Financials: Worse than they look?

Fins_chartOn Tuesday, we wondered aloud what the S&P500 might have looked like had the true nature of the Financial sector’s true risk-adjusted earnings been known (S&P500 ex-Risk ?).

We questioned how the Financials looked historically, now that they wiped out so much profitability from the past few years.

One of the more interesting emails came from a person who wanted to
know how $100 in defaulted sub-prime mortgages could do so much
damage. The short answer is that its not merely the mortgages, but the entire derivative house of cards built on the backs of the sub-primes. Mortgages got repackages into residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”).  These were in turn repackaged into collateralised debt obligations (“CDOs”). These  were re-repackaged in part as credit default swaps (“CDS”).

This entire derivative pile was based upon the explicit assumption that default rates would stay within the range of historic averages. That turned out to be a false assumption. So as the Mortgages increasingly enter delinquency, default and foreclosure, the highly leveraged alphabet soup on top of them took a giant hit. (See the graphics here for a visual explanation).

The situation may be even uglier than we previously believed:

"When it comes to working out the impact on banks, the task becomes even harder. For in recent years, banks have not simply been acquiring subprime loans, they have been repackaging them into complex “asset-backed securities” (ABS) that can be difficult to value. The Bank of England, for example, suggests that on the basis of industry data some $700bn-worth of bonds backed by subprime loans are now in circulation in the world’s financial system, with another $600bn of bonds backed by so-called “Alt A” loans, or those with slightly better credit quality.

Moreover, these bonds have then been used to create even more complex securities backed by diversified pools of debt, known as collateralised debt obligations (CDOs). According to the Bank’s calculations, for example, some $390bn of CDOs containing a proportion of mortgage debt were issued last year – though the precise level of the subprime component varies.

The multi-layered nature of these complex financial flows means it is hard to assess how defaults by homeowners will affect the value of related securities."

We’ve all heard those numbers bandied about — but what do they actually mean to the various banks and brokers?  Consider the Level 3 assets. Marketwatch describes these as follows:  "Some assets are so esoteric and trade so infrequently that investment banks have to value them based on mathematical models, rather than the market prices of similar or related securities."

In other words, these are the least traded, most estimated, hardest-to-accurately-value-because-there-is-a-dearth-of-buyers paper.

Here’s the truly ugly side of this:  When valuing these assets (derivatives, private-equity investments, CDOs and mortgage-servicing rights) the mark-to-model techniques are applied to an unhealthy slice of these holdings. According to Brad Hintz, an analyst at Bernstein Research (he was formerly Lehman Bros’  CFO), a huge amount of this stuff is still improperly priced:

% Level 3 trading inventory valued using mark-to-model techniques
Goldman Sachs    15%
Morgan Stanley    13%
Lehman Brothers    8%
Bear Stearns    7%
Merrill Lynch    2%

Source: Bernstein Research

I am not sure of the precise amount of Level 3 assets currently held, but it is substantial.

The next tier, Level 2, are described as those assets that may not trade much, but that can be theoretically valued by checking market prices of  similar securities and making assumptions about variables such as interest rates (MBS, some corporate bonds and CDOs).

According to Dick Bove of Punk Ziegel, the five largest U.S. brokers and banks — Citigroup, J.P. Morgan Chase and Bank of America — have $4.1 trillion of these Level 2 assets on their balance sheets.

That’s almost 10 times their shareholder equity.

When the final coda of this era is written, wiping out 5 years or so of earnings is going to look like a bargain . . .

 

>


Sources:
What’s the subprime damage to banks?   
Gillian Tett and Paul J Davies
FT, November 4 2007 18:08
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/3ca7bbc0-8af5-11dc-95f7-0000779fd2ac.html

Wall Street’s stress test
Alistair Barr
MarketWatch, 7:57 PM ET Sep 7, 2007
http://tinyurl.com/33brp4

Banks Face $100 Billion of Writedowns on Level 3 Rule
John Glover
Bloomberg, Nov. 7 2007
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=ap42s_XrP58Q&

Risk of securities fire sale mounts
David Wighton and Saskia Scholtes in New York and Gillian Tett in London
FT, November 6 20
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/17f683c2-8c9b-11dc-b887-0000779fd2ac.html

2007 Global CDO and Credit Derivatives Outlook   
Fitch, 13 December 2006
http://www.mortgagebankers.org/files/Conferences/2007/CREFFebruary/Fitch2007GolbalCDOforEvolution.pdf

Category: Corporate Management, Credit, Derivatives, Earnings, Psychology, Real Estate, Valuation

Free Economist?

Category: Financial Press

Tesla Demo

Category: Technology

Quote of the Day: That’s Not a Central Bank . . .

Category: Federal Reserve, Inflation

When Does GM Get Kicked Out of the DJIA?

Category: Corporate Management, Economy, Financial Press, Markets, Valuation

Crude Oil = $98; Gold = $845

Category: Commodities, Currency, Energy, Federal Reserve, Inflation, Markets

Eagles Disintermediate Major Labels, ITMS

Eagles_055819

The Eagles — the multi-platinum selling alt country/rock band circa 1970s — are trying an interesting sales strategy for their first studio album in 28 years.

For the new disc, it appears that there is:

- no recording label participation;
- downloads at their site only;
- physical 2-CD Set purchased only at Wal-Mart, or ordered at their site ((Eaglesband.com).

2_their_greatest_hits

The band cranked out over 700,000 discs in the first week — not too shabby for a double disc.

For you young ‘uns, the album Eagles: Their Greatest Hits 1971–1975 is the all time best-selling album in the U.S. (according to the RIAA); Their album Hotel California is #18 on the all time top selling list).

What’s really interesting is the downloading — the double disc is available for in two formats: MP3 256k for $10.88, and in FLAC lossless for $11.88, directly from the band’s website. 

I am not sure, but it appears that both the labels and Apple’s iTunes have been cut out of the picture.

(I’ll update this as I learn more)

>

Update: November 7, 2007 5:52am

The Eagles made a
direct exclusive deal with Wal-Mart for physical album — no label involved.

The band
sold the album to Wal-Mart on a one-way basis (meaning, no returns). 

1_hotel_californiaMy anonymous industry source adds:

"If memory
serves, I believe they bought 3.6M units at $8 or $9.  The Band pays
manufacturing costs and publishing (most of which goes to themselves as writers)
and keeps the rest. Pretty nice haul. I haven’t confirmed with the
manager, but I believe the downloads are being done by the band through their
site only."

Again, no iTunes, no labels . . .

>

Sources:

Eagles
Wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eagles

Top 100 Albums   
RIAA 
http://www.riaa.com/goldandplatinumdata.php?table=tblTop100

Revised Chart Policy Lands Eagles At No. 1
Mitchell Peters
Billboard, November 06, 2007, 8:30 PM ET
http://www.billboard.com/bbcom/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003668840

Previously:

JT bypasses the Labels   
http://bigpicture.typepad.com/comments/2004/12/james_taylor_by.html

Read More

Category: Digital Media, Music

Headline of the Day: Electricity Deregulation

Category: Energy, Taxes and Policy

Crude Oil hits $97

Category: Commodities, Economy, Energy, Markets

Quote of the Day: The Xera

Category: Currency, Federal Reserve, Inflation, Psychology