales pace, up 10% from 10 months at the end of March (25 yr avg is 6.9 months)
• Months supply in condos/co-ops rose to 14.2 months from 12.8.

Bottom line: Rising inventory levels, ongoing price drops, falling unit sales means the bottom is nowhere in sight for the housing sector.


NAR and Housing Forecasts (June 2007)

Recent NAR Bottom/Turnaround calls (January 2008)

Existing-Home Sales Ease Due to Mortgage Restrictions; Some Markets Rising
NAR, May 23, 2008

Category: Data Analysis, Real Estate

Housing Price to Rent Ratio

Category: Real Estate

This Bull Has (Had) Legs !

Quite a while ago, I had an interesting conversation with a smart fundie manager. We had opposing views about many things. In particular, we disagreed upon was the value of (non-price) sentiment indicators. His argument was that when stocks get cheap enough — as reflected in their Prices, P/Es and cash flow measures — other…Read More

Category: Contrary Indicators, Financial Press, Investing, Markets, Psychology

James Galbraith Says Housing Problem to Last `Long Time’

Since we get existing home sales later today:

James Galbraith, an economics professor at the University of Texas,
talks with Bloomberg’s Matt Miller from Austin, Texas, about the
outlook for the U.S. economy and the challenges facing the next
president, the impact of Federal Reserve monetary policy on inflation,
and the state of the U.S. housing market.

click for video


James Galbraith Says Housing Problem to Last `Long Time’
Bloomberg, May 16 2008

Category: Economy, Real Estate, Video

Is eBay “Broken” ?

Category: Consumer Spending, Retail, Web/Tech

Half Empty? No Such Thing!

Category: Data Analysis, Psychology, Quantitative

Currency for the Blind

Category: Currency, Economy, Taxes and Policy

Coincident Index by States

Category: Economy, Federal Reserve, Politics

Philly Fed: Don’t Rely On Core Inflation

Category: Data Analysis, Federal Reserve, Inflation

Continuing Unemployment Insurance Claims Say “Recession”

Category: Data Analysis, Economy, Employment