Let’s see if I can do this –WHILE I’M LIVE ON THE AIR.
WHEW! That was difficult! I won’t be trying that again!
11:41 am: Intel (INTC) has a FusionIQ rating of 35 — out of 100 !
11:38 am: Wow I agree with Harvey Pitt –thats a first ! I don’t think Hedge funds should escape regulation, but their investors need to be treated differently than stock investors…
11:33 am: Oilmidge under $114 — the lovely Melissa Lee is sittingnext to me discussing Paulson’s committee, and hard to value assest.
11:32am: Wow this is hard to do !
11:30am: 100 point swing in the Dow as all 3 indices slip into the red.
11:27am: Come and knock on my door: Dylan Trish & Melissa
11:24am: Trannies & Rails — proof not of a strong economy, but of Ag, Coal and commodities.
11:22am: I wanted to add that Airlines have had a "good" problem of increased demand over the past 30 years as more and more non-business clients became regular fliers. Most businesses welcome a secular increase in demand — it has been a problems for the Airlines.
Hedge fund manager Scott Frew is a friend and occasional fishing partner. He had a few words to say about this morning’s discussion re: Volcker and Bernanke:
I wanted to flesh out some of what Barry wrote earlier about former and current Fed Chairs Volcker and Bernanke. We must begin with Bernake’s now infamous Deflation speech. It is certainly “The Speech.” And I think in many ways it’s a terrifying document.
I am, by the way, in total agreement that Greenspan’s the guy who’s responsible for all of this; the particularly insidious quality of bubbles is that once you’re in one, the future is more or less pre-ordained.
An ironic corollary of that thought is that it pretty much invalidates the entire, mainstream (most certainly including Bernanke and Greeenspan), Milton Friedman-inspired critique/view of the Great Depression as having resulted from bad monetary policy on the part of the Fed as the bubble burst. They needed, according to that critique, to be much looser than they were, and all the problems would have been avoided.
So, in a sense, Bernanke’s an acolyte of that same church (recall him saying to Friedman, at some dinner or something honoring him, Never again; i.e., as a result of the lessons learned, taught by Friedman, the central bank would never repeat those Depression errors,), can’t fall back himself on a “It’s Greenspan’s fault” defense, because that’s antithetical to their whole view of history.
I see The Speech itself as a terrifying document, although it’s also an
absolute blueprint for what’s going on today — you’ve got to give Ben
credit for foresight; he’s running down the checklist he provided there,
item by item, line by line. Too bad none of it’s working, at least to date, but
instead is exacerbating the problems.